This is my kind of article: Novavax: the good vaccine. It’s not that most of us are in any sense “anti-vaxxers” but lots of us are very reluctant to take any of the currently existing experimental forms now on offer. But there is Novavax which many of us have been looking out for. Who can be sure of any of it, but here we find it discussed in a very positive way. But first, there is a discussion of Daniel Andrews in a way that makes me trust her judgement just that little bit more.
And the final straw?
He forces you to get a medical treatment that you never wanted.
In many ways, Victoria’s relationship with Daniel Andrews resembles more of an abusive relationship than a government that is in power to serve the people.
Victoria’s two-tiered society has witnessed the use of isolationist language and tactics to separate the vaccinated from the unvaccinated.
Dictator Dan pushes Victorians to consider the vaccinated as superior citizens and the unvaccinated as less than helots.
But then to Novavax. She writes:
The highly anticipated Novavax vaccine may act as a kind of saviour to those with health issues who cannot take other Covid-19 vaccines which are currently on the market. Also, those who just plain and simple do not feel confident in our current variety of vaccines….
Novavax is clearly standing out from the crowd. With the absence of the contentious mRNA technology from Pfizer and Moderna (which has been linked to myocarditis, pericarditis, potential pregnancy and neonatal adverse events, menstrual changes and in some very rare but serious cases, death) and Astra Zeneca’s reputation crushing blood clotting saga, Novavax’s safety is demonstrating a higher success rate.
In relation side effects, the decreased rate of adverse reactions is promising. In fact, this table from the New England Journal of Medicine looks at Novavax’s adverse reactions records in relation to a study. When looking at the toxicity grade (mild, moderate, severe or potentially life threatening) there is no data to suggest a potentially life threatening reaction in their study. This is incredible news in optimising the safety and confidence for Australians to get vaccinated.
Novavax also has an incredible 96% efficacy which has been seen in their first trial.
So far so good. So let’s get on with it.
45 thoughts on “Novavax the vaccine for the vaxxine-hesitant”
I’ll bet Pfizer et al will fight access to this tooth and nail. I won’t be holding my breath on its availability.
Great. Another vaccine to ward off a virus with a 99 percent survival rate.
Still not happy it uses the spike proteins. Everything I’ve read about covid indicates the problems stem from the spike protein. It’s a better option than crap that tells your body to produce it, but I’m pretty bloody unhappy to have to take something just to work. Especially seeing I’m not in any of the risk categories.
absolute risk reduction of three fifths of fuck all for any healthy person under the age of forty.
Yes, let’s all suddenly trust a staffer
Hmm, aren’t the spike proteins causing the clotting problems?
So it’s not a vaccine then.
It’s an advert. All the links are just junk. And why are you suddenly so trusting of anyone encouraging you to get vaxxed? You ought to be on high alert,FFS. You’ve lost the plot, Mr Kates.
Is the Flinders University vaccine from Prof Petrovsky similar to Novavax? Is ScoMo supporting our own product?
Whether or not you think covid is life threatening novavax is a way out of the vaccine passport fiasco for some Australians
to be approved in Europe within days
Petrovsky has received a million in funding but seems a way off submitting for approval in Australia
Is this a gene therapy type drug that gets your own body to produce the spike protein?
No. It has fragments of spike protein, which in themselves are not in a form which can do major damage, and there is no instruction to get your body to reproduce the spike.
Does this vax do any other tricks in your body?
It ‘tickles’ your immune system is some way to get it to respond to the parts of the spike that is injected
Hmm…this is negative. Anything that tries to do cute/tricky things in your body is going to get in the way of very complex natural processes, which is never good.
Are there any secret or strange ingredients in the shot?
Yes, it has nanoparticles and graphene oxide. It also has undisclosed/secret ingredients (like the others).
Why the f… do these companies do this? Why am I expected to be ok with heavy metals and unknown ingredients being injected directly into my body?
Who owns novavax?
Major institutional investors are: Wellington Management Co., T. Rowe Price Associates, Fidelity Management & Research, and Renaissance Technologies
Neutral on this. Vanguard, Blackrock, etc. may still be behind this group, but on the surface, can’t say if it’s a positive or negative.
The best option if you had to take something would be Covax-19. This is a traditional vaccine, using tradition processes and ingredients. It’s an Australian vaccine too. But this is being stalled through its approval process, wonder why….
Of course the most rational thing to do is allow people to make their own decisions about whether they want a vaccine or not, and if they do, choose which they prefer.
But we don’t live in rational times, something dark is going on in the world, and the virus is just a cover for something more sinister.
This is the critical point. Unless some dramatic turnaround occurs, vaccine passports etc will continue into the foreseeable future and there will be little option but to get the jab. So if there’s a potentially better option that the current crop of poison, then that is a good thing.
‘Hesitant’ is not applicable, this term was coined by the same university gronks that produced the blueprint for control and lockdowns governments all around the world have been using.
The Covax-19 from Dr Petrovski seems safer than Novavax and no involvement of Bill Gates. Not sure if it uses moths and bark like Novavax. That said, none of them are expected to actually work much at all, it’s about what is the least dangerous forced injection at this point. So currently the placebo saline shot continues to outperform.
Trigger content. Australia is up about 90% vax rates and so far no catastrophes with AZ or Pfiz. What’;s the big deal, or this just noice for the sake of noise?
Hahaha where have we heard that before? Lets not discuss what happened to the 4% and how the trials were conducted and the time frame etc.
Steve old boy, you are going to end your days a miserable wreck. You know that Victoria is finished. You know most Victorians will continue to vote for the nazis and that the opposition really isn’t. Wake up and leave that state man! No more whining – two words STOP IT! Now a third word LEAVE.
A quick look at the Prevent 19 study shows 63 out of 10,000 in the placebo group had symptoms of covid and a positive test, 14 out of 20,000 in the vaccine group.
All but two of the above, one from each group, are from “high risk” groups (over 65, under 65 with co-morbidities, etc).
If this trial shows anything, it is that only at risk groups should be offered the vaccines.
Absolute risk for the control group was about 0.031% and for the vaccine group 0.0035%.
Or to put it another way, your chances of not getting covid went up from 99.969% to 99.9965% if you got injected with spike protein.
Really, the Novavax study reads very much like the Pfizer study. All sweetness and light.
But there were more deaths in the vaccinated group than the control group with Pfizer.
As those on this blog may recall, I have been a great advocate of the conventional vaccine, Novavax, as a potential safe alternative to the current gene therapy products which have caused so many adverse reactions that, if they had have been marketed in earlier times, they would have been withdrawn from use.
However, caveats must be acknowledged. As far as I am aware, the safety conclusions in respect to Novavax are based solely on the clinical trials. The gene “vaccines” also were subject to clinical trails – but nothing beats “longevity” in trials – which is why drugs normally tested over very long periods.
I would also be happier if Novavax was manufactured by CSL, as is still possible (according to Greg Hunt), as there were production problems months ago in the USA which contaminated batches.
But, quite frankly, in our situation, I think my husband and I are better off pursuing our current supplement protocol and healthy diet regime. We have done our risk analysis, considering both our age, our relative isolation, our ability to resist mandates, and- of course – the statistics which show the very low risk in respect to this virus.
This path will not be for everybody. And certainly my “vaccine” choices would be Novavax and/or, if ever available, Petrovsky’s Covax19.
And I haven’t even mentioned Ivermectin. Havn’t been able to procure Stromectol tablets, but, by heck, I have a lot of the cattle “Pour-on” Ivermectin in the barn!
Some in the government will be opposed to Novavax because they have spent so much on the mRNA vaccines, and because they have endorsed them so throatily.
They will be able to say that the AZ, Moderna and Pfizer were pushed when that was all that was available even though they were less safe and less effective, but they will also therefore have to admit that the people that held out made the smarter choice. And a lot of those people don’t want to see people who did differently to them vindicated.
I wonder if they will try telling us that they will now get the Novavax in, but people who have not been vaccinated must get Pfizer first.
It would take remarkable stupidity, but: Cometh the hour, cometh the politician.
Sorry…damned quote fail. The humidity in Melbourne this morning has soggied up my operating neurons.
Mr Kates you appear to have totally capitulated to the idea, a fanciful idea at that, that there is this huge problem. There obviously isn’t.
The only thing that is blatantly happening is the constant erosion of the civil rights of the public. There is massive amounts of evidence that the so-called vaccines are harmful. All suppressed. Any unvaxxed now is that way now because they’ve seen through all the bullshit they’ve been subjected to by the MSM.
You don’t seem to realize this. Another vax doesn’t change my mind.
From discussions I’ve had with a pharmacist this “vaccine” is still dangerous because it contains what I understand is called the ‘prion’ protein which is the gain of function man made nasty bit that happened in the Whuhan Lab.
I won’t be taking Novavax either.
I understand that the vaccine does contain a “live”antigen such as the “gene” injections. As I understand it, in my limited way, the inactivated protein is presented in the injection to the immune system to identify as ‘the enemy”.
Even so, I am with you, custard, in that I am far from happy having anything whatsoever to do with a “gain-of-function” antigen designed specifically to easily penetrate our immune defences.
At the moment, I can see one of two scenarios for us. Either this virus will be a spent force by late 2022, or it will mount a ferocious battle to survive through ever more resistant variants, as epidemiologist Geert Van Den Bossche believes is already happening.
In any event, as the control group, at best us unvaccinated may be a well of natural immunity. God knows.
That’s why I intend to hold out until they hold me down and force the crap into my body. The human trials still have a long way to go and no one really knows what lies down the track.
Don’t hold your breath waiting for the new wonder vaxx Steve, Scotty announced much earlier in the year that it will be made available as a booster ONLY to those who have survived double doses of the other poisons.
They will probably relent though and make it available for the unjabbed as they want to get everyone onto the vaxx passport system. They need 100% compliance with that to roll out their Digital Id tyranny, they can’t do that while some remain unjabbed.
“Novavax’s vaccine has not made it to market yet but was the frontrunner ethically produced vaccine. Unfortunately, a fetal cell line was used in testing. Here’s a snapshot of this vaccine candidate’s research and development history:
Novavax used its SF9 insect cell line process throughout the vaccine’s development.
Multimerization was observed when evaluating the vaccine against different forms of the spike protein. Researchers designed a test in HEK-293T cells to better understand what they observed.
Novavax has chosen to delay seeking authorization to focus on production capabilities, according to this article in the Wall Street Journal.
The company has decided to delay application for authorization until the end of the year. ”
Pretty clear that novavax will be available to anyone that wants it.
I hope those objecting because of foetal cell line testing scrupulously avoid every single other medical and food item etc that has been tested on this cell line.
You are probably right. This is a very good reason for some of us to hold the line & not accept Novavax vaccination.
Not saying anything either way except Professor Petrovsky has given Novavax the nod and the product is now listed on the TGA website as being ‘under evaluation’ (in today’s world of pharmaceutical “efficacy and safety,” which seems to come down to “near enough is good enough,” what does that evaluation actually mean?”).
But Petrovsky seems to have the old style standards of an ethical researcher, which does provide consolation. Personally, I would prefer to have nothing – and if those back bench mps do their job, their will be legislation passed to stop all of it.
I’m with C.L. on this. We seem to be setting the ground work for mandatory medicinal interventions where the prognosis is recovery for the vast majority of cases and the only one’s that benefit from this are Big Pharma.
Why would you hope for that?
People can make their own choices.
You’ve saidthat about 5,000 times in the last 20 months.
They can’t stop it, it’s a States Rights issue.
All they can do is prevent the States from accessing the Centrelink Vaccination Register.
It would make a huge point of difference between the Parties and doom Albanese’s leadership, but Scotty isn’t interested.
You can shove all your venoms you murdering fascist subhuman scum.
Defiant unto death.
So do I, Rosie. I’m prepared to draw a line between items that were already in use before the fetal cell testing came into being (eg. aspirin) and those that are dependent on such testing and development, but the multi-million dollar baby parts industry is an abomination and should be ended. One way to do that is to refuse to be a part of it. Starve the beast.
Of course, as Pfizer has shown us, it’s not always easy to find out just what testing is done or, indeed, what is in any given product. Where we know, we can act.
How is it a secret that it uses saponin as an adjuvant?
Give me a list and I will try to keep my word.
The catastrophe is the police state that has emerged.
My body choice. If a vaccine doesn’t work at 90% double vaxxed, it is a case of fraud & quackery. Herd immunity doesn’t immediately turn up at 100% vaccination.
I want a passport but only if it’s safe to get!!!!
What a sad little thread this is.
I note Frau notafan has no inhibitions in even pretending anymore.
Why is leaving a country that has gone bonkers with fascism a bad idea, Squire?
This solves the wrong problem. I don’t want to chose from more varieties, I want to choose what goes in my body.
Well that comment triggered me. My son nearly died. Go suck Fauci’s or Bourla’s arsehole some more.
The only people who will be impressed by this are people who are shit scared of their shadows.
The whole pandemic is a manufactured load of crap.
Propaganda on steroids.