In the name of ‘love’


The process of humiliation continues.


Subscribe
Notify of
guest

9 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
rosie
rosie
August 13, 2021 4:00 pm

I see they’ve now blurred her face.

Pogria
Pogria
August 14, 2021 2:37 pm
Reply to  rosie

I noticed that also. Saw the pic earlier today. Perhaps mummy wasn’t impressed that “daddy”, took their little one to the “Ball”.

Zipster
Zipster
August 13, 2021 8:08 pm

have to train them young

Shy Ted
Shy Ted
August 14, 2021 4:55 pm

Reading the article it says “mum opened her home….”. There really is no hope for these poor kids. At least the child is a girl so the gaymen are unlikely to be interested. We all know what mum is going to look like without even seeing a pic of her.

Muddy
Muddy
August 14, 2021 5:46 pm

At the risk of being called hurty names by the mean grls, I’m not going to jump to any conclusion based on one photograph. I’m happy to be corrected, but I doubt a child of that age would be able to interpret any complex meaning from what she is witnessing.

I’m also not going to jump to the conclusion that because people participate in a lifestyle I don’t understand or share, those people in the presence of a child will hold or act upon immoral thoughts. Without further information, it is neither possible nor desirable to come to that conclusion. If the men in the photo are known well by the girl’s family, it’s possible that if they saw someone behaving inappropriately, they might very well beat the sh!t out of him. Who knows?

It’s not surprising that the photo has gained plaudits from the same people who are promoting their event. Thanks to Andy Ngo – one of few with actual guts step into the ring – they’ve probably gained a heck of a lot more airtime than they might have been expecting.

Zipster
Zipster
August 14, 2021 7:42 pm

Iconic and meaningful to whom exactly? the prats of the left

Muddy
Muddy
August 15, 2021 12:55 pm
Reply to  dover0beach

I understood the point, dover, but I feel that reactive posts such as this simply feed our opponents’ narrative. If they were dressing the child in gear like their own, that would be a different matter entirely.

I’m aware I use the collective ‘we’ far too much, but I wish that ‘we’ would realise that by continuing to permit our opponents to set the rules, and then react to the same, there can be no positive, measurable, outcome. The only way to conquer is by taking and maintaining the initiative.

These type of posts are Pavlovian, and will take us nowhere. We are chasing our own tails.

  1. Firstly, you don’t live in the electorate. Secondly, pedant confirmed. Thirdly, despite what you may think, Warren Mundine is not…

  2. Do you live in Bradfield, Roger? No, I didn’t think so.I know the electorate quite well, Cassie. Pedant? If that…

  3. I know the electorate quite well, Cassie. Pedant? If that means someone who bases an argument on facts & figures…

  4. Put it another way, Mundine is too good for Bradfield. It’s not an aspirational sort of area. It’s stuffy and…

9
0
Oh, you think that, do you? Care to put it on record?x
()
x