We should take the government approach and make a list of what is not a woman. I’ll make a start:
1. A chest of drawers
2. Lamingtons
3. Speeding fines
4. A hex head 8g 15mm screw
5. A tidal river with adjoining wetland system and environs
6. A 6 speed Ford transmission
7. …

” Thus human female bodies and brains are quite different…”

Yep.
Indeed, we know from studying young chimpanzees that given a ‘free choice’ of toys to play with, males prefer “things” (car, gun etc) while females prefer “people” (dolls etc). Generally speaking, of course. And this makes perfect sense from a biology perspective – if you are the primary care giver of the newborns (which is usually the female) then it is a survival advantage if you are “interested” in ‘people’, while for a protective male, it is a survival advantage if you are interested in ‘things’ (clubs, bows and arrows, buildings etc). If the bigger, stronger males go out to hunt, while the females gather fruit, vegies, nuts etc, then being “social” advantages women, while being better able to navigate advantages men. And so on and so forth. This is 100’s of thousands, perhaps even millions of years of evolution, of survival of the fittest. It’s real.We need to take these sorts of differences into account when researching things like the “gender pay gap” – is the above listed “interests” the reason for this to exist? Perhaps it is – perhaps women would be (generally) more interested in doing “social” and “help” degrees at university (social worker, nurse etc) while men will be more interested in “things” degrees – the typical STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Math) courses. If there is an abundance of “social” trained workers and a shortage of “things” trained workers, then men will tend to be paid more.

We (well, the lefty wokeists, anyway) seem to have trouble distinguishing between “the same” and “different, but equal”. Men and women are different, but that doesn’t mean they can’t be equal – at least before the law and in other dealings with “authority”, “governance” and so on. Ditto black vs white, or christian vs muslim vs atheist. Differences exist. They are real. We should recognise them. But they should make no difference in the way we treat people (as a general thing – there will obviously be some exceptions). Oddly, this (recognising the differences) allows for diversity – of thought, of action and of opinion. Such diversity is also a survival advantage for any species, including us. The lefties say they support diversity, yet want to suppress recognition of it.