The process of humiliation continues.
Someone’s making excuses for their partisanship. “Look at what they made us do.”
- Open Thread – Mon 20 Jan 2025
- Open Thread – Weekend 18 Jan 2025
- Guest Post: Mem – The Ratchet Effect of Power-Price Increases
- Will the wind warriors become social outcasts?
- Open Thread – Thurs 16 Jan 2025
Rachel Vindman has bee whining about that error! hah.
More prez pardon questions: Shirley the crime(s) must be specified? yes/no? Is there a precedent for unspecified crime pardons?
I need to ask around and do some research. Who is this independent Suzie Holt who is running in Groom?…
I delivered their printer paper. I was the IT guy. I took the uber eats from the front desk to…
I see they’ve now blurred her face.
I noticed that also. Saw the pic earlier today. Perhaps mummy wasn’t impressed that “daddy”, took their little one to the “Ball”.
have to train them young
Reading the article it says “mum opened her home….”. There really is no hope for these poor kids. At least the child is a girl so the gaymen are unlikely to be interested. We all know what mum is going to look like without even seeing a pic of her.
At the risk of being called hurty names by the mean grls, I’m not going to jump to any conclusion based on one photograph. I’m happy to be corrected, but I doubt a child of that age would be able to interpret any complex meaning from what she is witnessing.
I’m also not going to jump to the conclusion that because people participate in a lifestyle I don’t understand or share, those people in the presence of a child will hold or act upon immoral thoughts. Without further information, it is neither possible nor desirable to come to that conclusion. If the men in the photo are known well by the girl’s family, it’s possible that if they saw someone behaving inappropriately, they might very well beat the sh!t out of him. Who knows?
It’s not surprising that the photo has gained plaudits from the same people who are promoting their event. Thanks to Andy Ngo – one of few with actual guts step into the ring – they’ve probably gained a heck of a lot more airtime than they might have been expecting.
Iconic and meaningful to whom exactly? the prats of the left
The point, Muddy, is that children shouldn’t witness people in S&M gear, nor should we think that this was ordinary public behaviour.
I understood the point, dover, but I feel that reactive posts such as this simply feed our opponents’ narrative. If they were dressing the child in gear like their own, that would be a different matter entirely.
I’m aware I use the collective ‘we’ far too much, but I wish that ‘we’ would realise that by continuing to permit our opponents to set the rules, and then react to the same, there can be no positive, measurable, outcome. The only way to conquer is by taking and maintaining the initiative.
These type of posts are Pavlovian, and will take us nowhere. We are chasing our own tails.
This post is only one side of the reversal that is required. You must point out the problem with the current situation, and you also have to point towards the solution to the current problem. We must not fear what the Left will say in response to our pointing out the problem since they will oppose whatever we say anyway.
Further, I disagree that responding to such an photo and the award is Pavlovian. The Left engage in such a manner, not to provoke a response of derision or contempt, but of passive acceptance and humiliation because of the further degradation of mores tolerating this silently engenders. It is of a piece with Dalrymple’s point regarding communist propaganda/ political correctness: