This is what doctors are not permitted to say or permitted to do

So much for free speech and open debate. First there’s this from the Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency, Registered health practitioners and students: What you need to know about the COVID-19 vaccine rollout, and this is what they state (amongst other things).

‘There is no place for anti-vaccination messages in professional health practice, and any promotion of anti-vaccination claims including on social media, and advertising may be subject to regulatory action.’

And then there’s this, Australia’s TGA issues new restrictions on doctors prescribing Ivermectin.

Today, the TGA, acting on the advice of the Advisory Committee for Medicines Scheduling, has placed new restrictions on the prescribing of oral ivermectin….

These changes have been introduced because of concerns with the prescribing of oral ivermectin for the claimed prevention or treatment of COVID-19. Ivermectin is not approved for use in COVID-19 in Australia or in other developed countries, and its use by the general public for COVID-19 is currently strongly discouraged by the National COVID Clinical Evidence Taskforce, the World Health Organisation and the US Food and Drug Administration.

What if there are dangers from taking the Vax and Ivermectin actually helps cure someone of Covid? Don’t worry, it only took medicine 1500 years to find out about blood circulation.

13 thoughts on “This is what doctors are not permitted to say or permitted to do”

  1. ‘There is no place for anti-vaccination messages in professional health practice, and any promotion of anti-vaccination claims including on social media, and advertising may be subject to regulatory action.’
    ******
    But listen to what health professionals say about the covid jabs, because you can totally trust them to give you unbiassed advice free from any fear or favour.
    [I wonder if any health professional will speak publicly about the risks of the covid jabs, and then at the regulatory hearing say “I wasn’t saying anything “anti-vaccination”, just anti-these particular products which aren’t really “vaccines” anyway”.]


    Report comment

    11
  2. I asked the GP the other week, had he had many requests for Ivermectin scripts from patients? He indicated that Medicare was preparing pyres out of green kindling at a site in Canberra for GPs that write them- or something to that effect. He indicated that his understanding from a teleconference with the “Professor”, the other month, was that the stuff didn’t do anything. Let me guess, Professor Bodgy from Doherty.

    I note from the TGA document, para 4:

    “These higher doses can be associated with serious adverse effects, including severe nausea, vomiting, dizziness, neurological effects such as dizziness, seizures and coma.”

    Interestingly, the “serious adverse effects” indicated seem to be the kind that people sick with covid exhibit. And obviously the Ivermectin must be responsible. Causality as a concept is obviously not as widespread or prized these days in public health.

    I have noted that the several studies that the lot of them ( WHO, CDC, FDA, TGA, MSM….) refer to, all suggest that Ivermectin was being used either late or as a last resort rather than when other studies indicate it is mainly effective for early treatment. As well as misunderstanding the mode of action exerting a rather limiting step on viral replication (mediating covid viral RNA polymerase inhibition by facilitating high intercellular zinc, not concentration driven direct steric competition with spike protein at the ACE2 receptor).

    Minus the coma and seizures, these “reactions” sound a bit like a hangover, or the day decades ago at primary school when Mum apparently used some tuna for sandwiches that was a bit past it for school lunch. So society as a whole is barred from accessing effective early treatment because twice a year a couple of twits that can’t convert between micrograms and milligrams, turn up to the local hospital spewing with their guts devoid of worms and everything else as well.


    Report comment

    7
  3. To Quote Scotty from Marketing, Gladys, Dictator Dan, Pallachook etc “We are All in This Together”

    POLITICS – Members of Congress and Their Staff Are Exempt From Biden’s Vaccine Mandate

    President Joe Biden’s new vaccine mandates for federal employees don’t apply to members of Congress or those who work for Congress or the federal court system.

    Biden issued two executive orders on Thursday requiring vaccination against COVID for federal workers and contractors who work for the federal government. He also asked the Department of Labor to issue an emergency order requiring businesses with more than 100 employees to ensure their workers are vaccinated or tested on a weekly basis.

    However, Biden’s order on federal workers applies to employees of the executive branch. The House of Representatives and the Senate belong to the separate legislative branch, and the courts to the judicial branch of the federal government.


    Report comment

    4
  4. I notice how they are using the expression ‘anti-vaccination’ to conceal the real inconvenience: it is not opposition to vaccines which is at issue, but

    1) nervousness about these vaccines, and that nervousness is not irrational but based on their experimental nature and/or

    2) opposition to forcing people to be vaccinated by legislation or regulation all to save face.

    Decisions were made early last year based on the information at the time, a mixed bag of that which would prove reliable and that which would not.

    In the pell-mell scramble to be seen ‘doing something’ politicians and those groups who felt ought to be involved decisively committed themselves to positions on the disease and cures.

    But as new information has become available they have clung to their original claims and even demanded information be censored or suppressed, or distorted or outright manufactured, to spare them admitting they are fallible.


    Report comment

    7
  5. We know what the medical profession following the science brought in the 1930’s.

    Where will the medical profession following the science in the 2020’s lead?


    Report comment

    5
  6. They worry themselves to tears that the hospital system will be overwhelmed if we aren’t all jabbed, but refuse to even consider (nay, actively suppress!) existing therapeutic regimens with every indication of efficacy in speeding recovery and keeping people out of hospitals.

    Truly, we are in collective thrall to people who are nowhere near the brightest among us.


    Report comment

    6
  7. Perfidious Albinosays:
    September 12, 2021 at 2:43 pm
    They worry themselves to tears that the hospital system will be overwhelmed if we aren’t all jabbed, but refuse to even consider (nay, actively suppress!) existing therapeutic regimens with every indication of efficacy in speeding recovery and keeping people out of hospitals.

    Given the NSW Management – Emergency department assessment and management of COVID-19 in adults (Delta variant) – they do B’All when you are in Hospital.

    PDF: Emergency department assessment and management of COVID-19 in adults

    ?????????NSW Quick reference guide?


    Report comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *