Knowing Hiding where the bodies are buried

Moving to a “post pandemic world,” two Australian states – Queensland and Western Australia – have made two of their most senior pandemic response public servants – QLD’s former CHO Jeanette Young and W.A.’s Commissioner of Police, State Emergency Co-ordinator and previously its Vaccine Commander, Chris Dawson – their respective state’s new vice-regal appointees. In doing so it would seem both governments have created an insurmountable obstacle against these previous “servants of the people” being required to give evidence at any future, formal inquiry into the pandemic.

Will some of the other States move also to stymie the airing of what really happened over these last two and a bit years and utilise as well a “vice regal strategy”? In the case of Victoria, the sidelining of certain minions must be tempting for Daniel Andrews, given the debasing of individual liberty and the abuse of citizens’ rights, including the shooting in the back with plastic bullets of innocent people at The Shrine.

In Victoria, Linda Dessau, the current governor, has been in place since July 2015, while in NSW Margaret Beazley has held the vice regal position since May 2019. It would not be inconceivable therefore for either Premier soon to announce a change to their state’s vice-regal position.

So will we see Victoria’s CHO, Brett Sutton, or their Police Commissioner, Shane Patton, get elbowed upwards? Rather than giving evidence before a Royal Commission, what are the odds for Kerry Chant becoming the next NSW Governor? At the federal level, could we expect Dr Brendan Murphy, our previous CMO and now head of the Federal Department of Health, or Adjunct Professor Skerritt, the current head of the TGA, being re-moved up and away to a “safe haven” in the not too distant future?

But any hope for a formal inquiry will be up against it and what would be examined should one actually be announced. Reported yesterday by the ABC was changes to the W. A. State’s Emergency Management Act (2005), which enables the government to declare an emergency, thereby enabling the government access to the emergency powers, including the declaring of a pandemic, which first requires the State’s Emergency Coordinator, currently Police Commissioner Dawson, provide that advice to the Emergency Services Minister who then makes a declaration every two weeks. In moving to extend W.A.’s pandemic powers until January 2023 in State Parliament on Tuesday, the Emergency Services Minister, Stephen Dawson (no relation to Chris Dawson it would seem) revealed that the fortnightly advice from the Emergency Coordinator was given verbally at each fortnightly meeting. With no formal written advice to examine, evidence taken under oath from W.A.’s Emergency Coordinator (Police Commissioner Dawson) would be central to an examination of how decisions were made in that State during these two long years.

One thing is clear: no one at any level of government is even slightly interested in examining formally how Australia came almost within a hair’s breadth of dictatorial government and the mandating of vaccinations despite our constitutional limitations, if Scott Morrison is to be relied on to announce such an investigation. When asked on the campaign trail about a Royal Commission into the pandemic, Morrison responded that “the pandemic was not over” so an examination of the last two years, he said, could not be had. Yet some days earlier in relation to the Reserve Bank increasing interest rates, his spin was that this move amounted to the “strengthening of the economy,” because we were “through the pandemic.”

Throughout this election campaign there have been few questions from any quarter on what the government did or allowed to be done to citizens during the pandemic, apart from whether the vaccine roll-out was too slow. In fact, the PM has only really conceded on that one point, saying at the leaders debate on Nine last Sunday night, and in response to a question from the Opposition Leader, that “it really was a race.” Thus showing that neither the media or the Opposition is really interested in what happened.

So we sit and we wait for the truth to be revealed, which will happen, sooner or later. And as we wait, our level of trust in government is at an all-time low, which is why the right-of-centre minor parties it would seem have gained momentum.

65 thoughts on “Knowing Hiding where the bodies are buried”

  1. One thing is clear: no one at any level of government is even slightly interested in examining formally how Australia came almost within a hair’s breadth of dictatorial government

    ‘Almost’?


    Report comment

    50
  2. There is zero likelihood of any kind of commission into the handling of Covid.

    Even now people are still losing their jobs due to vaccine mandates and the Press seem disinterested.

    You see articles about those who have had bad cases of Covid but never see any relating to difficulties getting exemptions , even after bad 1st Vax, or bad reactions to vaccines.

    In Qld I can see from Courier Mail that CHO and the local guru Dr Paul Griffin that they would love to mandate the 3rd jab.

    I have zero confidence in MSM holding anybody to account.


    Report comment

    43
  3. Slowly we all wake up.

    17,000 physicians and medical scientists declare that the state of medical emergency must be lifted, scientific integrity restored, and crimes against humanity addressed.

    We, the physicians and medical scientists of the world, united through our loyalty to the Hippocratic Oath, recognize that the disastrous COVID-19 public health policies imposed on doctors and our patients are the culmination of a corrupt medical alliance of pharmaceutical, insurance, and healthcare institutions, along with the financial trusts which control them. They have infiltrated our medical system at every level, and are protected and supported by a parallel alliance of big tech, media, academics and government agencies who profited from this orchestrated catastrophe.

    https://globalcovidsummit.org/news/declaration-iv-restore-scientific-integrity


    Report comment

    27
  4. ‘Almost’?
    FD, I put in ‘almost’ because it seems that we may just have dodged the “permanency” that looked a surety during the worst of it.


    Report comment

    6
  5. The fact that this ass- covering is necessary means that they know what’s coming is going to be bad . So far the push back has been minimal but I would guess that they see a political change coming that will demand accountability . Interesting times….


    Report comment

    17
  6. The treatment of the public under the hysterical response to COVID ranks as second only to the destruction of our power system under the similarly hysterical and fraudulent response to the climate alarmism which has permeated western society courtesy of the zombie left and complicit media.


    Report comment

    37
  7. Agree with Bourne1879. Those who perpetrated the outrageous, not to mention ridiculous, conga line of restrictions, enforcements, ‘vaccinations’, ‘boosters’ etc will never allow an enquiry into their actions, especially not whilst they are still in positions of power.

    In time, when all those involved are much older (or dead) an enquiry is possible but many will say “why bother, that was over (ten, fifteen, twenty) years go”. And in any event, those responsible for the edicts will say they were acting on the “best medical advice” available at the time. Those responsible for enforcement will say they had a statutory obligation to act in accordance with directions given by government. The medical fraternity will say it was a ‘one in a hundred year event’ and they acted on the best information available, but it was a swirling and dynamic environment.

    The MSM, if even asked to account, will say they report and don’t make the laws nor are they responsible for enforcement.

    The enquiry, if it ever happens (which I doubt), will be headed by a person hand-picked by government and who will be unable to find any evidence of wrongdoing but may express some ‘concern’ at certain aspects but the terms of the enquiry disallow further examination and/or the files are misplaced, the persons are dead etc. Ultimately, a number of recommendations will be made and those will be promptly filed and forgotten.

    Nobody will ever, ever, be found to have overstepped their authority; democracy was not threatened; and, the actions of those involved were reasonable in all the circumstances.

    I will bet anything you care to name.


    Report comment

    47
  8. Let’s see who holds the balance of power in the senate come the election and what undertakings they may be able to extract from the government of the day. That’s about the only hope.


    Report comment

    32
  9. I should have mentioned the only possible exception may occur for political reasons. For example, if a Liberal govt ever replaces Labor in Victoria, the Libs might want to bury Andrews. Ditto in the West, or anywhere else.

    Having said that, I can’t see Albo wanting to rake over the coals at a federal level.


    Report comment

    9
  10. Well said Speedbox.

    Although Andrews will probably sneak in again at November he still faces a real risk of being turfed out.

    If the Libs do follow through on their commitment for a RC then it’s going to be real squeaky bum time for this evil cretin.

    I have utter contempt for 95% of the political class, but with Andrews he should be facing serious time in jail.


    Report comment

    46
  11. Without the formal commissioning of an inquiry, on the medical side, the ongoing debacle, seen most clearly in the ramping of ambulances, especially in Victoria, is perhaps the way that a lid will be blown.

    Although last night on Credlin, the shadow health spokesperson, Georgie Crozier, could not/would not explain the reason for the ramping and why many patients are dying in ambulances while waiting for medical attention.

    Letting unvaccinated medical and ancillary staff return immediately to work with no further jabbing of anyone would be a beginning to alleviating the dire state of the hospital systems across Australia.

    As far as an inquiry, I really think it’s going to be a court case that begins the process – that is, unless none of the minor freedom parties get in to parliament and are able to force an inquiry. There is a case coming up in W.A. in July, with the lead complainant a copper, that may begin the process of examination of what has happened to citizens in this country. The court has just allowed the complainant to have expert advice presented, against the wishes of the state’s CHO. A class action is being put together over there too.


    Report comment

    23
  12. “I have zero confidence in MSM holding anybody to account.”

    As do I. One of the biggest problems across the West today is the biased progressive media. Ninety percent of the MSM engage in deliberate lies, obfuscation and gaslighting. The so called “right-wing” media, such as Sky and The Australian, are slightly better but not much better. I can’t see democracies surviving without brutal and honest media and journalists willing to tackle all issues in an even-handed manner and willing to hold ALL politicians to account, regardless of their politics. But this is not happening. A recent example is the coverage of Katherine Deves….the gaslighting by the MSM around the whole sinister transgender movement is a scandal.

    Journalists are now, more often than not, far-left progressive activists, they don’t even try to hide their biases. Whilst a large part of the rot lies in the fact that journalism is now a university degree (the old cadetship system was far better), there also another reason which I find interesting. There’s a great Canadian journalist by the name of Trish Wood. Trish began her journalism back in the heady 1970s. She now runs a popular podcast which is well worth listening to. Over the decades she’s worked for most major North American media outlets and she covered the AIDS crisis back in the 1980s. At the time she called out Fauci for his corruption and mishandling of the crisis. So when Fauci was given the task of running the Covid pandemic response two years ago she knew the response would be deliberately political, aimed at destroying Trump and that things would go awry and of course, they did.

    However what I find interesting is that Wood argues that a lot of the problems with contemporary journalism is that it’s now the preserve of smug progressive elites, the career choice for the privileged children of the upper middle classes and the rich. This is in contrast to the past where kids from all walks of life became journalists. These children aren’t hungry for the truth, they’re only interested in propagating their truth, and their truth only contains the narratives they’re imbued with and they believe, be it on climate change, Covid, transgender rubbish, conservatives are evil and so on.

    There are big stories to be told about Covid, about transgenderism, about big pharma, about the women behind the Christian Porter scandal but few if any journalists bother to investigate.* Perhaps they find these stories too scary but once upon a time a credible journalist of old would have seized upon a “too scary” story.

    I make an exception for some journalists, such as Sharri Markson who’s done great work on the China lab, and Bernard Lane who’s done fantastic work on the insidious transgender nonsense…..and there are a few others. However it’s worth nothing that Bernard Lane has been targeted by activists who’ve lodged complaints with the biased Press Council and Markson has been mocked by other so called journalists, particularly at the tax funded ABC, for her work on the Covid lab theory. Clearly these other journalists aren’t interested in the truth.


    Report comment

    36
  13. I should add that good journalism is all about “finding where the bodies are buried”….if you’re not interested in that then you’re a propagandist.


    Report comment

    16
  14. Cassie:
    However what I find interesting is that Wood argues that a lot of the problems with contemporary journalism is that it’s now the preserve of smug progressive elites, the career choice for the privileged children of the upper middle classes and the rich. This is in contrast to the past where kids from all walks of life became journalists. These children aren’t hungry for the truth, they’re only interested in propagating their truth, and their truth only contains the narratives they’re imbued with and they believe, be it on climate change, Covid, transgender rubbish, conservatives are evil and so on.

    There are big stories to be told about Covid, about transgenderism, about big pharma, about the women behind the Christian Porter scandal but few if any journalists bother to investigate.* Perhaps they find these stories too scary but once upon a time a credible journalist of old would have seized upon a “too scary” story.

    plus lots, Cassie.
    When I was writing this post, one of the main thoughts I had was are any fine investigative journalists left to find out what happened? And if so, could they get into the public domain any of what really happened published?


    Report comment

    14
  15. Excelling point about journalists Cassie. I’ve read similar about the US media, when it was predominantly cadetships and seen as a working class kind of job you’d see a wide variety of views and actual quality investigative journalism.
    As with many industries, the professionalization with degrees has created a status driven employment. It’s become a fairy tale, just look at how often things become a xxxxgate. There’s not the drive to find truth, it’s all about taking down the conservative or right wing man, and virtue signaling their allegiance to the correct views.


    Report comment

    16
  16. Speedbox at 10.31am…

    100% spot on. Anyone who has seen “Yes, Minister” can tell you this.

    Pauline Hanson, Rowan Dean, Peta Credlin, Andrew Bolt(?), and whoever else is calling for a Royal Commission must surely know that this is how it would pan out.


    Report comment

    10
  17. Bluey says:
    May 13, 2022 at 11:25 am
    …..become a xxxxgate.

    As an aside Bluey, that ‘xxxxgate’ thing is so tedious. Nobody under 50 years old* would have any ‘living knowledge’ of Watergate, Nixon etc. meaning that unless they actually looked up the reasons why the MSM use ‘xxxxgate’, they would have no idea of the relevance/history to the ‘gate’ suffix.

    * even those of us in our 60s were only young(ish) men at the time.


    Report comment

    9
  18. That making journalism a uni indoctrination course is really paying off now isn’t it.

    I’d love to think the WA case will lead anywhere but “ emergency powers” appears to be the ultimate ace card.

    McClown is engaged in exactly what I predicted, not letting powers lapse until a legal block is put on any cases for damages etc.
    I’d be betting there will be another election run in WA before they allow the emergency powers to end.


    Report comment

    16
  19. Morrison responded that “the pandemic was not over” so an examination of the last two years, he said, could not be had.

    This from the same totally unprincipled arsehole who said that “free speech doesn’t create one job.”


    Report comment

    27
  20. When I was writing this post, one of the main thoughts I had was are any fine investigative journalists left to find out what happened? And if so, could they get into the public domain any of what really happened published?

    I think there are such investigative journalists around, but you will probably know them as
    ‘conspiracy theorists’. After all, if it’s not reported in the MSM, it can’t be true, can it?


    Report comment

    12
  21. 17,000 physicians and medical scientists declare that the state of medical emergency must be lifted, scientific integrity restored, and crimes against humanity addressed.

    No credence was given to the

    Great Barrington Declaration

    , or the subsequent Rome Declaration in which thousands of eminent physicians and epidemiologists et al expressed their opposition to the genetic vaccine in lieu of early treatment. Rather, they were ridiculed & discredited by medical technocrats and pollies around the world.

    Bar Beach Swimmer is so right – pollies, bureaucrats and most of media are pretending as though nothing much has happened in the last two years. They seem to have no concept (or cognitive dissonance is rampant) of the absolute rage that people are harbouring in respect to the fruitless disruption to their lives and livelihood as a result of ignorant, ill advised and heartless policies.


    Report comment

    27
  22. And in any event, those responsible for the edicts will say they were acting on the “best medical advice” available at the time. Those responsible for enforcement will say they had a statutory obligation to act in accordance with directions given by government. The medical fraternity will say it was a ‘one in a hundred year event’ and they acted on the best information available, but it was a swirling and dynamic environment.

    Speedbox, I think you are absolutely correct. This is what I fear. It is entirely consistent with the way the technocrats and pollies seek cover when the chips are down.

    Those I have spoken to amongst the dissenters in medical circles have said that the only way of bringing them to justice – is literally through “justice” i.e. the courts.
    I know of at least one action that is being pursued right now by people who understand the machinations of the medical/bureacratic world and how to negotiate it. God speed their cause.


    Report comment

    30
  23. “Nobody will ever, ever, be found to have overstepped their authority; democracy was not threatened; and, the actions of those involved were reasonable in all the circumstances. “

    Well, of course – that’s a given. No such inquiry has ever been convened when the answer was not already known, because that is a basic precept of such inquiries.
    Another is that you need someone “sound” to run it – that is, someone who is desperate for some “reward” (promotion, award, grant, sinecure etc) that can only be given by Government and therefore knows which side of his or her bread is buttered, and therefore which way any “benefit of the doubt” should lie, which issues are “important” and which are “within the terms of reference” and so on.

    It doesn’t matter which party has power, the system (including those who abuse it) must be protected at all costs. If that means being a little careless with the truth, then that is the price we must pay for “public confidence” in the establishment – the whole system might collapse without such confidence, don’t you know. And then there would be chaos and destruction – which would be “bad”. So we want to avoid that, don’t we?
    After all, what’s right is a matter of perspective, isn’t it?
    Better a small lie than widespread anarchy, surely.
    Don’t worry, it’s all for the greater good.
    If you rock the boat, it might be you who falls overboard.
    And so on and so forth – you get the idea.


    Report comment

    14
  24. So they haven’t allowed expert witnesses in these court cases? Great. The justice system is just as corrupt as the medical system. Vale British Empire.


    Report comment

    10
  25. Vicki – during covid, it was impossible not to notice how the politicians always prefixed their remarks by saying “on the medical advice…..” and the medical fraternity always prefixed their remarks with “on the available evidence…..” or “the overseas data shows……”.

    Everyone, who made any kind of decision or recommendation, used a prefix to push the responsibility elsewhere.

    I would love to see some of these people in the dock – but don’t believe it will ever happen. When the Qld CHO (Jeannette Young) was given the position of Governor of Qld, I remarked to Mrs Speedbox that the fix was in.

    It will be impossible to prove that actions taken under the emergency powers were malicious and/or unconstitutional and/or unlawful. And remember, even if some independent Justice found in favour of a plaintiff, any govt can make a law retrospectively absolving itself, or any person it deems appropriate, blameless.

    I think we can howl at the moon as much as we like – but it won’t make any difference.


    Report comment

    27
  26. but it won’t make any difference

    Which is why, Speedbox, the minor right-of-centre parties are gaining on the SFLs at this election. The powers that be will have to be dragged kicking and screaming on this. Best of luck to the LibDems, ON, the UAP and the party on medical integrity. We need them all.


    Report comment

    25
  27. “I should add that good journalism is all about “finding where the bodies are buried”….if you’re not interested in that then you’re a propagandist.”

    How outdated Cassie!
    These days, it’s about “making a difference” and “supporting the cause”, about “telling A story” not “telling THE story”, about “audience engagement”.
    Don’t you know how much it costs to do a real investigative report? How boring those things are to many readers most of the time?
    Many more clicks (and $) in engaging the emotions – facts are so DULL!


    Report comment

    9
  28. BBS – agreed. And I, for one, will make sure my vote is directed to them.

    I would be perfectly happy to see a number of these individuals face justice (or at least be held accountable/reputation trashed/legacy destroyed), but have zero confidence.


    Report comment

    8
  29. If as I believe, there are long term major side effects from the Jab jab booster booster, there will be nowhere for the medicos and pollies to hide. And there will be justice,not for the lock downs or destroying the economy but for poisoning a large majority of the electorate. (not me).


    Report comment

    17
  30. Big_Nambassays:
    May 13, 2022 at 1:43 pm
    If as I believe, there are long term major side effects from the Jab jab booster booster, there will be nowhere for the medicos and pollies to hide. And there will be justice,not for the lock downs or destroying the economy but for poisoning a large majority of the electorate. (not me).

    If the jabs are as bad as some say, the courts are going to be the least of their problems. It’s very difficult to stop someone who knows they have nothing to lose.


    Report comment

    14
  31. Zyco,
    Imo, Hollingsworth wasn’t protected because he was a “churchie” and therefore to the left “fair” game.

    On top of that, when he was selected there was a huge blowup over the “separation of church and state” which at the time few people properly understood – and was designed to undermine him and Howard by Labor and the left.

    This time, no one in big govt, the left, the managerial class, the media – but I repeat myself – wants any of this to be aired, because they’re all in it one way or another.


    Report comment

    12
  32. “On top of that, when he was selected there was a huge blowup over the “separation of church and state” which at the time few people properly understood – and was designed to undermine him and Howard by Labor and the left.”

    I was opposed to the appointment of Hollingsworth for the very reason you state above however I couldn’t believe the witch hunt against him. Even though it was years before social media, it was a portent of cancel culture.


    Report comment

    5
  33. Cassie, the church/state stuff is about not denying anyone who has a faith, or who does not, from holding any position. That is, you don’t need to be of the established church to be selected.


    Report comment

    4
  34. Cassie

    biased progressive media

    Make that biased so-called “progressive media”. They are regressive, not progressive. Don’t let them get away with that particular lie.


    Report comment

    3
  35. Zycon

    By the way being vice- regal did not protect Peter Hollingsworth.

    But he was a Christian, not a so-called “progressive”. That makes all the difference.


    Report comment

    7
  36. it is possible if not probable, that the outbreak of deadly hepatitis in children being experienced in the U.S., UK and Ireland springs from the J&J and/or Astra-Zeneca adenovirus vector vaccines.

    has a non-replicating adenovirus recombined with its wild version…


    Report comment

    5
  37. There’s so much to detest here: The Federal government and Morrison, the state premiers (even of NSW), the MSM and social media, the medicos, the TGA, the oh-so-dumb bovine voters of QLD, VIC , SA -all of them in fact except voters in NSW.

    The morons on weblogs revelling in the further exclusion of people who refused to board the ‘we’re all in together’ train.

    Its a veritable hate fest I’ve got going here. And Morrison is at the top of the pile. Even Turnbull was preferable to this useless excrescence of a man.


    Report comment

    5
  38. Cassie – agree with what you wrote. The upper middle being impractical and low skilled go to journalism, law and education. These “disciplines” do not need maths or science but the ability to convince others – this has become a natural as those with the economic power throw their weight around.
    These people have also made jobs in charities and ngo desirable with the tax concessional salary incentives. So becoming a professional amendicat is desirable – no embarrassment. Check out Costello son who quit being a. Liquidator to go to a charity as it’s fun, no stress and it’s easy.
    Deplorables – the sole traders, trades, cnr solicitor, go, accountant, engineers.


    Report comment

    6
  39. We were just being warmed up … the laws are still very much in place, ready for Part 2:
    [p.3] “As detailed below, the amended Defence Act expands the military’s powers, including to kill people, beyond situations where commanders claim it is necessary to protect a life. Lethal force can be used to protect ‘declared infrastructure’ or end ‘threats to … public health or public safety’. In addition, military personnel have been further protected from legal liability by adding a new defence of acting in ‘good faith’.”
    http://www.unswlawjournal.unsw.edu.au/forum_article/another-expansion-of-military-call-out-powers-in-australia-some-critical-legal-constitutional-and-political-questions/


    Report comment

    4
  40. There will be no meaningful inquiry, at best a shallow whitewash.

    As I remarked on the OT yesterday I’ve noticed that in the election campaign no pollie is talking about Covid, nor the totalitarian methods they took during the last two years. Silence. It’s like it never happened.

    One thing which has occurred as a result, though, is the major parties are now closer together than ever before. The elites are behind the walls of their castle and aren’t letting ordinary people in. As an example Lib elites are so hostile to PHON, FFS and UAP that they’re preferencing Labor over them. The election campaign is like kabuki.


    Report comment

    14
  41. Morrison responded that “the pandemic was not over

    Given he followed the advice of the WHO back in 2020, why is he now ignoring their advice that the “pandemic” is actually over.


    Report comment

    7
  42. My 2c worth musing on the above. Could be wrong but searches have uncovered a few articles that refer to immunity of the crown from statute. Apparently there is no automatic immunity in Australian law or constitutions, which is an outlier compared to the rest of the world. If and it is a big if, the opposition when it becomes government could pursue Sutton and even Janette Young if they choose to. However the squealing would be heard on Mars.

    Secondly I believe both parties are knee deep in it anyway. Unified Security, especially the deregistered subsidiary and recommendation of charges by ASIC against a director that went down the memory hole. I remember Credlin & Murray both hot on the trail then it went quiet as if they were quietly told to back off or else. National Cabinet docs being classified after private journalists tried to get FOI access. Wagners deal with Palace”chook” for a Quarantine centre in the middle of nowhere. No interest in the exemptions given including the Northern Beaches event that was blamed on a flight attendant but as FTB pointed out was much more likely someone with a diplomatic passport. I could go on but it would end up a word wall.

    Agree with Bruce above, any inquiry will be a shallow whitewash.


    Report comment

    8
  43. RD, yes, there are so many ends joining together to have made this all possible.

    Morrison tells us today that he will change! But no mention of how he enabled the “state” to take over our lives. “Forget it,” he says; “don’t look back,” he cajoles.

    Never have we voted Liars; always, we have looked with trepidation on a Labor win. Now, however, having first voted for every right-of-centre minor party we can find on the ballot, we really don’t give a f..k if that dumb fool Albo ends up in The Lodge if Morrison and his low value cronies in the Libs are out on their ear.


    Report comment

    3
  44. Hows that jab jab booster booster working for you?

    According to global databases, Australia led the world in per-capita COVID infections (if you ignore the tiny islands of Montserrat, Anguilla and The Falklands).

    On Friday 54,591 cases were reported across Australia, on the back two consecutive days of about 58,000 cases, with Western Australia bracing for new infection records.

    Saturday’s numbers moved the official seven-day average to above 48,000 daily cases, putting Australia behind only Germany and the US in total new daily cases recorded.


    Report comment

    4
  45. Damon:
    I am not a lawyer, so why would vice-regals be immune from testifying?

    Neither am I a lawyer, but given that the vice-regal positions are the umpires of our system of govt enabling the relevant office holder to prorogue the parliament, given the right circumstances.

    Were evidence of a type and extent to be taken in a formal inquiry from a Governor/Governor General that revealed that the govt of which that person now provides the vice regal responsibilities, but in their previous position that person was central to the actions of that same administration, and which could necessitate that the Govt’s commission, or a key position holder in that govt, be compelled to resign, pending criminal investigations – it is inconceivable that they themselves should then remain in that vice regal position, and would be under pressure to resign as well.

    That would be a constitutional crisis. I cannot see any Royal Commission calling the vice regal because of that.


    Report comment

  46. Anchor What:

    As somebody here or the old site used to say, there can be no properly functioning democracy unless there is honest media.

    Probably me – “Who would have thought the strongest foundation of Democracy would also be its Achilles Heel.”
    I take no comfort in being proven right.


    Report comment

    1
  47. Cool Snoopy:

    “Lethal force can be used to protect ‘declared infrastructure’ or end ‘threats to … public health or public safety’.” So who gets to define the infrastructure or Threats to public health or safety? Dan Andrews?
    The framework of a tyranny is being put together in front of us.



    Report comment

    3
  48. Yes, Winston, you are absolutely correct. These are the people who control what definitions are applied to particular words, so as to produce the outcome they want to achieve.
    I could see the Professor who wrote that article was using the language of shock horror, as if he perceived what may indeed be the result. I note he has continued to write on this topic: see the “publications” tab just under his profile photo for his more recent works.
    https://www.westernsydney.edu.au/staff_profiles/WSU/professor_michael_head


    Report comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.