I have it on good authority that in Victoria (at least), the government is very seriously CONSIDERING introducing a ‘No Jab, No School’ policy for kids down to 12 years old.
Yes, yes, I know, we’ve heard all this before. Not from this source, I haven’t. In my opinion, it does now represent a real threat.
Please note that I emphasised the word ‘considering’, so please, no recriminations if it doesn’t eventuate.
No matter. The very suggestion of it, from those who are armed to force it on the most vulnerable, should send shivers down every thinking adult’s spine. These kids are not in a position to enquire, to research, to give informed consent. We as parents are entrusted to do this on their behalf. But no, what is being suggested is effectively taking that out of our hands.
And for what?
As you can see from this graph, throughout the entire 18 months of this ‘pandemic’ only a single person below the age of 19 has died with/of COVID-19.
In fact only 14 people below the age of 50 have died from the nearly 50,000 cases we’ve experienced. Why even come for the under 50’s, let alone the children?
What’s more telling, is the loss of perspective in all this. In 2017 alone (yes, just that single 12 month block), 21 people under 44 years old died from the standard Flu. Covid has been prowling for more than 17 months, and has managed less than 14.
In 2019 (the year before this rock show started), 16 kids between the ages of 1-14 years old died of Influenza and pneumonia. Compare this with a single death in nearly 18 months, and did they enforce a ‘No Jab, No School’ policy effectively removing parental rights and responsibilities? No, of course not. We live with ‘the Flu’.
I don’t care how docile, malleable, non-confrontational you may be as parents, grandparents, or even great grandparents, there comes a time when Mama and Papa Bear need to bare their claws in defence of the Cubs.
Whether people want to admit it or not, we really don’t know the long term effects of these vaccines, especially on children. The constant moving of age restrictions, etc, is evidence of the ‘suck-it-and-see’ approach behind their introduction. We seem on the verge of jumping clean over the atrocity of forcing adults to expose themselves to it, in order to work, and are now approaching the twilight zone in which kids are threatened with the removal of what was, only 18 months ago, considered a Human Right.
I’d be extremely disappointed if this prospect didn’t raise the hackles of even the most stringent adherent of the Church of Dan (though nothing would surprise me nowadays). However, I can promise them, try forcing this on their kids, and there’ll be a great many fathers (and I hope mothers) going straight to punching stations in defence of their children’s rights and futures (NADT).
P.S. As an aside, I’m getting a wee bit tired of being constantly threatened with the removal of services that I am currently forced to pay for.