Yesterday, twostix posted on the OOT this very interesting study, WHO and the pandemic flu “conspiracies”, published in the British Medical Journal over a decade ago. It looked at the many connections between research scientists, national and international public health officials, and BigPharma, and how they were implicated in the development of responses to future pandemics, from the purchase of antivirals and vaccines to the determination of their efficacy and safety. Here are some quotes:
The WHO maintained this 2 billion estimate even after the winter season in Australia and New Zealand showed that only about one to two out of 1000 people were infected. Last but not least, it changed the very definition of a pandemic.” WHO for years had defined pandemics as outbreaks causing “enormous numbers of deaths and illness” but in early May 2009 it removed this phrase—describing a measure of severity—from the definition.
And:
The group’s policy plan for 2006-10 specifically stated that government representatives needed to “take measures to encourage the pharmaceutical industry to plan its vaccine/antivirals production capacity in advance” and also to “encourage and support research and development of pandemic vaccine” and to “develop a policy for antiviral stockpiling.” It also added that government representatives needed to know that “influenza vaccination and use of antivirals is beneficial and safe.” It said that the group provided “evidence based, palatable information”; and also “networking/exchange with other stakeholders (eg, with industry in order to establish pandemic vaccine and antivirals contracts).” In the meantime, in Roche’s own marketing plan, one goal was to “align Roche with credible third party advocates”. They “leveraged these relationships by enlisting our third-party partners to serve as spokespeople and increase awareness of Tamiflu and its benefits.”
Sounds very familiar doesn’t it. It would be very interesting to find out the connections of those addressing the public about the safety and efficacy of vaccines or antivirals might have to BigPharma, or to the government that is mandating the use of vaccines. The latter is not addressed in the article but my recent experience, involving a Q&A relating to the vaccines and the government mandate in Victoria put together by a very well-known corporation operating Australia-wide suggests it’s also a potential conflict of interest. The Q&A included a number of panelists, two company men, while the rest included Department of Health public servants, and a Professor, who receives funding from the Department of Health. You can guess the advice the staff were being given.
RTWT.
This:
Busy little beavers aren’t they. And where there are lobbyists there is nice yummy political donation money.
Friday “Humor”: Vaccine Efficacy ‘Science’ Explained (15 Oct)
That’s a great video, Bruce.
All other arguments aside; I am unable to comprehend how, in the early days of the wuflu, New York City stacked infected patients into care homes for the infirm. It was unforgivable and remains a mystery to me. Little wonder confidence is shaken.
@gab might have someone who can help will dm you on twitter
Bother
Several months ago, the media reported deaths from vaccines (using editorially imposed phrases like “extremely rare” and “vanishingly small”).
They no longer do. It has obviously been banned.
Gab, you seem to have a few possibilities arising. If nothing pans out for you, you might consider the spare room at Villa Megs. It comes with significant downsides that include an agnostic but well read lapsed Roman Catholic together with a currently lazy housekeeper who has reverted to childhood escapism with a book 18/24, has lost interest in cooking meals and has stopped putting the ironing board away. And that’s just for starters.
But, it’s there if it comes to that.
I see rosie has led me stray into the wrong thread.
Double bother, I should use my patented thread compass to avoid these embarrassing lapses.
C.L., they reported today, in Victoria, a 50-year old woman as a COVID death even though she had a ‘number of conditions’. They wouldn’t go further into the particulars, obviously. What do you think the chances of someone with a ‘number of conditions’ dying a few days after receiving the vaxx being recorded as a death following an adverse reaction to the vaxx? The question answers itself.
Once again today, no details on the number of vaccinated people who died in Victoria. Also no information on the number of vaccinated in ICU. Instead, this neat dodge:
The death of the boy also sounds highly suspicious:
Oh, it was a 15-year old. Even more suspicious. A day doesn’t pass without them lying by omission.
I’m not going to agonise over the reporting in Victoria.
We can take obfuscation as a given but as there are what? 20k total cases in a population of 5.5 million, I’m not going to much care about how individual cases of ‘died with covid’ are reported or the popular meme ‘vaxxs cause covid’.
The end of lockdowns is coming and we will all get the opportunity to get up close and personal with it.
Steven Waterson’s article is the only one I’ve read with any great sense recently.
Kind of related: I can’t believe Big Australia maniacs have chosen this time (of all times) to advocate squashing another three of four million people into Sydbourne.
And Scotty and Joshy will do it too, because the Ponzi scheme needs a boost and those wages have to be kept nice and low.
It must have been a complete coincidence that Drive had the following segment on Tues, Calls for Australia to bring in two million migrants over next five years.
If people don’t see the relation, they will do this in part to kickstart the Ponzi scheme as well as replace those that choose to remain unvaxxed, for whatever reason, and have consequently been excluded from productive employment.
Reading the latest on the escalating virus cases in Victoristan, Chairman Dan and his cohorts, methinks, are starting to get worried. Not only are the case numbers growing, they are growing amongst the vaccinated.
The latest ABC report states that almost 90% weren’t ‘fully vaccinated’ and most of the others were the very elderly (and no mention of comorbidities with the others, except for the 15 year old). What will the Chairman do when the miracle vaccination number, or greater, of the population of Victoristan is reached and cases don’t decline as has been so long intimated?
CL, Transport for NSW (what moron came up with that mouthful??) advertises all roles with a spiel about Sydney growing to 12, that’s TWELVE million people by 2050.
Anything less than a 50 storey apartment block next to Lucy Turnbull’s house is inadequate.
Sydney growing to 12, that’s TWELVE million people by 2050.
Thank goodness I’ll be out of here before 2030.
TBW, I believe the “Transport for NSW” logo has a revered heritage going all the way back to 1788.
Easy; Dictator Dan will just blame it on the dwindling unvaccinated.
It’s never his fault, always someone else’s.
His tactic all along is to divide the population, turn people against each other, and demonize any opposition to his authority.
It just goes to show what an evil authoritarian POS he is, he wants people to dob others in for the least infraction against laws he made up.
Reading the latest on the escalating virus cases in Victoristan, Chairman Dan and his cohorts, methinks, are starting to get worried. Not only are the case numbers growing, they are growing amongst the vaccinated.
Around the world #cases has tracked #vaxed, why should Victoria be any different?
Strange how it’s all happening even before “opening up”.
The Medical-Industrial Complex is far more powerful than the Military- Industrial Complex.
C.L. and DoB
re immigration
Your assuming all these immigrants will increase the existing population.
What if they are just replacements?
Don’t worry Megan, so far I’ve only ever noticed one cat being abused for the not infrequent, very human error of posting in the wrong threads, and that person is not you. 😉 … now, speaking of which, this went in the open thread but it’s too important a detail to get flooded out there –
Lawyer Discusses Health Equity Being Pushed In America
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHZwexprG98
Premiered Oct 16, 2021
FreedomProject Media
Dr. Duke Pesta sits down with Daniel Lennington, special counsel for Wisconsin Institute For Law & Liberty, to discuss the concept of health equity, which has been birthed from critical race theory. Health equity is the concept that there are different health outcomes for different races and treatment must be denied to some to benefit others.
Here’s a rather ominous statement about our quarantine centres (Victoria’s at least):
https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/is-the-mickleham-quarantine-facility-a-200-million-white-elephant-20211014-p58zxj.html
Someone has actually voiced it! Has Chairman Dan established Australia’s own Uyghur camp?
RobK;
Occams razor says:
“To kill off all the people taking up beds in the Homes.”
Having lived through so many chicken little scares through my lifetime I have acquired natural immunity to all the bullshit surrounding this shamdemic.
And I am much happier now that Gladbags has been given the arse.
“Occams razor says:
“To kill off all the people taking up beds in the Homes.””
Much more likely to be: to free up hospital beds so that DJT doesn’t get any credit for saving lives.
Yes, he really is that disgusting a human being. And when your brother works for CNN and advises you on media stuff, it’s much easier to work the spin – you’ll notice that Cuomo didn’t resign because of the nursing home death sentence he created that killed 15,000 people, but instead because he made “inappropriate” moves on women, at least some of whom weren’t amenable to “hush money”.
They will run over the planned intake until they reach a nett of 2-300k increase. As per pre-covid. It’s a given.
And no admonishing of CL for the low wages comment either JC? Lol, WAP.