In a recent article in the Australia, Greg Sheridan wrote “How China and its allies are winning the new cold war”. To slightly paraphrase one section, Sheridan wrote: “Beijing is taking every step to equip itself to fight a major war against the US. All the authoritarian (nations) have built, or are building, wartime economies. Almost all the democracies are half asleep. And it shows.”
Sheridan is largely correct. Most Western nations have either ignored, or simply don’t understand, China’s economic and military strategies. As an aside, we can also draw unmistakable parallels with Western disregard or ignorance of Russia’s ‘redlines’ regarding Ukraine and NATO – although the stakes are a lot higher when it comes to China.
Over the past 10-15 years, in particular, we (the West) have ignored or been too timid to counter China’s excesses, such as building islands in the South China Sea, because we wanted a continuing stream of cheap goods. We achieved that goal but missed the big picture although the Chinese haven’t been hiding their intentions.
Since President Xi came to power in 2012, the West seems to have misunderstood Xi’s oft stated words that China’s goal is “the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation”. That isn’t some hollow patriotic slogan – he means it. And the goal is to be achieved by 2049 being the 100 year anniversary of the PRC.
And just to be sure the point got through, back on October 1st 2019, President Xi said in a speech marking the 70th anniversary of the PRC that: “Today a socialist China is standing in the east of the world and there is no force that can shake the foundation of this great nation.” He went on to say that reunification of China with Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan was only partially achieved.
To achieve this unification and firmly establish China as the pre-eminent world power, China must continue to expand its base by forging partnerships that may disrupt or destabilise pre-existing localised alliances and undermine the international order.
One example of this was the ‘One Belt, One Road’ initiative which serves as a backbone to influence. Effectively, all projects are financed by the EXIM Bank of China with a loan ratio of 85% Chinese loan and 15% local government input. We know what often follows later is delayed debt payments resulting in transferral of local equity giving EXIM Bank (ie. CCP) control.
Alternatively, we have seen more direct actions some of which were characterised as ‘wolf-warrior’ diplomacy. China subsequently backed away from that approach only to replace it with new development loans or outright gifts such as roads, buildings and other infrastructure. Not in the Pacific, Africa and other places did this happen because China had a sudden rush of benevolence.
The point of these loans and other largesse is that Xi recognises that China’s plans to unification by 2049 cannot be achieved peacefully as core aspects of the prevailing international system are incompatible with its strategy. And, because the US is their main international competitor, China sees all US security alliances and partnerships, especially those in the Indo-Pacific region, as destabilising and irreconcilable with China’s sovereignty, security, and developmental interests. Thus, China’s efforts to foster widespread influence has a longer term goal of cultivating, and then choreographing, their community of allies.
This first stage of destabilising Western hegemony, and for China to meet its goals to become a “great modern socialist country”, is the applying of influence. Similar to Donald Trump recognised the ‘fly-over’ States as being ripe for the picking and consequent winning of the Presidential election in 2016, China has recognised that the West has largely ignored many nations whose ideology or geographical location is not deemed important enough. These must be cultivated as friends of China.
Other nations, including Australia, are subject to a periodic charm offensive from a Chinese delegation and we dutifully fall in line. Nothing too controversial is raised. We dare not raise the ire of China lest we suffer trade restrictions.
The second stage is for China to cement national rejuvenation and international status. Xi describes this as China being “the global leader in terms of composite national strength and international influence.” Couple this with a (planned) dominant world-class military and Xi’s words about China’s ascension to the top of the international order, and that China will establish a “community with a shared future for mankind”, should resonate within us.
Of course, there are some recalcitrants. Not everyone welcomes China’s vision of their global supremacy.
Skirmishes have happened and will continue to happen in the South China Sea and we can expect to witness far more Chinese naval activity in the Straits of Malacca, Celebes Sea and Sunda Strait. The recent naval interaction in the South China Sea between forces of the PRC and the Philippine navy is just another taste of the future. Pushing and prodding, the Chinese navy and Coast Guard will exert territorial pressure against other nations – many of whom have treaties with the USA – but the US won’t intervene at this low scale, and the Chinese know it.
On all the available data, it seems that it is only a matter of time before the military forces of the PRC sufficiently exceed those of the USA that China will feel able to fulfill her destiny. The Americans currently have a decisive military advantage in some elements (ie. aircraft carriers; helicopters, aerial refuelling) but how long will that advantage last? China is known to have four aircraft carriers at various stages of construction plus a litany of other military hardware. In any event, would the USA really go to war over Taiwan if China had six aircraft carrier groups loitering in the region? Hypothetical of course and time will tell, but there can be no doubting China’s rapidly expanding military strength.
If we ask ourselves who, other than the USA, could come to Taiwan’s rescue, there is no answer. No other nation, or even collection of nations, has the necessary capability without in-depth American involvement. Yet even with American involvement, Taiwan is incredibly vulnerable with a billion citizens fuelled with determined resolve to unite China once and for all, just 160km off the Taiwanese coast.
In any case, China is convinced that the assorted treaties between Taiwan and other nations will prove worthless in the face of Chinese militarily supremacy.
Meanwhile, China and Russia have drawn ever closer as Russia supplies China with inexhaustible quantities of raw materials and their world views coincide. Both see a new era of the East rising from the ruins of the failing West. Announcements such as the Russia/China ‘no limits’ declaration don’t happen by accident – it was a deliberate assertion of their view of the global future. To that end, China will endure Western barbs for not imposing sanctions on Russia over Ukraine as China has her eyes on the far larger objectives of global dominance and unification.
Which brings us to another aspect of Chinese preparations. It is well documented that the Chinese Central Bank has been adding to its gold reserves. In the past eighteen months it has purchased more gold than it had done in the previous fifty years. Further, in the past year or more, it has also been using its foreign currency reserves to buy gold instead of renminbi as they did previously. This means the Bank is reducing its stockpile of, and dependence on, the U.S. dollar. In a similar vein, China has been reducing its U.S. Treasury holdings. Those holdings have reduced from $1.1 trillion to $775 billion in a little over three years.
If all this sounds familiar, you’re right. Russia made similar moves (buying gold, selling down their foreign currency reserves) from 2012 to 2022 as well as the creation of the trading platform that mimics SWIFT (known as SPFS) for trade between countries.
Now of course, BRICS+ nations have moved to using their domestic currencies for trade between each other via SPFS – all of which will further shield China from dependence on the American dollar. Taken in isolation, these actions could be dismissed but given China’s stated goal, appear to be the start of a long road towards de-coupling, or insulation, from Western economic retaliation.
The point is that China is patiently making preparations for reuniting with Taiwan, by force if necessary. These preparations will take time as the Chinese military is not (yet) sufficiently formidable to fully dissuade the USA from military action. However, when the time comes, we can be sure that China will ensure she is militarily and economically insulated from Western reprisal.
Despite all the handwringing, we have done this to ourselves. For example, we had a chance to act as China built artificial islands around the aptly named Mischief Reef. No serious person believed China wouldn’t militarise those islands but the West was too intimidated and lacked collective resolve to invoke sanctions, much less a military response.
There are numerable quotes from President Xi about reunification with Taiwan, but I will leave you with this one. Speaking at an event marking the 110th anniversary of the revolution that overthrew China’s last imperial dynasty in 1911, he said he said unification in a “peaceful manner” was “most in line with the overall interest of the Chinese nation, including Taiwan compatriots.” So far so good, but then he went on to say “No one should underestimate the Chinese people’s staunch determination, firm will, and strong ability to defend national sovereignty and territorial integrity. The historical task of the complete reunification of the Motherland must be fulfilled, and will definitely be fulfilled,”
Xi is resolute and the West is very unlikely to have the capacity or will to withstand China. We should expect that Chinese school children will be singing songs about Xi as the great leader who united China and ushered in the bright dawning of the East. Listen for them on your radio – they will be played at the top of each hour before the news.
Correct me if I’m wrong but hasn’t Putin cosied up to China coz of the US and Nato pushing the boundaries in Ukeland. No thought given that Russia would seek others to trade with. The US complaining that Ukeland had a puppet government controlled by Russia bad, but one controlled by us good. I don’t think china can decouple from the west. Spreading risk is all any country can do except for Ausfailure who’ll consistently put all their eggs in one basket. Taiwan has never been part of China except through incursion. Does this mean if a country invades China it is no longer Chinese. Might is right unless against china.
China is now the largest foreign investor in Hungary and that investment has clearly come with some unsavoury political strings attached, such as not criticising China’s human rights abuses. A blot on Orban’s escutcheon.
All of China’s neighbours hate them because of obnoxious Chinese behaviour.
India recently cosied up to Taiwan, which shows just how badly Chinese diplomacy is going. Claiming a whole bunch of Indian territory doesn’t help. I suspect India has worked out from the Russo-Ukraine War and the Houthis in Yemen that an invasion of Taiwan is going to be an utter disaster for China. Ukraine is flat, yet has held the Russian Army to a standstill with massive casualties. Taiwan is mountainous. China could lose literally millions of PLA guys trying and failing to take the place. Defense has the upperhand on the current battlefield, hence the Houthis in their mountains thumbing their noses at just about everyone.
The other aspect is that Chinese obnoxious behaviour is causing decoupling, which is having a significant effect on Chinese employment numbers. Youth unemployment is serious, and that is feeding in to the laying flat syndrome and the population implosion. Beijing keeps on trying to encourage women to have babies, but are failing miserably – if there are no jobs for the men the women aren’t going to have families with them. Same in the West of course.
It’ll be interesting though since Xi is in a wicked use it or lose it equation. It won’t be many years before the aging Chinese demographics make sustaining military power infeasible. But if he uses it the results could, and probably will be catastrophic for his country – again because defense is the lord of battle at the moment.
Bruce, from day one, although no one in the west appears to pay any attention, Russia has repeatedly stated that (from their point of view), this is a “war of attrition”.
Putin said this on 25th Feb 2022 and Surovikin said it, in Sept of 2022.
As you are well aware, casualties mount far quicker during attack, than during defence.
The ineptitude and callousness of the Generals running the war from Ukraine, has played right into the Russians hands.
Of course, it is highly probable, that the “real” decisions on the battlefield were being made from Washington, by imbeciles like Vicky “biscuits” Nuland, Jake “the Middle East has never been quieter” Sullivan and “thoroughly modern Millie”, who clearly couldn’t give a flying f$#k about the Ukrainian people, so long as, (in their eyes at least), they are doing damage to Russia.
Vietnam, Afghanistan and now Ukraine.
Who’s next for US assistance, ok Taiwan, you are it!
FIFY.
News today is that both Moldova and Ukraine have now entered negotiations to join the EU. This after Sweden and Finland joined NATO. Poland today has announced they are expanding their army by another 10,000.
Russia is going really really well…
if you think Russia is losing this war, i have a bridge in Sydney..etc
I have said it before, I’ll say it again.
China and her stooges push simultaneously two completely mutually exclusive narratives.
Various individuals at various times will buy into either of these stories because the actual reality is grim: we’re in the sh*t and the only way out is hard work over a long time including high prices, long hours and an end to the easy times of recent memory.
But try to say any of that and people start screaming at you.
Austerity is a dirty word.
Keep up the Good Fight, Arky! Few others will.
we’re in the sh*t and the only way out is hard work over a long time including high prices, long hours and an end to the easy times of recent memory.
The West has gone soft and stupid. The only question is, are we going to recover our mojo or go under.
I reckon the US being ruled by unelected people in their Intello groups have lost sight of what’s good for the USA versus what’s good for them personally and their mates
The Intello groups power has been growing for decades and they can easily make or break presidents or any other role, if they feel like it.
Having complete power over other countries and millions of lives, builds hubris.
Now they have no clue how to dial it back, and have no qualms about having idiot Biden in the President’s role, their arrogance is so great.
What direction from here?
There are two kinds of animal: those tuned for abundance and those tuned for scarcity.
Watching men once again blown apart by high explosives on European battlefields, amongst the wreckage of towns and cities whose inhabitants have either fled or died; with losses mounting and attitudes hardening, we are in for some volatile times ahead.
It is mind numbing, is it not? My God, maybe we are too attuned to Netflix and movies, that we watch the carnage on TV, and are seemingly unmoved to analyse what is going on “over there”.
And it requires analysis. As we can see on this very blog – there are different opinions – dare I say too aligned to ideology rather than the events.
There is no coexisting with this evil communist regime
yes, thank goodness we don’t do business with them!
China has a huge population that she thinks is her strength. It is not – it is her weakness.
Like a wrestler in a Jujitsu match, her size and weight can be used against her. One poor crop result followed by a drought and she is gone. No one can suppress 1.4 Billion empty bellies.
The communists know this, and we should be very wary of what she would do in extremis.
Bob, they had empty bellies and died in the fields during the Cultural Revolution. I have read accounts of eye witnesses now in their 70s plus who recall it all – the forced transportation to barren fields and hostile villages. But that did not incite a rebellion.
There wasn’t as many then, and the ones now living are getting jack of the Party – the ‘lying flat’ and empty wombs are indicative.
Mass starvation was more a feature of the countryside as you infer, but when the cities start to starve that’s a different story.
Todays China and the Cultural Revolutions China are different beasts.
Speedbox, this is a tour de force in analysis of a pressing problem for Australia – but one which many Australians are pretending that they cannot see.
Prior to Jim Molan’s untimely death, he wrote a short but focussed analysis of the “real and present” danger that China and the CCP poses for us “(“Danger on our Doorstep”). It seemed to me to receive little of the attention that it deserved. Indeed, we seem so uniformly blind to the Chinese threat that even the superb analyses of the Left’s own political warriors – such as Clive Hamilton(“Hidden Hand”) and Peter Hartcsher (“Red Zone”) seemed to have any effect in raising the alarm in this sleepy hollow of a country.
Well done, Speedbox!
With (according to a quick google) 1.4 million ethnic Chinese in Australia, it wouldn’t take a huge proportion to bring the country to a standstill.
Big Australia has screwed us good and propper.
There is no coexisting with this evil communist regime. Xi is a malevolent dastardly individual who has his eyes fixed firmly on a united China.
But again, this isn’t about China de-coupling from the West. China can’t de-couple and she knows it. This is about imposing her will and suffering the least economic retaliation. The actions I outlined in the post are all about her actions to insulate herself.
When push finally comes to shove the West will protest and call assorted Chinese Ambassadors in and complain about potential loss of life; limited motions will be passed in the UN but remember that some 181 nations recognise China’s sovereignty over Taiwan (only 12 don’t); the Security Council won’t act; there will be heated protests against China on the streets of Paris, Bonn and Sydney…..
In other words, there will be lots of ‘outrage’ at the loss of life and calls for China to exercise restraint, but that’s all. A few nations may propose (or will impose) sanctions but none will cause China to flinch and of course, there is always the risk of retaliatory sanctions. How far will Australia push with China being our biggest trading partner?
Meanwhile, her (new) colossal navy quarantines Taiwan and her Air Force controls the sky. Paratroopers fall like confetti while half a million troops cross the narrow strait and after a few days of bitter fighting, are backed up by more. Martial law, media blackout, Taiwan partially excised from the global internet….
Then, after a few weeks, it’s all over. China will never divulge her military losses but they died ‘for the divine glory of a united Motherland’. Civilian losses will be large, but the number never confirmed.
And the world settles into the new status quo. Any sanctions imposed against China are quietly wound back with the explanation that, well, Taiwan was always part of China and our concern was just that casualties be minimised. From that point forward, who knows.
I have thought about this scenario a lot in the last few years. Your scenario seems not only plausible, but likely.
Importantly, where does that leave us? Up the creek without a paddle, as they say. I forsee a quiet capitulation to all trade terms and otherwise that the new Lord of the South Seas decrees. We then become a sort of “vassal state”, subject to the rules of the CCP. We know all about that situation from the great empires of history.
And what wild factor may intervene? Well, in my wildest dreams I imagine those nuke subs of the USA patrolling those waters that China wants to dominate. Some tell me that they are around us now from time to time, patrolling the neighbourhood.
But how long will they remain if, as is reported, Putin is sending nuclear armed subs and warships to Cuba?
The current US regime may be having its hand revealed. Putin and Xi are good poker players.
Yes, but I don’t think there a billion Chinese passionately invested in Xi’s vision. The clique in charge seem impregnable, until they aren’t. That said, Xi will be desperate to achieve his vision in his lifetime, which is where the real danger is, along with the corrupted polity in the US.
This.
Exactly right.
“Taiwan has never been part of China except through incursion.”
According to the US State Dept, as well as the UN, that statement is incorrect.
https://www.state.gov/countries-areas/taiwan/
“The U.S. and Taiwan enjoy a robust unofficial relationship. The 1979 U.S.-P.R.C. Joint Communique switched diplomatic recognition from Taipei to Beijing. In the Joint Communique, the U.S. recognized the Government of the People’s Republic of China as the sole legal government of China, acknowledging the Chinese position that there is but one China and Taiwan is part of China.”
UN Resolution 2758:
“The General Assembly, ……
Decides to restore all its rights to the People’s Republic of China and to recognize the representatives of its Govt as the only legitimate representatives of China to the United Nations, and to expel forthwith the representatives of Chiang Kai-shek from the place which they unlawfully occupy at the United Nations and in all the organisations related to it.”
1976th plenary meeting
25 October 1971.
For those who may not be aware, Chiang Kai-shek was the leader of the breakaway “Republic of China”, (ROC), from Taiwan.
China’s big problem is the Little Emperor’s, sole children of parents who are themselves sole children.
Chinese culture is very family oriented. Losing a Little Emperor means the end of at least four family lines. Losing many thousands of them will have a severe ripple effect, not necessarily in Emperor Xi’s favour.
Is the problem Chinese unification or the means the PRC might use to unify China? If its the former we have a problem because its perfectly reasonable to want to reunify a country that was previously in the middle of a civil war. Had a rump survived the American Civil War it would have remained an abiding aim of North to reunify. Less so of the CSA but in time might have become a policy under certain contingencies.
If it’s the latter, than try and engineer a circumstance in which more peaceful means are seen as the best means of reunification, or at the very least, give the pretense of unification some time in the future.
Sure, why not? Add apologising for China to apologising for Russia. Tis but a small step.
This really is exciting, seeing just how far your new found anti- Western sentiments will take you.
Surely, eventually you will decide that abortion is good, because it means less of those evil Westerners.
Who knows how far you’ll find yourself down this path in another year or two?
My sentiments aren’t ‘anti-Western’. I’m just not going to write a blank cheque and avoid criticizing a regime that is obviously wearing a Western skinsuit and bark at phantoms of its own imagination because it suits it.
Yes they are.
And getting worse by the day.
If you had long ago limited yourself to the legitimate question “Is supporting Ukraine in our interest”, that would be a fine debate. But you are an active Russian cheerleader.
No, they’re not. If you want to slavishly follow the US that is your pejorative, but I’m not going to be contained by endless appeals to ‘the West’ in order to quarantine the GAE of legitimate criticism. As for the second part, please. Setting aside the fact that people simply arguing against the prudence of the GAE’s Ukraine policy have been accused of Putinism, Kremlin apologists, and the like, I’m not going to restrict my criticisms of the GAE simply to whether this or that policy is prudent so as to never directly criticize this or that policy or the character of the regime itself because such criticism might be confused or conflated with being ‘anti-Western’.
What the hell is “GAE”?
Our cheques just don’t matter.
And although you are probably using “regime” in the particular negative sense, it is indeed a regime.
The West decided post WW2 to remake the world as a global system. It deliberately moved it’s own manufacturing out of our countries, into low labour cost, populous, non- Western countries, with the intention to Westernise the entire world.
The whole system, was designed to make it painful for any one part of it to go off on its own. Russia, China, India, the whole lot of them, wouldn’t be anything at all without the West making that decision and working for decades to bring it about. You think the Soviets would have invented iPhones? Mao’s China would have been able to clothe or feed the world?
I have always, always been a critic of Western de-industrialisation, and foreseen what the “former” communists would do once they had the industrial base to challenge that regime.
To fully appreciate the fix we are in, consider the basis for our economy: debt. We rely on demographic growth to create debt and keep the system going. But our native populations have stopped growing: are now declining. Along with that population decline comes cultural decay. Our elites suppose they have little choice but to continue to accelerate immigration in order to keep the show going. The system is also captured by trade policies. Covid showed the inflation and shortages we will face if limited to what we can produce in the West.
We have snookered ourselves.
I think many of the insane seeming policies are a result of these miscalculations. Would the green energy push be attractive to policy makers if they weren’t worried about competing with the newly industrialised world for fossil fuels? Would voters accept those policies if we still had the industries relying on cheap energy?
Many contradictions are about to become clear to all.
The forces are huge, the system incomprehensible, the constraints make the scope of possible actions small.
Some contradictions about to become fully clear:
It’s not an analysis I strongly disagree with, but the rub for me is that these policies, even if you accept it on its face, has been disastrous, domestically, and internationally, although trade has lifted many of them up, there are also elements of that international system that have diminished others as well as imposed penalties on any nation that wished to act in any way independently of the US. It seems to me entirely reasonable for nations like Russia or China (even the Europeans) to slowly remove themselves from that system because it is designed to maintain the US as the international hegemon at any cost to themselves.
..
They aren’t after removing themselves from the system.
They’re after what they have always been after, which is the defeat and replacement of that system with international communism.
A global system of police states from which there is no escape, eternal surveillance and for those out of favour: Orwells boot to the face forever and ever. North Korea for everyone.
Now you might say, and reasonably so, that our Western leaders have learnt much from the communists and seem to want to impose their JV version of police state totalitarianism too.
But from where did they learn these things? Because while the West was trying to export Levi’s and Coca Cola and freedom, the exchange went both ways. They got market economics, we got… well you know what we got.
One significant issue not mentioned is China’s population projections. Thanks to its one child policy and increase affluence, birth rates are well below replacement levels and, by 2049, China’s population will have decreased by possibly 100 million people. Parents will therefore place a much higher value on the lives of their children and will more strongly oppose sending their children to war, a position quite different to 50 years ago when most families had 3 or more children. At the same time, the USA’s population is growing thanks to immigration and its immigrant population’s birth rates are much higher than the existing population. Opposition to war will therefore be weaker in the US than in China, so the USA is in my view more likely to stand up to China and protect Taiwan over coming decades rather than stand back when China invades Taiwan.
We are seeing in Ukraine that it is men aged 30+ who are being thrown into the meat grinder.
China has more men aged 30 to 45 than the US has males altogether.
The other clear pattern we see in Ukraine is that it isn’t the ruling class’s ethnicity that is being consumed in war, it’s the people on the out.
Is that at least in part because the younger ones got out early?
I think many have.
Speedbox:
You mentioned the Taiwanese casualty rate. The Taiwanese casualty rate will be 100% of the population. If they don’t die in the war, they’ll be shipped off to the Chinese slave camps apart from the necessary ones to run the chip factories and essential infrastructure until new ‘reliable’ Chinese techs can be trained.
No one gets to thumb their nose at Xi without retribution.
The exodus from Vietnam will be nothing like what will happen if the Chinese overrun Taiwan, and the Taiwanese know it.
You can bet they have nukes and will use them – they have no other option.
I’d argue the glitter of riches goes back past recent time. It goes decades and even acknowledged by James Kynge China shakes The World, Western Companies knew they were losing IP to the Chinese, they knew they were at the whim of the Chinese political system but the profit to risk ratio was absolutely enormous. People were getting rich off China’s rise so threw caution to the wind, some made a killing, some walked away tail between legs licking wounds.
I personally know of a consultancy in Australia dealing with the mining game that folded after a AUD2mil bill was left unpaid by Chinese who took the data invoiced but didn’t think it was good enough so didn’t pay. They had no footprint in Australia so the civil action was moot point bit like Ch10/Paramount is going to find out soon. Another but slightly different is the defunct Major Drilling probably 20yo did a drilling project in China shipped in 4 UDR drilling rigs, newish. Once the project was done the drill rigs were just taken off the port they were meant to depart from by the CCP with no reason other than they are ours now. The books I have read highlight this behaviour is the norm for China.
Will Hutton writes some food for thought as well then there’s a Professor whose name and book escapes me & I can’t find it on my bookshelf who was very good about Chinese psyche that was very informative for my perspective. There is some good authors and books around but I have only found in Asian Airport book stores unfortunately. LOL I did get sucked in once by Gordon Chang once but after researching him, he is like Harry Dent and the next Depression just round the corner…
As for those Islands in SC sea. Militarily the first strike would render them useless for air projection, probably knock out the radars as well. They are there as a statement of claim, I believe there is a clause within UNCLOS or it may even go back further to the colonial era/medieval conventions that if an area is uncontested but settled by a claimant after 20 years they have claim to that area. The Phillo’s on Thomas Shoal is quite bothersome to Beijing. That is what these islands are for, every time the US or NAT/US Pacific partner sails a ship in a “right of passage” it disrupts that claim. Hence the screeching and pure aggression when it is done.
As for Chinese military. Big and formidable yes but I think I stated as an observation the other day that they haven’t fought a war since Korea at peer level unless you include Vietnam in 1979. The start of any conflict is going to be horrendous casualty wise, Xi better have the nationalist rhetoric dialled up to 11 when the body bags come home. I also think US, Japan, South Korea wouldn’t let an invasion of Taiwan go uncontested, that would bring in us, possibly some European powers as well.
In conclusion I’d say you are smack on with the west don’t understand China or even their psyche being the centre of the world and possibly a reversion to Sinocentrism as apart from the Westphalian system we are used to. This could turn out to be the new world order if they prevail. However IMO having to do some transactions after spending 2 years of my life in the developing countries of Asia there is very much a my way or the highway when it comes to ethnic European foreigners.
Again as usual my 2c worth for what it is worth.