Slowly but surely, evidence is emerging that the COVID vaccines are not fit for purpose. Once you focus on all-cause mortality rather than COVID deaths alone, the picture changes remarkably.
His colleague, Prof Neil, explains the situation in this thread:
Here is a longer discussion by Prof Fenton here:
Thank you sir, that is an excellent lecture by the professor. By using a bit of logic one can figure out the real effect from this supposed dreaded all encompassing killer by obtaining the actual deaths from all causes from data published over the last five or ten years years and comparing those figures to the figures for all causes of death in the last couple of years, and to put it bluntly, there is bugger all difference. We have been sold a pup.
An excellent analogy for what we are observing is made in [15] where the challenge is to get from a foxhole to a bunker, which is protective against artillery but to get to the bunker you must cross a minefield where you are exposed to accurate and deadly sniper fire. The second vaccine is like the bunker, while those in the foxhole are like the unvaccinated; those who die when crossing the minefield are classified as fox-hole deaths
I suspect Neil and his colleagues are about to become unpersons.
They certainly seem to have declared war on the UK establishment – taking aimed shots at UKHSA, ONS, and one of the doyens of British statistics, Sir David Spiegelhalter.
Still, Norman Fenton’s a big enough beast to take it.
There’s one interesting note from the paper – actually referring to the chart in Professor Neil’s tweet shown above:
In line with the fact that the data does not reveal excess mortality compared to previous years, we see no direct evidence of overall excess mortality caused by vaccine side effects in the data. The spikes in mortality that appear to occur soon after vaccination may be caused by the infirm, moribund, and severely ill receiving vaccination in priority order and thus simply appearing to hasten deaths that might otherwise have occurred later in the year.
On the back of that heresy, I expect the authors are in for a spot of 360° condemnation and othering.
If you want to see the effectiveness of these so called vaccines, one has to only look as far as …… Melbourne.
According to Vic Health data, since October 1st 2021 they roughly average 1200 cases per day and in excess of 500 people have died in the same age groups as last year. The only difference between this years non-interest story vs last years’ disaster is that over 80% of the population is vaccinated this year.
Yet people still cling to hope that these “vaccines” work.
It took me a while to digest the paper, but worth it. I think its saying that mortality from all causes is not increased by Covid but is increased by vaccination. If that is true then the entire raft Covid panic measures has done more damage than the disease itself. Thats pretty intuitive anyway.
Faaark indeed.
Then, there’s this:
Another floating Petri dish / booze-cruiser.
” I think its saying that mortality from all causes is not increased by Covid but is increased by vaccination.”
It’s all a numbers games, innit? Lies, damned lies and statistics.
And they wonder at the protests.
“We’re keeping you safe!” they say.
Sure. But who’ll protect us from you?
“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.” – C S Lewis
Dr. Bhakdi warned against mRNA vaccines very early on, and said booster shots just made them more dangerous – but that’s where the powers that be are now. Dr. Malone also had reservations.
Some websites call these people “dangerous”.
I call anyone wanting to mandate experimental vaccines “dangerous”, and doubly so if they want to inject those things into children as young as five, when there’s clearly no benefit in doing so, and discussing risks that do exist is called misinformation or worse.
Dear Dover0beach
Excess deaths by age group compared with the average of the previous 5 years for England and Wales (ONS all-cause mortality data) show a remarkable reduction to close to zero across the board and most notably for the 85+ age group in week 47. Data for 2020-21 graphed at:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189200946@N04/51736420743/
Cumulative graphs for 2015, 2018, 2020 and 2021 for total mortality and various age groups are collected here:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/189200946@N04/albums/72157720179030034
Week 47 graphs are the first 6 items, starting with total mortality and then broken down by age group, with further breakdown within the 0-44 year age group.
I suspect the bulk of the increased mortality in the 0-44 and 45-64 age groups probably reflects late diagnosis and delayed treatment of various conditions during last year’s and this year’s lockups.
There does not seem to be any compelling evidence that the mRNA injections have been successful: excess and total mortality have been higher this year than last year from mid-summer until a few weeks ago, as evidence in the two graphs in the last of the eight screenshots uploaded on 9 December.
DP
Leave a Reply