Month: January 2022
Mater’s Musings #48: YOUR risk of dying from Covid-19 – Part 2
Ok, due to the interest generated from my post yesterday, and the efforts to quantify the ACTUAL risk versus government propaganda, I took a path that is usually an enigma to my professionalism. I extrapolated off some grainy, low fidelity screenshots of government graphs which I found on the two relevant infographics (found here). I then used the age group percentage and applied it to the total Victorian case figure provided (18,628) to produce a rough number of cases per age group.
This is all pretty imprecise and, quite frankly, is an insult to my fastidious nature, but it does give a reasonable indication in terms of order of magnitude.
The claim (again):
The results from the very rough extrapolation of screenshots for the period 9 Jun-18 Oct 20, in Victoria:
So, as you can see, you need to be 70+ to be within cooee of the government provided figure. In fact, the figures for those below 50 years old show the government figure to be farcical.
The observant types will notice that they significantly understated the risk for those 70+ years of age…the very demographic which they SHOULD have been targeting, but given that the claim was published sometime after Aug 2021, it’s clear they were trying to scare the unvaccinated, younger demographic.
This is upside-down world stuff. Not what I’d expect from a responsible government.
Mater’s Musings #47: YOUR risk of dying from Covid-19
In its push to get you vaccinated, here we have the Federal Health Department giving YOU a definitive answer on what YOUR risk of dying from Covid-19 is:
Where do they get that figure from, I hear you ask. Well, when you follow the link they provide, it takes you to the website of an organisation called the ‘Australian Academy of Science’. Take note that they have science in their title, as I’ll loop back to that in a bit.
Continue reading “Mater’s Musings #47: YOUR risk of dying from Covid-19”
These covid vaxxines are dangerous
I can see that anyone who has taken the vaxxine begins from the premise that our governments are trying to do what’s best for us.
Perhaps you should have a look at the video at this link: The Pfizer Inoculations Do More Harm Than Good. It has been put together by the CanadianCovidCareAlliance. The “inoculation arm” discussed in the quote below were those who had actually had the Pfizer vaxxine administered. The “placebo arm” was the group that had had a placebo. This is what the video explains.
Pfizer’s own 6 month report data on its COVID-19 inoculation shows that greater illness and death in the inoculation arm than the placebo arm. Plus, poor trial design, missing data, underpowered studies, passive surveillance and more.
That is, the group who were tested by given the experimental vaxxine had more sickness and deaths than among the placebo group!
This video runs for over 38 minutes but it is both comprehensive and gripping. It is a serious attempt to make others understand just how dangerous these vaxxines are.
To have the data explained more briefly you should also go to this, which only takes 18 minutes but you might be put off by the tone of the presenter: Pfizer Vaccine EXPOSED! Less than 1% effective, Did More Harm Than Good, They Knew It and Tricked You. This is what we have.
Pfizer used a math trick to make people believe their vaccine was 95% effective, but the truth is it was 0.8% effective.
That is, it would do you virtually no good at all, assuming it didn’t actually do you harm. What do you have to lose by going to the link?
Geniuses at the Australian newspaper keep on giving
In my previous post I quoted the Australian newspaper editorial. It’s gift that keeps on giving. I expect that it will go on giving ineptly throughout this new year.
This from the last day of the old year:
The tragic death of a child who was Covid-positive in South Australia is a devastating reminder of how potentially dangerous the virus can be. Authorities have yet to determine the cause of the child’s death, Premier Steven Marshall said.
I don’t like making any kind of point built on a child’s death. It is so sad and tragic whatever the cause. But how in the world does this kind of editorial ever pass muster at any sensible newspaper?
To the geniuses at the Australian. If the child did not die of Covid then it isn’t a devastating reminder of how potentially dangerous the virus can be. It’s most definitely, whatever the outcome, a devastating reminder of how dumb and irresponsible you are.
The same geniuses also drew attention to the UK parliament’s Jacob Rees-Mogg claiming that nine out of ten patients in intensive care in London were unvaccinated. Maybe, I don’t know. But, to balance the scales, and provide useful information, perhaps they might have also noted that the latest UK government Covid surveillance report (for the four weeks to December 16) shows that the rate of infection among the double vaccinated is higher than among the unvaccinated. My simple average across the age groups puts the comparison at 15.8 versus 12.7 per 1000.
A devastating potential conclusion: you’re at more risk of catching Covid from the vaxxed than the unvaxxed. HNY but beware the vaxxed!
