Suffer the Little Children

Israel started vaxxing young children in late November, as did Canada and the United States. Reports out of the UK suggest it may start there in Spring.  I see from this morning’s news that the TGA here has “provisionally approved” Pfizer for 5- to 11-years-olds.

Only one child under 12 years has died with Covid in Australia and that child in Victoria, sadly, had serious comorbidities. So, what exactly is the rationale for vaccinating Australian children?

In a recent article on the-pipeline (a North American site) I quoted Dr. Eric Rubin, professor of immunology at Harvard, and a member of the FDA advisory committee. When asked, prior to FDA approval, about the safety of the Pfizer vaccine for children, he replied, “we’re never going to learn about how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it. That’s just the way it goes.”

The question I posed and will pose again: why are children akin to lab rats among those on the left? The median age of those dying from Covid is 85+ years. The only rationale, therefore, for experimenting on children is to save the old. This kind of thinking is so at odds from the moral standards of the quite recent past and from common decency that it’s mindboggling.

There is no medical justification for vaccinating young children against Covid.  Older children too for that matter. They face no risk to speak of from the virus. Nothing of certainty is known about the risks they face from the vaccines. Outside of these abnormal and hysterical times, the vaccines would not be given to children. If the principal rationale is to inhibit the spread of the virus among adults, it’s grotesque and unconscionable. “Close enough to evil to scare me,” I said in the article I referenced above.

33 thoughts on “Suffer the Little Children”

  1. The median age of those dying from Covid is 85+ years. The only rationale, therefore, for experimenting on children is to save the old.

    That’s one rationale.
    If we lived in a society that hadn’t just legislated Euthanasia and hadn’t been practicing the Liverpool Pathway for?how long? then that rationale might be vaguely plausible.
    But we’re not.
    So, the only conclusion is that the Covid Vaccine was intended to be used on children from the get go.


    Report comment

    12
  2. Speaking of experiments:
    If we drained half the blood of children-of-no-consequence (CONCs), and replaced that volume with blood from Children-of-Greatness (COGs) (manufactured in a lab, of course), would that resolve the white privilege issue?

    Of course, we’d have to drain ’em as soon as they spawned, I mean … were born.

    Sorry. A bit off-topic I know, but I wanted to talk about solutions.


    Report comment

    2
  3. What could possibly go wrong …

    Team builds first living robots – that can reproduce

    “This is profound” says Levin.
    These cells have the genome of a frog, but, freed from becoming tadpoles, they use their collective intelligence, a plasticity, to do something astounding.”

    “These are frog cells replicating in a way that is very different from how frogs do it.
    No animal or plant known to science replicates in this way,” says Sam Kriegman, Ph. D., the lead author …

    https://wyss.harvard.edu/news/team-builds-first-living-robots-that-can-reproduce/?s=09

    … bring in those kids, we have a new mandated vaccine.


    Report comment

    6
  4. I have no doubt it is evil. It is insane.
    Anyone trying to justify vaccinating children has serious, mental cognitive problems.
    It’s ok though because they were on the ABC. Home away from home.
    It’s not funny anymore.
    Talking doesn’t cut it anymore does it?


    Report comment

    15
  5. Only one child under 12 years has died with Covid in Australia and that child in Victoria, sadly, had serious comorbidities. So, what exactly is the rationale for vaccinating Australian children?

    Simple: Cull the population, and of those that remain, enslave them.


    Report comment

    16
  6. As far as I’m concerned now any remote chance of a rational debate with someone has evaporated. I have tried, but it’s just a waste of time. I get told constantly the vaxx are fully approved, tested etc. Saying check for yourself does not work. I don’t bother anymore.
    Not very often I’d agree with Leunig, but he summed it up perfectly.


    Report comment

    17
  7. When asked, prior to FDA approval, about the safety of the Pfizer vaccine for children, he replied, “we’re never going to learn about how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it. That’s just the way it goes.”

    this used to be called a trial, obviously we have moved on from these archaic processes


    Report comment

    17
  8. This is simply about big pharma chasing easy profits, and will become The example of regulator capture studied in the future. It takes years for the scientific consensus to turn, and all the funding is only for one side.
    moderated

    5
  9. Psychopathic lunatics. Like the priests of Baal. Give them some of their own medicine. Make them lab rats. Then sacrifice them in fire. Then hang them.


    Report comment

    11
  10. So, what exactly is the rationale for vaccinating Australian children?

    Compliance. Or else. Shipped off to a WellKamp, you (and all your family) will be.


    Report comment

    13
  11. There is no medical justification for vaccinating young children against Covid. Older children too for that matter. They face no risk to speak of from the virus.

    I have seen leftists who know all this put on the moral cloak of self-righteousness and maintain that it is necessary to vaccinate even young children “to prevent them passing Covid onto others” (i.e. adults), even those “others” who are already double-vaxxed.
    So as far those people are concerned, it’s nothing to do with what’s best for children, it’s a case of being more concerned for their elders.
    Never mind using children as guinea pigs.

    It is most definitely “unconscionable” and evil.


    Report comment

    22
  12. Don’t worry, the ‘vaccine’ is optional for children.
    Unless you want to keep them in school, then there will be no choice, unless you have the means to begin home schooling.


    Report comment

    12
  13. is this a process to normalise the removal of rights and the acquiesence of government decreed process?

    how long before some bright spark decides that having an ongoing “emergency” allows the goverment of the day, to enact climate change directives?

    far fetched?

    I never would have believed anyone 2 years ago if they siad we’d be where we are today .. it was too far fetched

    or has everyone else relaised this and I’m just a tad slow?


    Report comment

    25
  14. billie says:
    December 5, 2021 at 7:24 pm
    is this a process to normalise the removal of rights and the acquiesence of government decreed process?

    how long before some bright spark decides that having an ongoing “emergency” allows the goverment of the day, to enact climate change directives?

    far fetched?

    Once their vaccine passports are in place (100% vaxxed) and cash is eliminated, you will only be allowed to buy approved amounts of various items (or none at all) via your vaccine passport..

    No meat – only worm meal. $10 worth of fuel a week – if you can afford to own a car.

    They will not have to convince people of a “climate emergency”- merely declare the same & bring in the controls.


    Report comment

    24
  15. Fat Tony says:

    They will not have to convince people of a “climate emergency”- merely declare the same & bring in the controls.

    The response to the crisis IS all the evidence required to prove that the crisis IS a crisis (as declared), and requires a crisis-magnitude response. Only those who wish to prolong the crisis, disagree or question the evidence (the response) that is plain for all to see.


    Report comment

    9
  16. They need to flood the data with a cohort of vaccinated they hope will be less likely to die or experience serious illness to bring the overall averages down, especially the younger age brackets where the vaccine injuries are starting to be noticed.

    Also, the older decision makers are just shit scarred of having their comfortable lives threatened by pesky kids.


    Report comment

    9
  17. Close enough to evil to scare me

    It is evil. There is only Good and evil. This is not a false binary as actions/words/thoughts can only be one or the other. We all know it is not good, therefore it is evil.
    Not only is it evil, it’s extremely evil, Carthage level of evilness – knowingly sacrificing the children, as some will die and others be permanently disabled or have a significantly reduced lifespan. They know this, yet they continue. They cannot claim ignorance and neither can we on their nature.


    Report comment

    9
  18. So, the only conclusion is that the Covid Vaccine was intended to be used on children from the get go.

    Bill Gates was musing to Dr. Frankenstein about vaccinating everyone in the world in around 2006. It was always intended for everyone. The starting point should be that the virus was the excuse – the vaccine is the main game.


    Report comment

    6
  19. Have the Israelis been victims of affinity fraud? They seem so taken in by Pfizer. Why would they give this to their children?

    Really good question. I have been wondering along these lines from the beginning when they rushed in to force their population to get vaxed. Surely to goodness they of all people would have some hesitation in letting their people be used as lab rats.


    Report comment

    6
  20. “or has everyone else relaised this and I’m just a tad slow”?

    Sorry, it’s you.

    Why do you think the name was changed to “Climate emergency”.


    Report comment

    3
  21. “…..why are children akin to lab rats among those on the left?”

    I suspect that they may be riffing on the old Jesuit thing about, “Give me the boy at four and I will show you the man at eight”, or words to that effect. Or, (AND??), they are just plain psychotic.

    It is also entirely reasonable to assume that most of the sort of degenerates that float such plans are themselves “childless”

    Death-cultists. However, as they say in the classics:

    “The future belongs to those who turn up”.

    So, the Baalists / Morloch-worshipers have no (fore) skin in the game, so to speak. If only these vermin would shut up and simply be the last in their genetic line, things would be much better, but, no, because they are so utterly debased, they want to “cancel” the fundamental genetic imperative.

    Their own assumed sanctimony is their “guiding light” and, as Voltaire astutely noted:

    “Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.”


    Report comment

    7
  22. “The state wants control of children.”

    Ironically, in the US it was COVID lockdowns that allowed parents to see exactly what their kids were being taught and when they protested, the FBI started looking at them as “domestic terrorists”.
    Which all went down like a lead balloon.
    Moral to the story: don’t piss off mothers of school kids, it’s gonna cost you at the next election – big time.
    Moral 2: if you want to fight any of the vax stuff (kids, mandates, passports etc), we need school mums on-side.
    Maybe some simple facts like:
    the vax is 174 times more likely to have an adverse reaction for kids than them getting COVID (1/1,000 vs 1/174,000);
    In Florida, with no vax or mask mandates for schools, and schools open all of 2020 and 2021, no different for kids getting COVID than anywhere else in the USA, and teachers were no more likely to get COVID than any other sub-section of the general community in Florida (which currently has the lowest COVID case rate in the USA, due to “winter” being outdoors time in Florida, while it’s indoors time in NY – something which the media exploited for “summer” where the in/out was reversed, but ignores now)


    Report comment

    5

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *