What is a woman?


If I told you in 2012 (I did) that the definitional games that liberals played with ‘marriage’ then would also be applied in areas that were as yet not controversial, like sex, I would have been called a ‘swivel-eyed loon’ (I was). A mere decade later, a nominee to SCOTUS believes that only a biologist can define or recognize what is a ‘woman’.


Subscribe
Notify of
guest

49 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Zipster
Zipster
March 23, 2022 2:07 pm

what are her pronouns? maybe she is a man? what’s with the dreadlocks? is it appropriate for a high court judge to look like a rastafarian dope head?

Cassie of Sydney
March 23, 2022 2:13 pm

“What is a woman?”

It is quite simple….

A woman is an adult human female.

Transwomen are not women.

calli
calli
March 23, 2022 2:15 pm

Q: What is a bit of four by two?

A: Dunno. I’m not a carpenter.

Said no one ever.

Rossini
Rossini
March 23, 2022 2:15 pm

Do you sit or stand to pea!

Roger W
Roger W
March 23, 2022 2:15 pm

Well, interestingly, I assume she (and her fellow Democrats) would not actually accept a biological definition of what is a woman!
What a tangled web they weave..

calli
calli
March 23, 2022 2:17 pm

Good work, you Strong Feminist Women, you.

You have now been cancelled by men.

bemused
bemused
March 23, 2022 2:18 pm

Can we then not use the same (il)logic and ask questions such as, ‘What is a black person?’ If it requires a biologist to identify a man from a woman, would it not also require a biologist to identify a white person from a black person etc?

feelthebern
feelthebern
March 23, 2022 2:20 pm

If Jackson is confirmed (likely) I’m expected they’ll be on the lowest intellectual tier of the court with Kavanaugh & Sotomayor.

Cassie of Sydney
March 23, 2022 2:23 pm

I should also add that the fact that we have to ask this question shows just how far we have sunk.

“If I told you in 2012 (I did) that the definitional games that liberals played with ‘marriage’ then would also be applied in areas that were as yet not controversial, like sex, I would have been called a ‘swivel-eyed loon’ (I was). A mere decade later, a nominee to SCOTUS believes that only a biologist can define or recognize what is a ‘woman’.”

Yes, which is why I voted NO to SSM….because redefining marriage was just the tip of the iceberg.

Damon
Damon
March 23, 2022 2:43 pm

SEN. BLACKBURN: “Can you provide a definition of the word ‘woman’?”
JACKSON: “No, I can’t”
Then she’s unfit to sit on the Supreme Court.

Big_Nambas
Big_Nambas
March 23, 2022 2:52 pm

How did Joe Biden find someone dumber than him, must have been a difficult task.

Lee
Lee
March 23, 2022 3:08 pm

Yes, which is why I voted NO to SSM….because redefining marriage was just the tip of the iceberg.

Same here.
I remember those who argued that it would be just the start of the slippery slope were derided and mocked by leftists.
But it was, and the left keep moving on to further Marxist goals to destroy western civilisation and all decency.

Dot
Dot
March 23, 2022 3:09 pm

To answer your question:

Solomia (Mia) Maievska.

calli
calli
March 23, 2022 3:11 pm

She can’t be a purist progressive.

Correct answer – “I am. What do you identify as?”.

duncanm
duncanm
March 23, 2022 3:43 pm

Or Occam’s razor – she really is that ignorant of chromosomes.

Vicki
Vicki
March 23, 2022 3:46 pm

At the end of the day this furore has nothing to do with biology or “gender” as we have understood it.
It is about the search for any “minority” that these fools can’t confer “rights” to.

duncanm
duncanm
March 23, 2022 3:47 pm

why wasn’t the next question – “So why does Joe think he’s nominating a woman of colour?”

Boambee John
Boambee John
March 23, 2022 3:48 pm

Damonsays:
March 23, 2022 at 2:43 pm
SEN. BLACKBURN: “Can you provide a definition of the word ‘woman’?”
JACKSON: “No, I can’t”
Then she’s unfit to sit on the Supreme Court.

Ask her to define “abortion”. She will be tied up in semantic knots for days.

Shy Ted
Shy Ted
March 23, 2022 3:49 pm

This is a woman. She even pays the bill.

lotocoti
lotocoti
March 23, 2022 3:49 pm

The trick cyclists won’t be happy she thinks it’s a matter for biologists to decide.

Megan
Megan
March 23, 2022 4:35 pm

When you are that dumb you have no place in the Supreme Court. OTOH if you are that politicised you have to give a dumb answer you still have no place in the Supreme Court.

No question the cabal of dummies in charge are going to appoint her to the SC. Minority Quotas R Us.

Bruce of Newcastle
Bruce of Newcastle
March 23, 2022 5:15 pm

It’s a tiny bit ironic that the Dems for weeks have been falling over themselves to find a black woman for SCOTUS, only to choose someone who doesn’t know what a woman is.

WolfmanOz
March 23, 2022 5:21 pm

They asked her (I assume I can refer to her as a her) the wrong question . . . it should have been . . .

Can you provide a definition of the word wanker ?

Alastair McLachlan
Alastair McLachlan
March 23, 2022 5:22 pm

OMG we are all fcuked !

Bruce of Newcastle
Bruce of Newcastle
March 23, 2022 5:34 pm

Dover – It’d be fun to ask her questions about defining what black people are.

Is Clarence Thomas black? Is Rachael Dolezal black? Is Elizabeth Warren black?

Probably too beyond the, um, pale to do so, but it’d skewer the hypocrisy nicely.

Rabz
March 23, 2022 7:16 pm

It’s not even funny. Once confirmed there’s a high probability this mediocre moron will be there for decades.

If the US doesn’t disintegrate well before then, which is probably the more likely eventuality.

Riversutra
Riversutra
March 23, 2022 7:23 pm

What’s a woman?
A man who couldn’t succeed against men and thought ” hold on, I ‘ve got a idea!”.
See Admiral Rachel Levine; one of USA Todays Woman of the Year.
And don’t forget everyone’s favourite record breaking swimmer.
Anyway Ash Barty has retired and I have an idea! I just need to look up who is ranked 462 in mens Tennis and see if they need a manger with vision.

JC
JC
March 23, 2022 7:26 pm

What is a woman?

I think Jack Nicholson answered it best in, As Good As It Gets.

Think of a man and then take away reason and accountability.

duncanm
duncanm
March 23, 2022 7:39 pm

dover0beachsays:
March 23, 2022 at 5:16 pm
People need to recognize, SCOTUS nominee, Jackson, knows what a woman is, what her answers illustrates is that the Regime will not let her publicly acknowledge it. Stating plainly what a woman is is to risk political and social death.

it also confirms to the left that she’ll be willing to bend to any democrat/woke belief in her decisions.

That alone should disqualify her.

Roger
Roger
March 23, 2022 8:12 pm

If she doesn’t know what sex she is she’s not qualified to sit on the SCOTUS.

Judge Dredd
Judge Dredd
March 23, 2022 8:58 pm

Just wait until they start changing the definition of “child” and “adult”.
We all know it’s coming, as the slippery slope only ends in hell.

Figures
Figures
March 23, 2022 9:55 pm

How did Joe Biden find someone dumber than him, must have been a difficult task.

Well he’s found two.

Jackson and Kamala.

Zipster
Zipster
March 23, 2022 10:32 pm

rubbing your face in insanity is a pure marxist power play

Katzenjammer
Katzenjammer
March 23, 2022 11:44 pm

What is a woman?
I dunno.
Are you a woman.
I dunno.
Are you intelligent enough to be supreme court judge.
I dunno.

Dave of Gold Coast, Aust.
Dave of Gold Coast, Aust.
March 24, 2022 7:36 am

Best answer for a mindless Marxist is- a member of the human race who has two x chromosomes. People can change a lot of things with surgery, injections etc. but not chromosomes.

Fair Shake
Fair Shake
March 24, 2022 8:25 am

Alternately: Can you define porn?
No, but I know it when I see it.

Similarly bad movies, great art, vacuous prime ministers…

Kneel
Kneel
March 24, 2022 9:00 am

“Rossini says:
March 23, 2022 at 2:15 pm

Do you sit or stand to pea!”

I always sit to pee – doctor told me not to lift heavy weights.
Boom tish.

Kneel
Kneel
March 24, 2022 9:14 am

“…why I voted NO to SSM…”

Could have gotten the same by saying:

“The word ‘marriage’ relates to a religious event, hence we will leave this definition unchanged. However, for the purposes of all government interactions, we will now only ask if you have entered into a civil union, and all people who are listed as ‘married’ will automatically be defined as having so entered such a civil union, all government forms will henceforth be printed with ‘in a civil union’ instead of ‘married’, and any such existing forms will be deemed to show said wording for the purposes of any and all government interactions, including legal interactions.”

IOW, everyone is treated equally and plain English words with meanings known for centuries would not be redefined by the government. Simple. Easy. Cheap. Nondiscriminatory. Not particularly controversial, except for a noisy few with a bee in their bonnet. Win-win.

Sorry – too sensible I know. Sigh.

Kneel
Kneel
March 24, 2022 9:24 am

“If she doesn’t know what sex she is she’s not qualified to sit on the SCOTUS.”

Perhaps more concerning is the “logic” used to give a 3 month sentence to someone with kiddie porn, when the prosecutor asked for 24 months and the sentencing guidelines suggested 97 months minimum.
She apparently believes that because the internet allows people to find and download such images much more easily, the definition of what is “a lot” of such should be changed from what is written into statute law to what she, as the judge, deems is now “a lot”.
Does that mean that you get a longer sentence if you are stuck on 28.8k dial-up internet than if you have 100M broadband when having the same amount of such illegal porn?

Eric Johnson
Eric Johnson
March 24, 2022 10:06 am

Judge Dreddsays:
March 23, 2022 at 8:58 pm
Just wait until they start changing the definition of “child” and “adult”.
We all know it’s coming, as the slippery slope only ends in hell.

Setting up a 5-8 year old child to then make an adult choice has already decided our fate.

Frank
Frank
March 24, 2022 11:34 am

Stating plainly what a woman is is to risk political and social death.

If you can’t define what a woman is then by extension you can’t define what a man is. But if this is so then you can’t really talk sensibly about same sex attraction so that is the whole gay lobby under the bus. Similarly the patriarchy and the gender wage gap are out. No wonder she doesn’t want to touch it, too many sacred cows and useful cudgels depend upon the fluidity of definitions.

Simon Morgan
Simon Morgan
March 24, 2022 12:28 pm

I suppose we have to be grateful that at least she recognises that a biologist can determine what she is!
Now all we can hope is that she avails herself of one.

Kneel
Kneel
March 24, 2022 3:36 pm

“If you can’t define what a woman is then by extension you can’t define what a man is.”

If they are the same, and you can be either depending on your own view of what you “identify” as, then if you suffer “discrimination” the obvious solution is to “identify” as the other temporarily and then it’s all good. And if you can’t tell by appearances and all that matters is how you feel about it, then who can be upset if someone “misgenders” you?

MatrixTransform
March 25, 2022 8:00 am

rubbing your face in insanity is a pure marxist power play

bang on
their post-modern gimmick isn’t about you getting their pronouns correct,
it is more about putting you up to you neck in epistemic quicksand

Cassie of Sydney
March 25, 2022 8:07 am

“But if this is so then you can’t really talk sensibly about same sex attraction so that is the whole gay lobby under the bus.”

Yes…which is why many gay and lesbian women are waking up to this nonsense and seeking to distance themselves from this “Q” and “T” nonsense. There’s a new organisation in the UK (and here too) called LGB Alliance…note the missing letters.

Bruce of Newcastle
Bruce of Newcastle
March 25, 2022 12:18 pm

Best meme yet.

That one is going to be very hard to beat.

Nelson_Kidd-Players
Nelson_Kidd-Players
March 27, 2022 12:02 pm

When she catches up with that biologist, perhaps she can ask when life begins.

  1. Vic can’t upkeep it roads, probably the smallest network per head in Oz. From what I’v heard other Gov services…

49
0
Oh, you think that, do you? Care to put it on record?x
()
x