29 thoughts on “Meme of the Day #24”

  1. Imagine if Tulsi Gabbard changed brands and ran with Donald Trump (or Ron DeSantis) as vice-president in 2024. Superb entertainment — and no amount of cheating would be able to stop them winning! You’d be able to hear Pelosi’s head explosions on Pluto.


    Report comment

    14
  2. Victoria Nuland’s answer to Rubio [@47:10], in which at no time does she ever imply that the labs are under the control of the USA.
    https://youtu.be/aYSkNtUBjsw?t=2830
    Exact quote: “We are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into Russian hands as they approach.”

    I don’t know who first started the innuendo that the USA “has” biolabs in Ukraine, but it wasn’t Nuland no matter how many claim Nuland is their source.
    If the USA has bioweapons labs in Ukraine, we are still waiting for a fact that confirms it.


    Report comment

  3. Colonel Crispin Berkasays:
    March 15, 2022 at 8:24 pm
    Victoria Nuland’s answer to Rubio [@47:10], in which at no time does she ever imply that the labs are under the control of the USA.
    https://youtu.be/aYSkNtUBjsw?t=2830
    Exact quote: “We are working with the Ukrainians on how they can prevent any of those research materials from falling into Russian hands as they approach.”

    I don’t know who first started the innuendo that the USA “has” biolabs in Ukraine, but it wasn’t Nuland no matter how many claim Nuland is their source.
    If the USA has bioweapons labs in Ukraine, we are still waiting for a fact that confirms it.

    That would have a lot to do with the USA having funded them. Although mysteriously much of the information has been scrubbed…
    Lucky someone use the internet achive.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20170130193016/https://photos.state.gov/libraries/ukraine/895/pdf/dtro-kharkiv-eng.pdf

    https://web.archive.org/web/20210511164310/https://photos.state.gov/libraries/ukraine/895/pdf/dtro-luhansk-eng.pdf

    https://web.archive.org/web/20170221125752/https://photos.state.gov/libraries/ukraine/895/pdf/dtro-dnipropetrovsk-eng.pdf

    https://web.archive.org/web/20210506053014/https://photos.state.gov/libraries/ukraine/895/pdf/dtro-vinnitsa-eng.pdf

    https://web.archive.org/web/20170221125752/https://photos.state.gov/libraries/ukraine/895/pdf/dtro-dnipropetrovsk-eng.pdf

    https://web.archive.org/web/20170207122550/https://photos.state.gov/libraries/ukraine/895/pdf/dtro-kherson-fact-sheet-eng.pdf

    https://web.archive.org/web/20170223011502/https://photos.state.gov/libraries/ukraine/895/pdf/dtro-ternopil-fact-sheet-eng.pdf

    https://web.archive.org/web/20170208032526/https://photos.state.gov/libraries/ukraine/895/pdf/dtro-zakarpatska-fact-sheet-eng.pdf

    https://web.archive.org/web/20170208032526/https://photos.state.gov/libraries/ukraine/895/pdf/dtro-zakarpatska-fact-sheet-eng.pdf

    https://web.archive.org/web/20170202040923/https://photos.state.gov/libraries/ukraine/895/pdf/dtro-lviv-dl-eng.pdf

    https://web.archive.org/web/20170201004446/https://photos.state.gov/libraries/ukraine/895/pdf/dtro-lviv-rdvl-eng.pdf

    https://web.archive.org/web/20161230143004/https://photos.state.gov/libraries/ukraine/895/pdf/dtro-eidss.pdf

    https://web.archive.org/web/20210506212717/https://photos.state.gov/libraries/ukraine/895/pdf/dtro-pathogen-asset-control.pdf

    https://web.archive.org/web/20170207153023/https://photos.state.gov/libraries/ukraine/895/pdf/dtro-dnipropetrovsk-rdvl_eng.pdf

    https://web.archive.org/web/20170211022339/https://photos.state.gov/libraries/ukraine/895/pdf/kiev-ivm-fact-sheet-eng.pdf
    moderated

    6
  4. Rubio is a Shill, he’s given Noodles the opportunity for some Limited Hangout that can later be walked back.
    What’s Tulsi Gabbard’s claim to fame, though?
    WEF Young Leader, no accomplishments in Congress, Spook, by any chance?


    Report comment

  5. Wasn’t Victoria Nuland the architect behind the whole Euromaiden false flag coup, and then the installing of the Ukrainian corrupt government?

    I am hearing on the grapevine that the US and NATO are not planning a false flag chemical attack in Ukraine to be the trigger to bring NATO into the war.


    Report comment

    1
  6. AS for Tulsi Gabbard — wouldn’t trust her as far as I can spit a grand piano — she knew all about those bio-labs how come she’s only speaking up now — the honesty bug is very selective in its bite — it only bites those no longer attached to the taxpayer teat — typical politician


    Report comment

    8
  7. It’s interesting to see how the Demoncrats and their supporters are now calling for Tucker Carlson and Tulsi Gabbard to be charged for treason because they are raising valid points about the conflict. No hypocrisy to see here.


    Report comment

    6
  8. “I don’t know who first started the innuendo that the USA “has” biolabs in Ukraine, but it wasn’t Nuland no matter how many claim Nuland is their source.”

    You need to parse her comments very carefully.

    Q: Does Ukraine have bio-weapons labs?
    A: Ukraine has bi-research labs.
    Yeah – bio-weapons labs are a subclass of bio-research labs, are they not?

    Funded to some extent and for unstated purposes by the US.
    And the US built new bio-labs.
    Note that they say “no foreign bio-labs” – what does that mean? Foreign to Ukraine, foreign to US, foreign to both, run by non-Ukraine, run by non -US?

    And the US funders of bio-labs are “concerned” that Russia will obtain the research and pathogens in those labs.
    Yet, oddly, they were screaming for months that Putin would invade, and somehow didn’t bother to secure the contents of those labs – the contents they are now concerned may be “obtained” by the Russians.
    Incompetence or deliberate?

    And they have a history of lying about it – as per previous ‘fred, went from “no labs”, to “labs, but not ours”, to “some labs are ours” etc. As Carlson said, even the EU was claiming that bio-labs in the Ukraine was “Russian disinformation”.

    Notice too, the Dorothy-dixer question – to paraphrase both and A: Q:”If the bio-weapons were to be released, would this be the fault of the Russians?” A: “Yes, definitely”.

    All seems very convenient to their “Russia bad” distraction squirrel – they can’t afford the MSM and the people to be thinking too much about inflation, the border crisis (another new record there this month – 68% increase over last year), record Gov debt of 130% odd of GDP, record tax incomes, huge budget deficits, massive printing of money (more than 50% off all US$ printed in last 2 years), COVID issues (as per ova ‘freds) and so on. Got to go the “ra ra – USA” patriotism “we all need to pull together against the enemy” – while the establishment grubs (both sides) make millions from their “lucky” investments in Ukraine, the military industrial complex, the medical industrial complex and so on.

    Are they outright evil, or just unimaginably greedy and indifferent to the consequences of their actions? Is that a significant difference anyway?


    Report comment

    6
  9. Tulsi is an interesting one.

    Aesthetically I would say she belongs more on the right than the left.

    And when I say aesthetically I refer to the fact she is passing her thirties and still attractive, stylish, and looks like she takes care of herself.

    On the left they buy expensive clothes and count on that to do the work for them.

    Compare the women at a Trump rally, or marching for some freedom or other, to their equivalents on the left. The former tend to look significantly better – better groomed, comfortable in themselves, happier, and healthier. This is part of the spirit whereby rightwing rallies look like big parties. Happy people.

    Women on the left have a brief spring in their 20’s when all they have to do to look attractive is turn up. Beneath it they are cultivating levels of hate and bitterness, a loathing of the sweetness of living. When the veil of youth is whisked away they you get to see the ravages that all that hatred, bitterness, sadistic appetite, and jealousy has wrought.


    Report comment

    6
  10. “…calling for Tucker Carlson and Tulsi Gabbard to be charged for treason…”

    Such charges are very difficult to make stick in the US – treason is the only crime defined by the US constitution. Without a formal war under way (declaration of war or overt kinetic war) – and there isn’t one with Russia- they would never be convicted, and probably not even indicted. Any such investigation would fail at the first hurdle – no war with Russia, therefore Russia is not technically an “enemy”, therefore “treason” is impossible for “aiding” Russia in any way.

    The founders of the US were very clever – they knew the possibility of a treason charge being politically weaponised as now, and made sure that was not going to happen. These calls are either from ignorance of the US constitution itself, or are just political show.


    Report comment

    2
  11. Such charges are very difficult to make stick in the US

    Clearly neither are in any real danger of being charged for treason, but it’s the extent that the Left are prepared to go to silence anyone who raises uncomfortable questions and to control the narrative.


    Report comment

    4
  12. Defenders of Carlson might like to note that Russian propaganda bureaucrats have actively promoted his contributions in support of Putin’s invasion.
    On the biolabs, USSR biolabs in Ukraine were taken over by US and have been progressively closed. Not that some of those commentators here will be interested.
    Continuing blather in support of Putin here is remarkable.


    Report comment

  13. All Gabbard actually SAID was that there were labs in Ukraine dealing with potentially dangerous pathogens. She did NOT mention the development of biological weapons. Usual liberal hysteria.


    Report comment

    4
  14. I should add that it is quite inconceivable that a country that has had nuclear weapons for about fifty years would not have access to ‘dangerous pathogens’. Furthermore, how likely is it that the US Government would leave the development of biological weapons in the hands of a private group of oddballs working in a virology institute in China? Or strewn around the fields in Ukraine? Give me a break.


    Report comment

    3
  15. …how likely is it that the US Government would leave the development of biological weapons in the hands of a private group of oddballs working in a virology institute in China? Or strewn around the fields in Ukraine?

    Noting the events that have unfolded and the facts that have been revealed, it’s more than just likely, it’s a given.


    Report comment

    1
  16. “Noting the events that have unfolded and the facts that have been revealed, it’s more than just likely, it’s a given.”

    Of course – if you’re not allowed to do it yourself, pay someone else to do it and hide that you’re paying them. Easy peasy.


    Report comment

    1
  17. Furthermore, how likely is it that the US Government would leave the development of biological weapons in the hands of a private group of oddballs working in a virology institute in China? Or strewn around the fields in Ukraine? Give me a break.

    Given that we are talking about the U.S. government and its execrable State Department (and all their furious denials) I would say it’s more than likely.


    Report comment

    2
  18. Dick Ed

    WEF Young Leader, no accomplishments in Congress, Spook, by any chance?

    In your fantasy world, are there any people who are not “spooks”?


    Report comment

    2
  19. Interesting question: why has Russian sanctions strategy fixed solely on Democrats? Are they trying to confirm that certain people (DeSantis etc) were in on the electoral scam? Or is the Kremlin actually a Democrat false flag operation?
    Putin is proving daily that he’s incompetent.


    Report comment

  20. why has Russian sanctions strategy fixed solely on Democrats? Are they trying to confirm that certain people (DeSantis etc) were in on the electoral scam? Or is the Kremlin actually a Democrat false flag operation?

    You might want to re-read your Script for the day before typing, Littlest Anklebiter…


    Report comment

    1
  21. Living the dream
    Putin is not incompetent.
    He has gone too far.
    But the pile from on from the leftist because he called Obama an idiot for adopting socialism, calling him out for wanting to hurt his people and his sensible answer why he his not shoving homosexuality on his people.
    Wha I cannot understand is how leftist forwarded idiotic arguments defending Putins threat of invasion. Eg Russia has been expanionist for 500 years, blood has to be spilt for society. To progress ( eg socialism).
    Leftist scolded the Ukrainians for talking up arms against Russia, Ewan McGregor in particular.
    Now he’s acted leftists for some reason don’t like it.
    Is it because Zelensky is a lawyer/actor like those useless twerps Clinton Obama, Blair, szonsky, macron treadeau.
    He has backed his currency with gold, offloaded $us for yuan and euros, provided oil, gas and fertiliser to western dependant countries.
    Further as a solder he is able to handle weaponry, defend himself and is proud of his country.
    Perhaps for The above reason the us press made up ridiculas lies as the Russian collusion.


    Report comment

    3
  22. Louis: Putin is completely incompetent. His strategy failed from the first day. He now is certain to lose, even if he wins the occupation.


    Report comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *