Having coffee on Friday and heard from one of the chaps who still watches the ABC that it was spruiking information that Uruguay (about 3.4 million people) now runs on close to 100 percent (?98%) renewable electricity. I said that this could not be true but, of course, wasn’t envisaging renewables in the form of hydro, thermal, and biomass. Together these that make up over 50 percent of electricity generation in Uruguay. Wind accounts for most of the rest, with a bit of solar in the mix. Apparently, the wind is fairly good in Uruguay which has a small land mass with a South Atlantic coastline.
The ABC spends a lot of time and resources finding and cherry-picking “facts” which suit its agenda. That is who they are in the staff collective. Only defunding and wholesale redundancies will solve the problem. There is Buckley’s chance of that. So I either ignore its presence or reflexively doubt any news or information finding its way to me which has come from the ABC. However, on this occasion, my sceptical response was based on hard reality, albeit on a false assumption that by renewables was meant mainly wind, sun, and batteries.
That hard reality is that you cannot run a power system on wind turbines, solar panels, and batteries. It simply can’t be done. It is completely infeasible. No need to overthink it. Dark clouds, dusk, night and dawn interrupt sunshine. The wind does not always blow. Wind droughts happen. And batteries can store much too little power for the buck.
Unfortunately, Chris Bowen was probably watching the ABC and came away with even more obsessively misplaced confidence that what Uruguay can do, Australia can do too. Never before have we had governments on a mission to make Australia’s uncompetitive. Sure governments in the past have erred and Labor governments have always been fond of inventing new unaffordable welfare programs and of over regulating, particularly in the labour market. But nothing like this. Destroying cheap reliable energy on which business depends and, worse, replacing it with energy systems which are intrinsically expensive and unreliable and which, to boot, effectively prevent cheap and reliable energy systems from ever being rebuilt. That scale of deliberate national self-harm is unique in the annals of time.
Major political parties on both sides of the aisle across all levels of government are suffering from the mass delusion that they can and must play a part in altering the climate. It brings the apocryphal tale of King Canute’s demonstration of his limitations into sharp focus. And to twist the metaphor, is it too late to turn the tide?
Even if Dutton were to win, the Libs are too weak and comprised to ditch the climate-change madness. Plus the Senate will stymie any material pullback. And then there is the ABC and the rest of the legacy media railing against sane policies. Per-capita income and the AUD are falling as we speak. Is prosperity slipping away? No worries cobber, she’ll be right. This is Australia. “Something will turn up.” Won’t it?
It just did…it’s called Donald Trump.
Whether the Liberals grasp the significance of the moment is another question.
and biomass
Every biomass project has been either knocked back or slow walked until investors pull the pin.
This.
Uruguay. Nice joint, did a three day jaunt.
Ate a looooot of beef off the asado. Burning wood.
They keep saying we can’t have more Hydro because there aren’t any suitable sites, but if you identified one they’d say no, there’s a legless lizard family living there that might be inconvenienced.
The Greens got their kick-start by protesting against Hydro plans in Tasmania. Now it’s de rigeur to praise the amount of hydro that Tassie has.
Try suggesting that the Dorrigo to Bellingen escarpment might channel some good amount of water through turbines and see how far you get.
But the biggest bit of denial is gas. Sorry, second biggest after coal.
Coal should be renovated and kept going.
Simples.
I know everyone has a negative to say about Abbott, but my beef is with the media.
Abbott wanted to plant more trees, the media said no.
Are they importing electricity? Interconnectors?
Yes.
A large minority is campaigning for a reduction in living standards for political reasons like “climate change” — a luxury political belief for rich people.
Among the new rich, there is no room for aspirational Australians. Our wealth must be shared with the human trash of the Third World via immigration — as long as they don’t have to live next to them and they’re shunted off to migrant suburbs the rich never have to visit.
It is still beyond my intellectual ability to understand the Franklin Dam and Tasmania’s power source.
i have known a few people who walked or tried to walk the Franklin trail. Never again, cold, wet, foot rot, hypothermic and cut to bits by the bushes.
A natural hydro dam supplying electricity which would have raised the water level behind it to cover whatever area.
As I understand the power supply, there are cables weighted by chains in Bass strait from the La Trobe valley, – what uses more materials,the dam or the cables.
WHAT supplies the most effective and least amount of power – the dam or la Trobe.
Wha provides the least amount of externalities,the dam or la Trobe.
What is the least riskier source of power , the dam or la Trobe.
Franklin dam set the worst precedent for the environment and for scientific development.
.
“The Wind Always Blows On TV” just doesn’t sound right, so:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a3ir9HC9vYg
Prosperity is demonstrably slipping away in Australia, but also the UK, Canada, Germany, France, Netherlands, much of the EU. We see this clearly since 2019 which wasn’t too bad a year, but it goes back to 2008/09, 2012, 2015, 2018, 2020 -23 and 2024.
as well as Net Zero, this is due to bad monetary policy. Since 2014 we’ve had stagnation, inflation, stagflation and what might well be a recession in 2025. This is down to crack handed incompetence by central banks, feckless government spending and the rapid growth of the public sector.
As Jim Callaghan, a former Labour Prime Minister once had to admit: the party’s over. As in 1979 when Mrs Thatcher and President Reagan swept to power with a new focus on these issues, we may be saved by messrs Trump and Milei.
Well st least it will solve the immigration problem.