One ring party to rule them all. Linda can be Saruman.

I always thought that she was Dildo Baggins along with Wenny Pong, Kenneally, that slag from Canbrrrrrr and that Bishop tart.

Two friends have been diagnosed with severe GERD (gastric reflux) recently and one of them (referred to a specialist) has been told it is a symptom of Long Covid. My granddaughter (who has suffered from GERD for a while) has recently developed more commonly occurring symptoms.

For this reason I have been searching the internet for information about the relationship between gastric reflux and Covid. I have discovered that it is known by the medical profession as a relatively well known symptom of Covid and Long Covid. I thought I knew a fair bit about Covid, having spent many hours of every day from early 2021 to late last year researching it, yet, I was not aware of this relationship. I then found at least one medical journal article which connected the gastric reflux symptom also the the Covid vaccines – which is logical, since research on Covid/GERD has postulated that the spike protein is responsible!

Yet, predictably, I have found only one article (there may be more) connecting GERD to an adverse reaction to the Covid vaccines. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9250884/

‘Peter Dutton has proposed a federal ban on Nazi symbols as the Coalition takes up Labor’s challenge to condemn Nazi glorification…’

As bad as Labor is, they always have the Libs dancing like a puppet on a string to their tune.

White House Neocon Spokesman Admits – They Do Not Want Peace in Ukraine

“I have had two employees from Ukraine – Kiev and Donetsk. The one from Kiev just mouths the standard Ukrainian propaganda. If they give up the Donbas, they will then want all of Ukraine. The UK is deeply involved walking hand and hand with Biden into world war III. They have clearly crossed the Rubicon here and for no justification. Had they simply honored the Minsk Agreement and let the Donbas, which is ethnically Russian, separate from a regime that hates their guts the war would be over in 5 minutes.

Instead, Britain appears to have been planning to give Ukraine nuclear weapons with depleted Uranium. Putin has come out and warned the UK that “the delivery and use of depleted uranium missiles by the Ukrainian Armed Forces will be perceived as an attack against Russia with a weapon that has a ‘nuclear component’.” Putin elaborated:

“Today it became known that the United Kingdom, through the Deputy Head of the Ministry of Defense of the country, announced the supply of not only tanks to Ukraine but also shells with depleted uranium. It seems that the West really decided to fight Russia in the last Ukrainian not with words, but with deeds Russia will be forced to react once the collective West starts using weapons with a nuclear component.”

There are some who believe that Ukraine should just be nuked. Give the people 2 weeks to flee to Poland or Germany, and then nuke the region and make it unlivable. That is basically the legion that Rome certainly razed the city entirely, but there are no contemporary sources stating that the Romans salted the land to prevent the city of Carthage from rising a fourth time. The Greek writer from the 1st century BC, Diodorus Siculus, informs us that the city had been razed and Carthaginians destroyed. Horace informs us that after the city was destroyed, the land was symbolically plowed. Polybius in his “The Histories” makes no mention of the land being salted just that the city was completely destroyed. Appian of Alexandria does record that Carthage was reconstructed by the first Emperor Augustus (27BC-14AD) and to avoid the evil spells that were cast on the ground, Carthage was rebuilt in a different location.

Surely, if Russia nuked Ukraine that would kill the European breadbasket and it would guarantee Ukraine’s neutrality. Is that the only way to terminate this Neocon Proxy Way and save the world?

The three Punic Wars (264 BC–146 BC) between Rome and Carthage were a turning point in the history of the Mediterranean world and, more than any other conflict, the Second Punic War (218 BC–201 BC) appears to have been a defining time in Roman history. We also see the debasement in that coinage of Carthage as they waged war to defeat Rome. You can see the early silver coinage debased as the war unfolded.

As Hannibal marched through Spain and invaded Italy from the North, Rome issued its first gold coinage more as a symbol of wealth to the other Italian city-states that they should standby Rome and not join Hannibal.

On the Roman side, we also see the consequence of the war with the debasement of the silver quadrigatus, which was the Greek denomination of the didrachm they complied with for trade with the Greek world. Here too, we can see the cost of war is not just the lives lost, but also the inflation and the monetary debasement.

Hannibal’s war also forced Rome to establish the denarius, which was the weight reduction from the Greek standard of the Didrachm 6.5 grams to 4.0 grams in 211BC. Even though Rome won, the lesson here is that sometimes wars result in the complete collapse of a monetary standard and the rebirth of a new currency. This is what we face. The Neocons care nothing about the economics, nor about the lives of the people they send to die for their arrogance. They are the worst of humanity and should be driven from governments on a global scale.

Indeed, King Louis XIV (1643-1715) was on his deathbed when he lamented.

“I have been too fond of war.”
Meanwhile, the arrogance of the Neocons trying to dictate to the world and ordering China not to help Russia, Xi’s trip to Russia had no other outcome but to support Russia as he called Putin a ‘dear friend’ as China now pushes back against U.S. power knowing full well the real agenda here is to weaken Russia and then for NATO to invade on any pretense to destroy Russia once and for all. This is the Neocon’s dream and they could care less about the Ukrainian people. I have warned that the Ukrainian people are there to be slaughtered for the glory of the Neocons.”

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/war/white-house-neocon-spokesman-admits-they-do-not-want-peace-in-ukraine/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=RSS

Senator Thorpe says transphobes not welcome on Aboriginal land

Who made you boss lady?

While I hope the Voice referendum fails, I do not believe that it will, the left have taken over our education systems and have been for many years producing socialist woke idiots. People under 35 voting in this referendum are followers and will not or cannot think for themselves.

Should mention, in case forgotten, that that was in response to a proscription by Robert Sewell.

OldOzzie says:
March 23, 2023 at 1:14 pm

If a Voice to Parliament referendum were held today, how would you vote?

Yes 19 %
No 71 %
Undecided 10 %

7827 votes

9065 votes now and % have not changed, maybe there is hope.

When Captain Cook landed on this land (And no one knew that it was called ‘Horse Tralliar’ as the Queen once said) he might have thought that he was in ‘Who knows where’…………………….And who would he negotiate with? FFS

Wasn’t Lydia blocking the Pride parade only a few weeks back? What happened?

Iirc, she was blocking the police float.

I can’t wait for Hollywood to remake 1984 with Minitru employee Winston Smith played by a black lesbian.

BIG PATRIARCHY IS WATCHING YOU!

Perhaps, scene where she is seated in the single spot in the apartment where the Telescreen camera is not visible, Winstonita Ngsmith can write in her diary “If there is any hope it lies in blokes who have cut their dicks off and wear frocks, and shielas who have had their tits hacked off and their forearms flensed and the skin fashioned into tubes they pass off as penises.”

And that poignant last scene where she is sitting in a cafe, smoking Rape Culture Cigarettes and sipping Rape Culture Gin, when she looks up at the telescreen and sees the face of Big Patriarchy, shimmering through her tears of joy, of happiness, happiness that she had finally won victory over herself and now did indeed love Big Patriarchy.

How sad! .. my youngest daughter, who’s had all 17 jabs, tellz me she has caught BAT FLU for the 3rd time .. life is sooooo unfair …… LOL!

The latest on the local bloke, being prosecuted for putting a culvert on a creek flowing through his property, and upsetting the mythical Wagayl- given the possibility of a prison sentence, a local couple presented him with a cake, baked in his honor – with a hacksaw blade sticking out of it…

I was 10 years old in 1967, so I spent the first 10 years of my life not being counted.

Linda Burney has never been called to account for such an outrageous lie.

Must be a new variant.

And the irony! …. she was on a 4 day cruise Sydney/Brisbane/Sydney … LOL!

Here you are stupid Stencho Pantyhose, Dotty Dot of Dottiness and the short arse Italian J erk Off Cretin…………………………………

The 1933 Bank Holiday – Can it Happen Again?

QUESTION: Marty there are a lot of people who seem to be trying to create a panic. Some are claiming the stock market will plunge by 50%. Others are saying nothing will survive other than gold. It seems like none of these people have any sense of what is really unfolding. They were saying the same thing for different reasons before the banking crisis. Can you offer any historical perspective?

Thank you. You seem to be the only real source these days.

Pete

ANSWER: The Bank Holiday took place the first week of March 1933. It began with governors closing down the banks in their states. Once one began, like COVID rules, they quickly jumped on the bandwagon. As reported by March 4th, 1933, some 41 states had already declared a banking holiday. Back then, the president took office in March – not January. Thus, Roosevelt was sworn in on March 4th, 1933. As the new president, FDR delivered what is arguably his best-known speech.

“So, first of all, let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is…fear itself — nameless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance. In every dark hour of our national life a leadership of frankness and of vigor has met with that understanding and support of the people themselves which is essential to victory. And I am convinced that you will again give that support to leadership in these critical days.”

The following day, Roosevelt declared a national banking holiday on March 5th, 1933. Then Congress responded by passing the Emergency Banking Act of 1933 on March 9th, 1933. This action was combined with the Federal Reserve’s commitment to supply unlimited amounts of currency to reopened banks. Back then, they effectively created a de facto 100% deposit insurance and this was before the FDIC was created.

However, what the history books have omitted because it revealed the real reason for the major banking crisis, was the confiscation of gold precisely as Germany did in December 1922 seizing 10% of all assets which unleashed hyperinflation in 1923.

In Herbert Hoover’s memoirs (1951), he documents the fact that Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR) played a very dirty game of politics. There were rumors that FDR would confiscate gold in 1932 BEFORE the election. These rumors spread and people ran to banks to withdraw their funds. The night before the election in 1932, FDR denied that he would do such a thing. After FDR won the election, the real bank panic began. FDR would not take office until March 1933.

The run on banks began as the Great Depression started. In 1929 alone, 659 banks closed their doors due to mismanagement and speculation. Ironically, to save money on paper, it was also in 1929 when the currency was reduced in size to save money. This time, they want to move to digital and save 100% on printing money. Here in 2023, the failures are due to the WOKE agenda which has deprived the banks of risk management rather than speculation.

However, as the 1931 Sovereign Debt Crisis hit, the number of bank failures skyrocketed. Goldman Sacks and others were selling foreign bonds to Americans in small denominations., As Europe began to default, US banks holding foreign debt and individuals in need of cash led to a banking panic for external reasons. Here is a chart showing the listing of bonds on the NYSE. We can easily see the collapse in the bond market thanks to the 1931 Sovereign Debt Crisis.

By 1932, an additional 5,102 banks went out of business. Families lost their life savings overnight. Thirty-eight states had adopted restrictions on withdrawals in an effort to forestall the panic. By March 4th, 41 states had declared a bank holiday shutting down banks. Bank failures increased in 1933, and Franklin Roosevelt deemed remedying these failing financial institutions his first priority after being inaugurated.

However, it was actually the election of FDR that started the banking crisis post-1931. Hoover pleaded with FDR to please come out and address the gold confiscation rumors. People had been hoarding their gold coins fearing the rumored confiscation. Despite Hoover’s plea for FDR to come out and deny the rumors after the election, he remained silent. Given FDR’s manipulation of Japan and the attack on Pearl Harbor which he appeared to instigate with sanctions confiscating Japanese assets in the USA, denying the sale of any energy to Japan, and then threatening to use the fleet to block them from buying fuel from anywhere else, They Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor. There were Senate investigations afterward about FDR’s role because the US had already broken the Japanese code and knew in advance about the attack on Pearl Harbor. He did that to force the US into World War II.

It was in his character to remain silent and create the worst banking crisis in history before he was sworn in as president. FDR was a radical socialist and many viewed that he admired Lenin. If it were not for Mr. Jones exposing the truth behind Stalin, even the corrupt New York Times journalist promoting Stalinism was meeting with FDR. The run on the banks became massive when FDR won the election on November 8th, 1932. FDR allowed the banking system to implode with people rushing to withdraw the money in gold coins.

At 1:00 a.m. on Monday, March 6th, 1933, President Roosevelt issued Proclamation 2039 ordering the suspension of all banking transactions, effective immediately. Roosevelt had taken the oath of office only thirty-six hours earlier.

The terms of the presidential proclamation specified:

[N]o such banking institution or branch shall pay out, export, earmark, or permit the withdrawal or transfer in any manner or by any device whatsoever, of any gold or silver coin or bullion or currency or take any other action which might facilitate the hoarding thereof; nor shall any such banking institution or branch pay out deposits, make loans or discounts, deal in foreign exchange, transfer credits from the United States to any place abroad, or transact any other banking business whatsoever.

For an entire week, Americans would not have access to banks or banking services. They could not withdraw or transfer their money, nor could they make deposits. The entire economy ran simply on cash in your pocket.

While the first phase of the banking crisis unfolded after 1929 due to speculation losses (hence Glass–Steagall Act), then the second phase was the 1931 Sovereign Debt Crisis, it was the third phase with the election of FDR that led to thousands of banks failing as there was a mad rush to withdraw your gold coin. But a new round of problems that began in early 1933 placed a severe strain on New York banks, many of which held balances for banks in other parts of the country. About 4,000 banks failed during this period alone bringing the total to over 9,000.

Much to everyone’s relief, when the institutions that could reopen for business on March 13th, 1933 saw depositors standing in line to return their stashed cash to neighborhood banks. Within two weeks, Americans had redeposited more than half of the currency that they had withdrawn post-FDR’s election on November 8th, 1932. This would prove to be a sneaky trick of FDR to get people to redeposit all the gold coins they had withdrawn – as we are about to explore.

The stock market was also ordered closed when FDR came to power. With the cleverness of a real con artist operating a Ponzi Scheme to gain the confidence of the people, FDR needed the gold coin to be deposited for Phase 4 of the banking crisis. On March 15th, 1933, (The Ides of March), the stock market was allowed to reopen. On the first day of trading, the New York Stock Exchange recorded the largest one-day percentage price increase ever.

The week before the closure, the Dow Jones Industrials fell to 49.68. The week following the closure, the Dow rallied to 64.56 – a percentage gain of virtually 30% over the banking holiday. The shorts who were better on the collapse of the market once it reopened were devastated. It was a major short-covering rally.

With the benefit of hindsight, the nationwide Bank Holiday and the Emergency Banking Act of March 1933, ended the bank runs that had plagued the Great Depression, but it also set the stage for the confiscation of gold. What you have to understand is that Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s (FDR) actions in 1933 were not directed simply at gold. He was embarking on what he called the New Deal, which was a Marxist Agenda that was very popular at the time. His New Deal would end austerity, whereby they were maintaining a balanced budget in the belief that they needed to inspire confidence in the currency.

It was this balanced budget philosophy that also inspired John Maynard Keynes who argued that in times of economic distress when the demand has collapsed, that is when the state needs to run a deficit and increase the money supply. There was a simultaneous international flight of capital from Europe to the United States in the face of European sovereign debt defaults. That capital flight lasted for nearly two years until FDR won the election in 1932. There was much concern that Roosevelt would do what Germany did in 1922 in confiscating assets. That was the rumor about the possible confiscation of gold.

Milton Friedman criticized the Fed because the capital flows poured into the US but they refused to monetize it. We can see that as Europe defaulted on its debts in 1931, the capital rushed head-first into the dollar. Then we see that the dollar peaked in November 1932 with the election of FDR fearing that would weaken the dollar and exploit the economy. All this gold came to the USA pushing the dollar higher, but the Fed refused to monetize it, was Milton’s criticism. The backing of gold behind the dollar doubled in supply between 1929 and 1931.

So, you must separate gold and the devaluation of the dollar to comprehend what the issue was all about. FDR could have simply abandoned the gold standard, as did Britain, and not confiscated gold. However, that would have also been sufficient to end austerity. But the bankers would have profited and sold the gold overseas at higher prices. Roosevelt in his confiscation of gold was intended to deprive the private sector of profiting from his devaluation of the dollar which was rising the price of gold from $20 to $35. You must keep in mind that he even degraded Pierre du Pont (1870-1954) and called him the “Merchant of Death” because he produced arms for World War I and made a profit off of that war demand. Many saw Roosevelt as a traitor to his own class.

ExecutiveOrder-Gold-ConfiscationThe confiscation of the gold was for two reasons. First, FDR was changing the monetary system from one where there was no distinction domestically from internationally to a two-tier system. Gold would freely circulate without restriction only internationally. Therefore, the confiscation of gold was altering the monetary system moving to a two-tier monetary system with gold only used in international transactions.

Consequently, FDR confiscated gold to move to a two-tier system and to deprive Americans of any profit from his devaluation. What FDR then did was confiscate gold from all institutions ordering them to turn over whatever they had. Ironically, this move was intended to target bankers rather than the public. FDR did not have people knocking on every door demanding all their gold. That is why there are plenty of US gold coins that have survived. If individuals possessed them rather than an institution, then they kept what they owned

Therefore, Roosevelt was able to seize whatever gold existed in banks. He declared all contracts void that had gold provisions for payment. It was in Perry v. United States – 294 U.S. 330 (1935) that the US Supreme Court ruled that Congress, by virtue of its power to deal with gold coin as a medium of exchange, was authorized to prohibit its export and limit its use in foreign exchange. Hence, the restraint thus imposed upon holders of gold coins was incidental to their ownership of it, and gave them no cause of action. id/P. 294 U. S. 356.

The Supreme Court held that it could not say that the exercise of this power by Congress was arbitrary or capricious. id/P. 294 U. S. 356. They held that even if the Government’s repudiation of the gold clause in the government bonds was unconstitutional, it did not entitle the plaintiff to recover more than the loss he has actually suffered, and of which he may rightfully complain. id/P. 294 U. S. 354. Therefore, the Joint Resolution of June 5, 1933, held:

“insofar as it undertakes to nullify such gold clauses in obligations of the United States and provides that such obligations shall be discharged by payment, dollar for dollar, in any coin or currency which at the time of payment is legal tender for public and private debts, is unconstitutional.” id/P. 294 U. S. 349.

Yet, swapping gold for dollars created no loss that was cognizable even though the taking of gold was unconstitutional. Clearly, the Supreme Court did not consider the loss in terms of foreign exchange. The Court reasoned:

“Plaintiff has not attempted to show that, in relation to buying power, he has sustained any loss; on the contrary, in view of the adjustment of the internal economy to the single measure of value as established by the legislation of the Congress, and the universal availability and use throughout the country of the legal tender currency in meeting all engagements, the payment to the plaintiff of the amount which he demands would appear to constitute not a recoupment of loss in any proper sense, but an unjustified enrichment.”

In my understanding of the law, those who argued before the Court made purely a domestic argument. A dollar was still a dollar in domestic terms so there was no cognizable loss and the Court did not reach the constitutional question. Had they argued that their loss was with respect to some debt owed in British pounds, they there was a loss. Purely domestically, the only loss would have been to inflation and the Court would never rule against the government on such an issue.

All of that said, there does not appear to be any historical precedent for the stock market to collapse by 50%, all tangible assets to turn to dust, and only gold will survive given a banking crisis where Biden and Yellen sit on each other’s hands and do nothing. Trust me. Every major Democratic donor will be screaming. And as for those claiming the Fed will reverse its position, say inflation is suddenly no longer a problem, and monetize everything in sight, this is even too big for the Fed. have to create QE and absorb all the debt, there to things have changed. If the Fed does that, it will also lose all credibility. It squarely understands that inflation comes from handing Ukraine a black check to the most corrupt government in the world. The Fed raised rates yesterday for it cannot back down. It is choreographing the best it can but the bankers do not listen.

If they simply stand behind all the deposits, then there will be no panic. That is what they did in 1933 and the market rallied in confidence thereafter.”

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/banking-crisis/the-1933-bank-holiday-can-it-happen-again/?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=RSS

Another St Trinian’s Film on CH 92 (GEM) now……………………………….

Between Grampian Nazis and Tranny Dreaming is anybody doing any governing? We await the sweet meteor of death or international capital markets, whichever comes first.

Captain Cook was greeted by trans flags. The Aboriginal flag came later, around 1810.

The Great Captain Cook was not welcomed at all. So much to ‘Welcome to Country;

Senior neo-Nazi slips out of Australia to fight Russian army

Here’s hoping he gets vapourised.

“Between Grampian Nazis and Tranny Dreaming is anybody doing any governing?”

Be careful what you wish for.

Be careful what you wish for.

If I’m paying for this I at least expect them to look as if somebody is in charge.

” I’ve long said that methanol would be a far better choice if the climate cabal were serious, since it can be centrally synthesized and fits into the existing fuel logistical system nearly seamlessly.”

No, (m)ethanol is crap as a transportation fuel.

Better to synthesize propane because:

* (m)ethanol is hydrophilic, and getting rid of water contamination is much more difficult for (m)ethanol than petrol;
* (m)ethanol destroys rubber-based engine seals, hoses etc that petrol and propane do not;
* propane (LPG) is already about half the price of petrol (about 60% in terms of cost/km – you do use a little more) and we have more than we can use in this country (we export plenty);
* we already have anaerobic bacteria that can turn organic waste into propane, so we can even solve our sewerage disposal issues as well as use other organic waste (kitchen and garden waste etc), rather than turn “food” (corn, sugar etc) into (m)ethanol;
* until we become fully “sustainable”, we can use “mined” propane/butane (as at present) while we are “rolling out” the change;
* infrastructure, including vehicle delivery (pumps at service stations), transport, storage etc etc, is already mature, widely available and very, very safe;
* other than the tank and fuel delivery system, no engine mods needed;
* near identical performance with existing petrol engines;
* can be run as “dual fuel” (both petrol and propane tanks/fuel delivery, switch between as desired/required);
* near identical range on propane (more range if dual fuel!) vs about a quarter of the range for the same volume of (m)ethanol (compared to petrol);
* propane never “goes off” – it can sit in the tank unused for years, and still be perfectly fine;
* propane burns cleaner than any liquid fuel, because it is a gas when it burns.

A conservative estimate suggests that at least a billion people would perish in such a conflict and nobody would win. Who would do such a thing? The idea of using nuclear weapons is, in fact, so repugnant that we can be assured that our leaders will never chose the path of escalation.

Surely, nobody’s that evil, are they?

Watch this space………………………..

2 things will flow from the screech;

Three things will flow from the screech – The High Court will be tied up for months in legal dogfights over how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.

https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/the-constitution/2023/03/the-most-insidious-defect-in-the-voices-dna/

Another highly relevant article, from Quadrant. Who is an Aborigine?

Daily Mail.

Inside Bruce Lehrmann’s ‘hit list’ as court hears why he was ‘always going to sue Lisa Wilkinson’ after THAT interview with Brittany Higgins

Lawyer says Mr Lehrmann was ‘always’ going to sue Lisa Wilkinson
Said he was ‘happy’ to settle with other news outlets
Ex-staffer is also suing news.com.au and Samantha Maiden

JMH says:
March 23, 2023 at 5:50 pm
I announced here quite some time ago that I would never watch Markson on Sky again. I have held fast to that statement.

She’s finished. Done like a dinner when angry Kezza has in for a “Skyer”.

Does anyone recall?

About a month or so or more, Twitter was awash with reports that a well known figure had been accused of rape (again) and was fronting a Queensland magistrate for a preliminary hearing. The suggestion was that it was Bruce L.

Whatever happened with that as it’s gone silent since then?