This is a patent application seeking to patent Methods and systems of prioritizing treatments, vaccination, testing and/or activities while protecting the privacy of individuals. This is how it was described in the note that was sent to me with this now approved patent application:
This Pfizer patent application was approved August 31st, 2021, and is the very first patent that shows up in a list of over 18500 for the purpose of remote contact tracing of all vaccinated humans worldwide who will be or are now connected to the “internet of things” by a quantum link of pulsating microwave frequencies of 2.4 gHz or higher from cell towers and satellites directly to the graphene oxide held in the fatty tissues of all persons who’ve had the death-shot.
This is the abstract on the patent itself:
System and methods for anonymously selecting subjects for treatment against an infectious disease caused by a pathogen . The system comprises a plurality of electronic devices comprising instructions to generate an ID and , when in proximity of another such electronic device , one or both electronic devices transmit / receive the ID to / from the other electronic device . Then , a score is generated based on a plurality of such received IDs . Additionally , based on information received from a server , relevant treatment instructions are displayed to the subjects based on the received information and the score . The server comprises instructions for sending to the plurality of electronic devices the information to be displayed with the relevant treatment instructions, additionally the server and / or the electronic devices comprise instructions to generate a prediction of likelihood of a subject transmitting the pathogen, based on the score of the subject.
This is the first of the claims on the patent application:
What is claimed is:
1. A method of prophylactically vaccinating a population having a plurality of subjects with a vaccine against an epidemic infectious disease, said plurality of subjects each using a smart electronic device, the method comprising: a. a. using an ID for each said smart electronic device for determining a propensity of proximity of each said plurality of subjects; said determining a propensity of proximity comprises: i. at a proximity event, when a particular said smart electronic device of a particular said subject is in proximity of one or more other of said smart electronic devices, transmitting an ID or an indication thereof to said one or more other smart electronic devices and receiving an ID or indication thereof from said one or more other smart electronic devices, by said particular smart electronic device; said proximity event being an event where said particular said subject could, if infected, potentially infect other subjects with said infectious disease; ii. generating a score reflecting a propensity for proximity, according to a plurality of received IDs; said propensity of proximity reflecting a chance of infecting other subjects if said particular said subject becomes infected; b. generating for each said plurality of subjects a prioritization of vaccination based on said score; said prioritization being higher for subjects having a higher propensity of proximity; and c. prophylactically vaccinating particular subjects of said plurality of subjects according to said prioritization.
Let me direct you to page 68 of the patent application where the criterion they are using as an example of the kind of activity they will be able to identify is “Visits religious gathering”. Why anyone would wish to know something like that one can only imagine, but look for yourself. It seems beyond sinister.
As I understand what we are looking at is a means to inject everyone with a means to trace where they are and where they have been every second of every day through the “graphene oxide” that has been injected into each individual.
This is on page 68 as well:
It is expected that during the life of a patent maturing from this application many relevant parameters of scoring activity of individuals and methods of measuring said parameters will be developed ; the scope of the invention herein is intended to include all such new technologies a priori .
If I understand this right, the government will be able to contact trace you everywhere you go every day of your life according to whichever criteria they choose based on a vaccination you have received.
I hope others will be able to clarify what is being patented and what it will be able to do. My guess is that we have moved so far forward into whatever plans are in train that no one any longer cares who knows about this since the relative handful of those who care will be able to do nothing, while the majority just will not care at all no matter what is said.
21 thoughts on “Remote contract tracing of all vaccinated humans worldwide”
Steve – is the repetition done for a reason?
I’m old enough to remember when they said “the ‘vaccine’ would be used to track injectees” was a conspiracy theory.
Also, I’m old enough to remember when they said we just need to lock down for fourteen days to flatten the curve.
Now “double dosed Victorians may be locked up if they don’t take the booster shots if required.”
I’ll pass on that idea of ‘vaccine freedom’ thanks.
I haven’t read the patent…. But:
I did a search in the patent… there is no mention of microwaves graphene or such.
Pfizer is mentioned in only one place … where all the other vaccines are men too Rd too.
So whilst it does talk about scary internet of things monitoring likely infected or potentially infected people (without them knowing and identifying them for vaccination using their and other electronic devices … care should be taken if there is a suggestion that the vaxx itself will track you…
Microwaves are ionising radiation and not at 2.5ghz or 5ghz, cell towers do not use microwaves to talk to phones or other smart devices. 5G is non ionising, 5G can not be used to pick up graphene in fat tissues that I am aware of. I am not aware of any powered or unpowered technology that could be small enough to be injectable and still be picked up by a cell tower . Perhaps its alien lizard overlord tech?
It smells like just another conspiracy theory. The wife actually mentioned this one from facebook last year, I told her it was nonsense.
Well I think this ‘covidpass’ thing from World Economic Forum is a more relevant angle to examine Steve.
Apparently WEF know a specific blood test can determine evidence of covid-vaccination, so there must be some form of long term marker in all the vaccines for this system to be viable. Even the Chinese and Russian versions??
Straight from Revelation 13.16.
Also, the Digital Identity Bill Phase 3 is now before parliament.
Have your say on this Bill here;
It’s all coming together – this is not just a physical battle but is spiritual, as it always has been, it’s just that evil has become so arrogant it is now showing itself.
I’ve had my say on the proposed digital identity and am glad I’m 68 and not 8.
If any of this is true we do need a revolution as my Chec mate used to say.
Czech, I meant.
What a disaster. Or are we just hoping for times long gone and anachronistic?
Very good article. Thank you.
I found an interesting clip from Dr Franc Zalewski (Poland).
Suggests another means of identification?
ah ha ha ha ha
why do people believe stuff they see on the internet
jeez, call an engineer
This is the patent Zev Zelenko was referring to in his interviews the other month. There’s much I could say about it though the aspects that stand out:
a- There doesn’t need to be an implantable device to implement such tracing and monitoring. Mobile phones and the 5g network would do the trick. I thought there already had been some proximity to other people’s phones aspect to the government covid app.
b- It is unclear to me without real time, or near real time inferences on the endogenous goings on within individuals wrt what’s happening virus-wise if at all, how on earth some AI, supercomputing capacity and calculation relevant to models could actually work.
Actually work in terms of somehow preventing “superspreaders” doing their thing by SMSs or whatever to head on down for some (more) gene therapy. That is assuming such a conceptualisation is reflected at all in reality.
It would also require that the gene therapy actually works which it does not.
c) Struck me as a rather naive attempt to convince the patent office, the reader that it is possible to automate predictive modelling of complex systems composed of multiplexed, enmeshed, stratifications of complex systems. Within each complex system a poorly understood series of network centric subsystems ( immune system function). A hell of a lot of network inputs and outputs. Hell of a lot more nodes. Would probably need technology based on something better than carrier waves.
If the models around which some kind of AI predictive system is based on the same non-science, non-reason and non-sense which seem to have formed the basis of government responses to covid, I can’t see how such a mass tracing system has a chance in hell of achieving anything. Other than making a number of computer and telecommunication systems engineers wealthier than they were. Perhaps killing and maiming massive numbers of people in the process of demonstrating the lack of utility of the system proposed within the patent.
Then again perhaps the latter is the purpose and objective of the whole planned scamdemic and the gene therapy interventions.
Compared to a “real” product I see a parallel to that ridiculous room cooler thing that was blanket marketed on YouTube the other year. The thing smaller than a toaster with a fan in it, that you add a metric cup of water to, from time to time. Useless in terms of in-line efficacy though perhaps attractive to stupid people like the Dictator of Victoria hell bent on making the world in his’ mind’s image. Though as we have seen already, large numbers of people, whole populations and their well-being now a misnomer, have become expendable commodities with similar rights to chickens intensively farmed in sheds and for cage eggs.
In some ways such a system as proposed provides one analogous to the nature of the farm hand’s task at such a farm. Walking through the sheds, picking out the sickest looking while not necessarily unhealthy chickens as they go, to do some “vertebral dislocation” and turf the dying corpses off to one side, to be collected by the pet food people daily.
Nonetheless, with this Digital Identity Bill into the third reading to add to the list of “national security”and “anti-terrorism” bills that have passed in recent times and those taxpayer funded holiday camps going up, well, it is hard not to feel somewhat bothered about what next exactly. The complete lack of external oversight of the agencies and activities to which these endlessly increasing powers are granted. If a foreign power or other malign entity was pulling the strings, how on earth and by what mechanisms could the situation be addressed and rectified without a complete and total devolution of government and society?
This patent bring to mind the 1971 film THX-1138. Where the AI monitors if the people are taking the right medications, at the right times and in correct combinations as provided direct to the equivalent of their kitchen cupboard.
@ HD- Surely you are not saying that the patent writers are trying on a Bullshit Baffles Brains patent application, in order to snaffle Other Peoples’ Money from governments and rich corporate stooges alike when the latest fad of ‘green’ hydrogen keels over?
Anyone know how to make a Perpetual Motion Machine sound New! and Special! and Science! enough to warrant a patent and a few Green Loan applications?
Maybe if it includes a few flywheels…
@ Rex Anger. Not sure that’s a question, though yes Excrementum vincit cerebellum is certainly an element of this particular patent.
I recall in the early 2000’s sending a HOD white at a particular university when I responded “Death is unlikely as a result of exposure to bread yeast though does represent a potential outcome should any member of staff with a yeast allergy become inappropriately or accidentally exposed.” To a query if a SWMS document and hazard assessment should be undertaken prior to some electron microscope imaging- of some yeast I cultured up from a packet I bought from the IGA up the road from my flat.
I in more recent times resisted the urge to take the piss out of people during the last 18 months that asked me given my background about reasonable steps they could take to protect themselves from covid. Given a mate from school’s experience in nursing during the same period. They had some bloke turn up to emergency last year with a number of carrots internalised he could not remove. Heard something about this being a home remedy that boosted immunity to particular viruses. Resulted in a general and laparoscopic procedure to get them out.
Have to be careful what to tell people who are a bit traumatised and vulnerable. As well as state dictators and public health officials who seem to have lost the plot with a history of either or both of implementing utter idiocy and actions that would seem to fall within the definition of sociopathy. The latter really seem to think some giant Joseph Stalin/ Vlad Lenin style statues of them to rival those of Kim Il Sung will be going up one of these days. Who cares if a course of action is completely baseless and useless(?)
They could have just said no, eh? 😉
But apart from all that, plus eleventy to your reply. It’s getting stupidly crazy out there…
AFAIK, there are still basic limitations on what you can link to any communications system, because physics.
I breed livestock and electronic tags are mandatory for selling some classes of stock. The range and lifespan of those tags are limited by the size of the antenna and the power available for transmission, despite them being many orders of magnitude larger than the molecular-scale nanotechnology being posited as a part of these injections.
That said, it looks like time to swap the smartphone for a non-gps, non-browser “dumb phone”. The attractions of tracking and monitoring are just too great for bureaucrats to withstand.
It is common to point to the known inefficiency and “stupidity” of Government and argue that they couldn’t run a decent conspiracy to save their lives. I’ve done it myself. However it is deeply unwise to underestimate an adversary. Point is, that a really smart authoritarian would provide a number of decoys for resisters and conspiracy-theorists to chase.
So it is quite possible that they are “up to something”, but if so, it probably isn’t going to be revealed by such an obvious mistake as this.
But that dumb-phone is looking good.
Again, this is technology that’s been tested & tweaked in Animal Husbandry for decades, for the purpose of being applied to humans.
Cancel Culture is not a new thing.
Those who twigged, asked questions, dug deeper & warned people all those decades ago, were either destroyed or rewarded for recanting & singing a lulling tune instead.
Read the fucking patent claims.
1. A method of prophylactically vaccinating a population having a plurality of subjects with a vaccine against an epidemic infectious disease, said plurality of subjects each using a smart electronic device
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein said using an ID comprises using an ID having fewer than 100,000 potential values.
According to some embodiments of the invention, said one or more electronic devices are one or more of a smartphone, a tablet, a smartwatch and a dedicated electronic device.
You do have to love this, though.
“quantum, pulsating, microwave, boogers, 5G, chinese, graphene.”
I’m surprised they didn’t blame the J*ws, given the specific references to other Israeli patents.
… the Globalist Agenda pushers who made sure not to “scare ‘the horses’, before they’re corralled”.
Remember when microchips were first being rolled out for pet I.D. and there were endless problems of moving & lost chips, & readers that couldn’t read some & only others if they were physically on top of the thing?
That was just some of the tweaking and, Lulling Theatre.
I can’t recall the specific range that chips were already readable from at that time (we’re talking around 40 years ago), but it was very long range.
Not everybody. Just the proles.
I concur with your points.
It smacks of a deliberately-planted “misdirection” piece that may be recycled by the unknowing or unwary, thus, in turn, said individuals self-identify on the Net.
Reasonably crafty Psy-Ops.
““quantum, pulsating, microwave, boogers, 5G, chinese, graphene.””
Have you read “Engines of Creation : The Coming Era of Nanotechnology” by K. E. Drexler?
In that book, he goes through the physical limitations from known physics, medicine, chemistry etc etc.
While it is certainly within the realms of “possible” to do such things, it seems unlikely we are there just yet – although one never knows, I guess. Simply based in Moore’s Law for semiconductor manufacturing (“chips”), we should be approaching it and, barring some disaster, any time after 2025 or so will be when it is all doable. In case you are unaware, we are rapidly approaching the limits of shrinking the “feature size” for such chips – we already have such devices that have just a single layer of a specific molecule (mostly SiO2, but also Al), and we can machine (chemically) a “quantum trap” for a single electron on such devices.
Even giving yourself an order of magnitude margin for error for both size and speed of operation, a mechanical device that can enter a cell, read your DNA, make sub-cellular repairs and/or change your DNA, and build pretty much anything (raw materials and energy of course being the limiting factor), including a copy of itself, is doable – at least, the known laws of physics do not prevent it.
Drexler spoke to many specialist of many areas, and on the specific questions he asked, they agreed what he proposed was possible – they only had a double take when he synthesised the entire body of that work, whence calls of “impossible!” were made.
There are many great and good things such a technology could do – as well as the nasty flip side too.
For instance, you could manufacture, say, a car from a 3D weave of diamond fibres – it would be 5 times stiffer and 10 times stronger than the same weight of aluminium, so you could likely make it the same stiffness and twice as strong for 20% of the weight. That’s not insignificant, given that the reduced weight would mean less engine power would be required for the same performance, further reducing weight and reducing fuel usage.
You could also quite literally be made “young” again, by putting you to sleep, deep freezing you and then rebuilding all of your cells individually. Go to sleep with the body of a 70 year old, wake up with the body of a 20 year old. All genetic diseases removed or “disabled”.
You could also create a “seed” that “grows” into whatever device you want – a car, a house, whatever, and requires nothing more than sunlight and the materials available in your block of land.
The nasty flip side would, of course, include a virus that is only deadly to one specific persons DNA, or one “race”, sex etc. And the possibility of the “grey goo” scenario, where it goes out of control and “eats” the entire biosphere of the planet to make copies of itself.
There are a great deal of things you can make when you have the ability for “a place for every atom, and every atom in it’s place”, even if you have a fairly limited set of base atoms to start with – carbon, aluminium, oxygen & silicon (all quite abundant) are enough to create many, many things that are quite valuable and “skills limited” at the present time – diamond (the hardest material known) and sapphire (the most heat resistant material known) for example, could be made in any shape and quantity desired, and even, as above, made as a 3D weave, so that the thing made of a single piece of diamond does not have a fracture plane, and is coated in sapphire (sounds like a pretty good thing for a space craft window needed for re-entry, for example).
All of this is still only “passive” nanotech – “active” materials that contain their own nanobots and repair themselves would also be possible.
You may scoff as you please, but as I said, barring some disaster, it will come – it is inevitable, as Feynman’s “There’s plenty of room at the bottom” lecture from decades ago intimates (and on which Drexler based his work).
It will be what is known as the “technological singularity” – any and all predictions about what our planet might look like and contain are out the window when this tech comes of age. Consider what it would mean to have every current internet web site, with all it’s content, available in a device no bigger than the head of a match. Add the ability to “grow” complex machines using sunlight and natural raw materials. Imagine what that would allow you to do… you can’t imagine all of it, any more than you could have imagined today’s internet on your mobile phone in the 1960’s – near instant global communications, automated translation between languages, watching a movie streamed to your mobile phone while you catch the train to work, satnav to guide you where you want to go etc etc.
How many saw all of that coming, and it came pretty fast in the scheme of things, didn’t it?
There was more change in the first 10 years of the 20th century than the entire 19th century – when my grandfather was born, people were using horses to get around and a flying machine was an impossible deream, yet he not only saw the advent of cars, but watched a man walk on the moon before he died. Wonderful, yet scary, time to be alive – hang on tight, it’ll be a wild ride!