Has anyone Anyone seen the Benny Johnson video, Sam Bankman Fried tried to bribe Trump $5 billion NOT to run in 2024?

Pretty shocking stuff. At least this rucksack of shit which is Democrat meddling in the 2020 and 2024 is now fraying at the seams.

https://youtu.be/K_d1WFTb1Nc?feature=shared

I’m all ears if someone can explain to me the state of play between Hezbollah and Hamas, who now backs whom and if this has any shift in the regional powers client state base or their relative position & strength.

No city on earth has suffered actual carpet bombing since 1945.

Gaza is an excellent opportunity to break that streak.

It will be fascinating to see the reactions from certain suburbs of Sydney and Melbourne.

I know that certain schools will be increasing their already serious security.

The very fact that they have to is a disgrace for Australia.

And there was our PM courting the threateners only this week for support for his vanity project.

Iran finances both Hezbollah and Hamas.

Okay thanks. I think the regime and their military assets are deserving of reprisal. I wonder if that is what those lunatics want though?

100% Pogria- despicable is not a strong enough word when it comes to Pence

Who is this “Pence” person? I vaguely remember someone by that name having an uncanny knack of disappearing when most needed and reappearing when the coast was clear.

We call for the immediate cessation of violence. The protection of all civilians and upholding of international humanitarian law is essential.”

I’m sure Hamas will see sense now they’ve heard the calll from the country formerly known as New Zealand.

The ridiculousness of these simple minded droolers in charge is limitless. Sadly for us.

I stand with Israel and NZ can eff right off with its gratuitous and pointless advice.

Cassie,
I am surprised the Kiwis haven’t back pedaled on their announcement. Many other self-appointed commentators attacked Israel before they had it pointed out to them what actually occurred.
To wit, Laurence Tribe’s furious back pedaling. All these morons still can’t comprehend “the Internet is FOREVER”.

See also: The Voice as an example of what I mentioned in my 9.33 comment.

Plus almost every brain fart the left have tried to implement.

While perusing an IPA YouTube video on fake “fact checks”:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNdkWeV02_g
A comment by @JohnSmith-zo6ir caught my attention, reproduced in full below:

The Voice in NUMBERS for EVERYONE. Share to educate.

VOTE NO to Australian Apartheid, which is exactly what the Voice is.
It is SYSTEMIC racism without accountability.

Brilliant!

Apart from the Africa bit (Carpentarian Aboriginals are genetically related to the Veddas from Southern India/Sri Lanka) and the 30 – 39.5 billion discrepancy (the latter is the more correct amount) it is a brilliant summary. I think all will agree.

Emailed it to my NO campaign contacts, asking for a short information leaflet which can be spoken-to or preferably handed out (but would first require AEC approval) to the many low-or-no information voters out there.

Please distribute as widely as you can.

Further proof that the Third World War has started.

A waning Empire (the U.S.) has suffered a couple of humiliating defeats (Afghanistan, Ukraine).

Coupled with weak U.S. leadership, other countries/rising empires will seek to expand their interests in the coming years.

Those of us left once the dust settles will see that the official start to WW3 will be traced back to the Nordstream pipeline bombings…

The Aboriginal “sports star” has culturally appropriated (ie. stolen) a sport which has no cultural anchors in aboriginality.

I can’t understand why the aboriginals are even wearing clothes and shoes, driving cars. drinking beer and eating potato chips. All these things are “cultural appropriation”. I myself stay right away from items decorated with dot paintings. Of course, when reparations are due, there will be an accounting on our side of all the benefits accrued to aboriginals since 1778, won’t there. Should balance out, depending on the judge – oops, probably won’t then.

Trump:

“We Brought So Much Peace to the Middle East – Only to See Biden Whittle It Away” – President Trump Releases Statement on Hamas War on Israel (7 Sep)

Yep. He should’ve gotten the Nobel Peace Prize.

…biden, obama and the rest of them have literally destroyed the US and started WW111.

That was their aim.

Of course, Hamas will not be blamed for their loss, Bibi will.

I’ll blame them. Even if I’m the only person on the planet who does.

Yappers will yap, the truth remains the truth.

Has Alcosleezy and Wong condemned Hamas yet? Wouldn’t surprise me if these commie scumbags haven’t.

calli
Oct 8, 2023 10:09 AM
Of course, Hamas will not be blamed for their loss, Bibi will.

I’ll blame them. Even if I’m the only person on the planet who does.

Yappers will yap, the truth remains the truth.

1 1

A quick thumb down from someone, it seems that mUnty is lurking.

Thebthumb up was me.

I found that person’s portrait BJ.

Waiting, every day, every single comment. It is serious, despite some types mocking me about it.

And I don’t think it’s m0nty. I think he is above such things, preferring to take his lumps in person. This one is a coward.

The West has become steeped in a deadly cocktail of wokeness, of affluence, of vacuousness and of historical amnesia, caused by the collapse of its foundations, particularly the collapse of religion.

Europe is being invaded by Muslims – a Hamas-style incursion of barbarians that is destroying nations one by one – at the invitation of Brussels. Meanwhile, Brussels is encouraging the mass slaughter of white Christians in the east on the invented pretext that the invasion will come from Russia. The US is also being invaded – again, by invitation.

Last week, Macron announced that he wants the ‘right’ to an abortion in the French constitution.

The UN convened an emergency meeting to vote on a motion submitted by Iran condemning Israel for gaining support by assuming the role of victim.

I hope they can unite again after their year of political division over the High Court appointments. I am sure they will.

Netanyahu has invited Lapid and Gantz into a war coalition. I haven’t heard whether they’ve accepted yet. I hope they do, but it doesn’t look promising. The Left is pretty feral and hateful these days, and they detest Bibi.

Netanyahu, Lapid and Gantz discuss forming emergency government as country faces war (Times of Israel)

Opposition leader Lapid indicates PM will need to boot far right from coalition: ‘I’m willing to put aside our differences and form an emergency, narrow, professional government’

Not a statesmanlike way to start Mr Lapid.

Over 200 Jews dead, mainly civilians, not counting those taken into Gaza. This isn’t a war against an army, this is a war against a people, the Jewish people. This is about Nazis in 2023 annihilating the Jewish people. Read my lips.

Never again.

I do not understand why Israel such restrictive gun laws.

Turning Gaza into rubble would be satisfying but the hostages complicate everything.

The IDF doesn’t seem to be in a mood to accept complications…

6:15 P.M. — The hostage situation in Kibbutz Be’eri is said to have been resolved. All hostages have been rescued, while the militants have been “neutralized,” according Times of Israel, citing local media.

A lot of “neutralized” is going to be coming their way methinks.

This is an interesting article by Steve Waterson apologies if it has been posted previously:

Indigenous voice to parliament: It pains me to say so, but I see nothing to justify a Yes vote
STEVE WATERSON. – OCTOBER 6, 20231389 COMMENTS
I’m probably not Robinson Crusoe on this one, but I’ve been uneasy about the voice project from the moment it was sprung on us – Surprise, everybody! – on election night, sensing the hallmarks of this government already stamped on it: a repellent blend of doltish arrogance, incompetence and laziness.

I wondered, however, if there might be an underlying substance and gravity to it that I had missed; that it was more than just a litany of platitudes, a plea to position ourselves on the right side of history, whatever that gibberish means.

So a few months ago I set aside my misgivings to write a piece in these pages in which I tried, as fairly and sympathetically as I could, to set out the cases for both sides without making any judgment, without urging people to vote one way or the other, and without revealing my voting intentions.

It was partly to clarify my own views, but was primarily, given the rising temperature of the public rhetoric, an attempt to offer readers with more pressing concerns what I hoped was a measured summary of the arguments they might consider before casting their ballots; you know, precisely what this indolent apology for a government ought to have provided to us right from the start.

The article was not met, I confess, with universal acclaim. “Nice try, mate, but it’s still a No from me,” said one friend, which suggests my even-handedness had slightly overbalanced.

Another asked, rather ungraciously, “Have you removed all the splinters from your arse yet?” But it’s not always a mistake to sit on the fence for a while; if it’s high enough it gives you a pretty good view in all directions, although eventually you have to climb back down to earth on one side or the other.

For me, that side was No, for a variety of reasons I’ll go into in a moment, but that – hard as this may be to comprehend – I don’t accept were born of ignorance, fear or malice. I know many people who will vote Yes in the sincere belief that a voice will do everything its advocates promise, and I don’t denigrate anyone for having faith in that possibility; even less do I doubt their goodwill towards Indigenous Australians. Some have difficulty in reciprocating that courtesy, even though I think I share their goodwill, despite disagreeing about the most effective way of expressing it. But I can live with that.

Simply put, I fear the voice mechanism risks damage out of all proportion to any good it might do. It’s a painful conclusion to arrive at, but not because I’m tortured by feelings of unexpiated guilt or shame. No, my sorrow is that a plan purportedly designed to unite us has already caused, and will continue to cause, such bitter division. Regardless of the grandiose claims made for the purity of its origin, since it entered the political arena the voice process has been ill-conceived, badly expressed and poorly prosecuted.

This position will cost me one or two friends, and inspire a certain froideur in some of my colleagues: yet another miserable result of the Prime Minister’s forcing of this shallow binary choice upon us. It’s an argument we didn’t need to have, and I will neither understand nor forgive our politicians for inciting it. It has echoes of their inane Covid mantra: staying apart keeps us together. A scheme to split the country right down the middle and thereby, in a way beyond the ken of lesser minds, magically unite us. Astonishing with how little wisdom the world is run.

To be fair, I doubt I could ever have been persuaded to support the voice, even by smart people. (Does my memory fail me, or didn’t you once have to be clever to be a professor?) Its blurring of the very clear one-person, one-vote underpinning of liberal democracy was enough to lose me, although I can see how counterarguments could be advanced; and the dubious, murky method of selecting and separating us by ancestry seemed a backward step.

Perhaps I’m not bright enough to appreciate the subtlety of this unifying, equality-enhancing invitation, but a reform that gives a special right to people of only one group, whatever its supposed justification, appears to deny that right to those of any other group.

That alone is sufficient reason to reject it, but completely unacceptable is the presumptuous attempt to insert it – without, astonishingly, any consultation or debate – into the Constitution, which our deluded government seems to think it owns.

This is our nation’s founding document you halfwits are trying to scribble on, not the minutes of an ALP branch meeting.

In any event, the intransigence, dissimulation, bullying and now wheedling of the Yes proponents, starting with the Prime Minister, who stands head and shoulders below the rest, has made the decision easier. It’s a lesson we learn repeatedly from history: beware of small men making grand gestures.

It’s impossible, nevertheless, to disagree with the Yes camp – and indeed probably every thinking Australian – that what we’ve attempted so far to resolve lingering Aboriginal disadvantage hasn’t worked. If anyone has better ideas, let’s test them against reality and keep experimenting over and over, year after year if necessary, until we find one that works. The fact a cabal of self-styled leaders, activists and experts declares this particular half-baked, details-light model is our very last and only chance is reason for concern, not comfort.

Many prominent proponents of the Yes campaign speak with the supercilious confidence of people who are not accustomed to being challenged.

Over recent years it has become socially awkward, if not unacceptable, for a non-Indigenous person to voice an opinion on Aboriginal affairs. So for those who can trace their lineage wholly or partly to the continent’s pre-colonial inhabitants, that status has been a trump card to be played in any such discussion. It must come as a shock to them to discover their presumptive moral superiority does not confer immunity in this constitutional debate.

What has emerged is an unedifying release of pent-up vitriol. It’s claimed there are vicious actors on both sides of the argument, and there are indeed always zealots whose contributions aren’t helpful, but many Yes campaigners have played a singularly unattractive game.

They won’t see it that way, because to them it’s unarguable that to interrogate their case, to seek more information on any part of it, is racism, pure and simple. That has been an effective silencer in most previous encounters because the average person dreads that label; but the currency is devalued when it’s so freely thrown around, and especially when applied to people of manifest good faith.

The only reason anyone could think it acceptable, for example, to damn the readership of this newspaper as “borderline casual racists”, or to dismiss dissenting voices as stupid or ignorant, is because they inhabit an echo chamber populated by sycophants.

Whatever the perception of the partisans, I have read genuine concern, even anguish, in the now many thousands of comments our articles on both sides of the debate have provoked.

Here’s a thought: if you claim everyone who disagrees with you is a stupid racist, maybe you’re not the beacon of unification you imagine yourself to be.

Our government has reduced what should have been a thoughtful, probably lengthy and quite possibly dull evaluation of a significant constitutional amendment to simplistic moral posturing. And by equating rejection of the voice proposal to rejection of our Indigenous compatriots, it sends them a recklessly dishonest and destructive message.

Ordinary Australians don’t reject Indigenous people; they certainly don’t want their misery to continue; most, like me, would welcome all manner of attempts to address their problems. But please forgive those of us who are not convinced this particular avenue leads to the Promised Land. There’s an unassailable argument for change, but not this change.

What definitely hasn’t worked is maintaining unhappy groups of people outside mainstream Australian society, isolated, purposeless, helpless and dependent on government largesse to survive.

The brutal reality is that there is little opportunity for a rewarding working life in many such communities, and without huge, seismic change there never will be, either for the Indigenous people who live in them or for the outside doctors, nurses, teachers and tradies we must recruit to help and train them.

Has the well-intentioned generosity of welfare been misguided, and perversely alienated those it was meant to benefit?

Or, worse, has it been misdirected through incompetence or malfeasance? To my mind the only useful by-product of this ruinous exercise is that it has concentrated the public’s mind on these questions, and on the tragic condition of much of remote Aboriginal Australia.

It has highlighted the expenditure of billions of dollars annually, and the inability of hundreds of agencies, across decades, to administer welfare funds in an efficient or transparent manner.

Some of the figures quoted are selectively calculated and deliber­ately exaggerated, but there’s little doubt that a great deal of money is not making it to where it’s needed. If this failure can be audited and corrected, then the distress the debate has caused might be justified.

It would be a Herculean challenge to sweep away the waste that pollutes the gigantic bureaucratic apparatus, which prompts another question: if its thousands of staff are deaf now to the voices crying for help, how would giving them permanent constitutional job security be an incentive to lift their game?

But if sorting out the Aboriginal aid industry is hard, it’s a breeze compared with fixing what’s going wrong in the distant, benighted townships and closed communities. That will require desperately tough decisions to be taken and implemented; nothing will improve until we abandon the misty-eyed view of what’s desirable or achievable, target the most egregious areas of dysfunction and, above all, stop condemning commonsense measures as cultural heresies.

Even the opposition Indigenous Australians spokeswoman, intimately acquainted with this topic, has paid the price for speaking out, vilified as a glove puppet operated by racist white men. Hard to conceive of a more despicable insult to an Indigenous woman, but it’s an exemplar of the condescension and arrogance of those who be-Chicken-Little the dissenters. And while it’s one thing for impassioned campaigners to let emotion get the better of them, to hear our Prime Minister mock half the nation was beyond disgraceful. You’ll be governing for all Australians, will you?

As a grateful migrant to a wonderful country, in the 30 years since I swore my oath of allegiance to Australia I’ve often been amused by the expected (almost always good-natured) teasing about my British origins.

What I wasn’t prepared for was to be newly reclassified by some as an unwelcome visitor, a trespasser in this nation – shades of the ugly “We grew here, you flew here” slogan of the Cronulla rioters nearly 20 years ago. And never did I dream that the primacy of ancestry would diminish my Australian-born children’s status here.

Amazing as this may sound, it’s disappointing to be told you’re stupid, unreasonable, immoral, ignorant and racist by people who demand respect but give none in return. The fact is, all the polling indicates a respectful form of constitutional recognition was acceptable to the vast majority of Australians, but that was expressly dismissed as inadequate by every group that met to contribute to the Uluru Statement from the Heart’s terms.

I have ploughed through the 112 pages of background papers and the statements of record of the regional dialogues; and while they don’t make it into the not-much-to-see-here single-page summary, the quest for treaties and sovereignty, the required acknowledgment of genocide, the calls for financial reparations, leap from every page. Anyone who reads those documents and doesn’t feel uncomfortable is a more trusting soul than I am.

The activists are of course entitled to ask for whatever they think they deserve, but in some cases their generous invitation to walk together into a brighter future is couched in language better suited to vengeance; meanwhile it’s difficult not to fancy that a few of the outstretched hands of friendship seem to be reaching for our wallets. And if they’ve been working on the voice for many years, as we’re told, they were blind to how their demands might be perceived or indifferent to ordinary sensibilities throughout their deliberations.

Either way, the length of the process is of negligible significance: there are countless people who have devoted their lives to writing third-rate novels and other vanity projects that don’t bear critical scrutiny. The amendment was carelessly planned and pursued, despite the reaction to it being not just predictable but widely predicted.

I’m sad the architects of the voice were misled by our leaders, who assured them, behind closed doors, it was a done deal (standard operating procedure in Australian politics, unfortunately). No wonder they’re frustrated now the Yes vote looks like failing: they won’t be able to participate in the scrupulously fair allocation of seats on the voice’s gravy train as it steams off to Canberra. Anyone taking bets we could have named the first half-dozen ticketholders in the dining car?

But enough; let’s end with a word of consolation to the image-conscious citizens who are terrified that if the voice is voted down we’ll be perceived as rabid rednecks by every other country on earth, whose own human-rights records are miraculously spotless.

Sorry, globetrotters, we’re not on the world stage, much less in the spotlight; we’re barely in the audience. Of all the possible consequences of a No result, that should be the least of your concerns. Truth be told, I’m more worried that I’ll be identified and run over by one of my teal neighbours sneaking up behind me in their silent, Chinese toddler-built battery car.

That would probably be the end I deserve, and perhaps not entirely unwelcome, even to me. I’ve often wondered if one of the reasons some old people give up the ghost is that they’ve had enough of all life’s nonsense, ground down by the crushing weight of human stupidity.

Lord knows, there’s no shortage of that these days.

You could even threaten to demolish Al Aqsa and they would not see reason.

Too many generations of faux “palestinians” have been coddled and brainwashed by their fellow Arabs for political gain against Israel for them to be redeemed. The evil is too deeply rooted in their souls for reason to penetrate.

Which is why they need to be crushed with extreme prejudice, the remnants sent back to Jordan from whence they came, and a hard-line border policy imposed to prevent their return.

In the meantime, I’m afraid the hard truth is that the likelihood of any hostages coming home alive is minimal. An object lesson of why borders are so important and must be defended.

Firstly my thoughts are with Israel and the Jewish people around the world.

Listened to first 20 minutes of Spencer Howson 4BC show today. He started off with a round up of the news. Mentioned about 12 stories from Qld and around the country. Clearly going off the newspapers. No mention of Israel at all. Even if not in papers could have at least mentioned it briefly.

The shocking thing is how well planned it has been. How does a top Israeli General even get captured? Then there are the multiple hostage takings.

Obviously the IDF and politicians would have wargamed what to do in event of multiple hostage taking back into enemy territory. Problem is they are going to be held in multiple locations and there is so much going on that it will be hard to focus on rescue even if know where some are.

The Israelis are well known for their efforts in recovering their people and this is one of the aspects I admire about them. However unfortunately the hostage aspect is going to drag on for years and some have probably already been taken to other “friendly” countries. We know which country would like to talk to the General.

Another trait I admire about the Israelis / Jews is their ability in relation to retribution. As hostages are mistreated or killed this will be more severe and I will be hoping those who planned and took part in the attacks get their just reward.

In terms of leadership Netanyahu is going to have to make some very tough decisions which are going to cost lives. Hopefully more theirs than his own people. Unfortunately the enemy does not respect the lives of their own people as much as Netanyahu and his military does.

I hope Israel can get through this and wish it’s people peace and a safe existence again in the not too distant future.

Celebrations in Justin Trudeau’s Toronto:

https://twitter.com/ezralevant/status/1710799487604531605

Oh dear.

Former ambassador Dave Sharma outlines ‘very complicated’ Israel response following massive attack by Hamas militants (Sky News, 8 Oct)

No Mr Sharma it is not complicated at all. Leave no stone upon another.

Why does Sky News pander to this guy? Sheesh, just go away.

I’d suggest the IDF go into Gaza and grab as many community leaders as they can find.
The terrorists can only survive if civic and local political leaders support them. Remove the administration.

Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong has come under fire after she called for Israel to act with “restraint” in the face of an unprecedented attack by Palestinian militant group Hamas.

“Restraint” is the last thing that is needed or should be called for, against these scum.

Contrast the attitude of “progressives” like Wong’s on Ukraine vis-à-vis Israel; the former is allowed any means to defend itself, Israel virtually none at all.

Mention was made of a sports star at a polling station by Piers Akerman.

Last night saw a Tweet in relation to Adam Goodes at a polling station that fits Piers article. Did not register where it was.

Did anybody notice the PM at Lakemba mosque on Friday gathering support for the voice? Seems the word went out to all mosques to mention supporting the Voice during Friday prayers. There has been a concerted effort by the Yes campaign to elicit Muslim leader support with Noel from Noosa doing the same in Qld.

A week earlier PM had posed with religious leaders who were supporting the Voice. Add it to the list of “whatever it takes” by desperate Albo.

Been rereading the George Smiley series. In Smiley’s People, Connie Sachs, the Russia watcher, has a dog called Trot. I immediately thought of Luigi the Unbelievable. Thing is Luigi is much further down the food tree than a dog.

Turn off the services to Gaza, remove any Pali’s in Israel to Gaza, destroy Gaza infrastructure and no services returned until the Pali’s give up Hamas. Any rockets fired into israel from Gaza send two back. Eff Em.

Paraphrase of Sharma:

with former ambassador Dave Sharma explaining the presence of hostages will complicate the nation’s efforts to fight back.

Bruce of Newcastle
Oct 8, 2023 11:37 AM

No Mr Sharma it is not complicated at all. Leave no stone upon another.

BoN back-peddling:

No Colonel I don’t want to kill hostages.

How did BoN ever think saving hostages would present no complication at all to levelling the entire occupied area?

Hamas and Israel are both one step ahead of BoN.

The State Department also furiously deleting and denying tweets.

Breitbart has an excellent ongoing timeline of news and information.

BoN back-peddling

Colonel, totally insulting evil garbage. You should know better than to say that. It is a window into your psyche that is very revealing. If you have read what I have written about the Pali-Israeli conflict for the last 15 years on this and Sinc’s Cat you would realize how disgusting your comment is. Go jump in a long drop toilet son, where you deserve to be, you are nasty and revolting.

UNRWA can feed ’em.

Nah. Let the Arab League feed them. They’ve kept this dangerous fiasco alive for over 75 years, they can clean up their own mess.

“We will ensure that an appropriate policing plan is in place in order to balance the right to protest against any disruption to Londoners,” the adds.”

The same British police who allow hateful anti-Israel protest marches following multiple terrorist attacks, will arrest you merely for alleged thought crimes against wokedom.

I

ML – Yes, Tacitus was very caustic about Mr Tiberius Caesar. Biden is actually worse.

Zatara
Oct 8, 2023 12:51 PM
UNRWA can feed ’em.

Nah. Let the Arab League feed them. They’ve kept this dangerous fiasco alive for over 75 years, they can clean up their own mess.

I wonder what proportion of the UNWRA dosh goes to the support, paying, accommodation and arming of Pali “militants”?

Further to Pogria, Oct 8, 2023 12:35 PM
An older tweet from Adam Kredo is also looking like a harbinger (with hindsight).
@Kredo0 · Jan 21, 2021

Biden Admin Changes U.S. Ambassador to Israel into “U.S. Ambassador to Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza” — Day 1 policy shift signals new admin does not consider any parts of these areas as Israeli territory

That may have explained the initial “stand down” tweet.
It put the US apparently in a position of being more clearly against Iran and other supporters of Hamas than being with Israel.

The usefulness of Yet Another Foreign War as distraction for USA politics cannot be overestimated. Hence recent chatter being all about broadening the discussion to Iran, rather than some limited support focused on Hamas.

Trudeau’s Toronto…where creatures openly celebrate murder and abduction of families openly in the streets.

This is where the Cult of “Nice” gets you.

The degradation of Canada is almost complete.

Sydney this morning at 10:30 (both clips prompted) –

St Mary’s Cathedral

St Andrew’s Cathedral

Well the good wife and myself have arrived in Dubai after a 14 hour flight from Melbourne (it’s 6.30am here in Dubai). Flew with Emirates, outstanding service on such a long flight.

We both managed to get 4-5 hours half decent sleep.

We have 4 hours in Dubai before we catch our next flight to London – just 7 hours this time.

“Diogenes
Oct 8, 2023 12:47 PM
Wonder how much of the weaponry left behind in Afghanistan is being used by Hamas.”

Diogenes,
I saw an article earlier today describing exactly that. It also had pix. I can’t remember where I saw it, perhaps Ace of Spades. No time to look now. Worth a try.

P
Oct 8, 2023 1:33 PM

Sydney this morning at 10:30 (both clips prompted) –
St Mary’s Cathedral
St Andrew’s Cathedral

Sorry P, I’m not religious in the least, don’t belong to any denominations, so I have no idea what you are trying to say here.

Can you expand?