Some thoughts on mothers, drag queens, trans, groomers & grooming


Why are parents, and in particular mothers, taking their children to drag queen shows and drag queen story hours in public libraries? This phenomenon of provocative drag queens performing in front of children was unheard of as little as five years ago yet now, probably because we are living in the middle of a woke revolution, every day hear of more stories and we see more footage of mothers with children, even infants, attending highly sexualised shows and “cabaret” acts, where scantily clad males parody women by putting on “women face”, and where these same males in “women face” lewdly gyrate and thrust themselves sexually in front of young children. Why do parents willingly take their children to view such lewd acts? This question was asked by Rita Panahi on Outsiders this week. As an aside, methinks Rita is having some regrets voting yes to the SSM debate. I have no such regrets because I did not vote yes back in 2017, I voted no and the reasons why I voted no are on display every single day.

But back to the question, why do parents, particularly mothers, actively participate in this?  Until now, drag queens have only ever been considered adult entertainment so, I am curious as to why we are suddenly seeing this phenomenon emerge where a society permits and even encourages drag queens to dress up and perform before children in highly sexualised and provocative ways. Whilst not all drag queens are paedophiles, I find it odd that any self-respecting drag queen would want to perform such acts in front of children, and such a willingness to do so reeks, to me at least, of something far more sinister. It isn’t rocket science to see that exposing children to drag queen shows and having drag queens read stories to children is a manifestation of the whole transgender cult but there is also something more dangerous and insidious at play, it is a manifestation of queer ideology’s open intent to sexualise young children, to make children sexually accessible, and to legitimise minor attraction, aka paedophilia. I believe that the push for SSM was the Trojan Horse to mainstream queer deviancy and degeneracy. And it has worked a treat, because silly and naïve parents, mainly mothers, are so drenched in woke progressive ideology that they fail to see the obvious dangers, dangers that aren’t just lurking beneath the surface, they’re bubbling away for all to see.

Look closely at the video clips from the US that show the degenerate drag queen shows.  Note that when you do you will see that, apart from the homosexual men and the degenerate drag queens, you will usually only see children with their mothers at the shows. I don’t see many straight males. Where are the fathers? Well, I know where they are, they’re missing, gone, absent, AWOL. And it seems to me that the mothers who are taking children to such shows are doing so because they are so desperate to prove their loyalty to woke ideology, and to accumulate woke brownie points that they willingly expose their children, not just to questionable content but more disturbingly, to questionable people.  We know paedophiles groom children, but they are also adept at grooming parents, particularly mothers.

I wrote the following a few days ago on C.L.’s blog and I apologise to those who’ve read it already but I’m going to repeat what I wrote. I know some might find what I wrote contentious, but it is something I have thought a lot about lately and I have discussed this with female friends and family.

It is an indisputable fact that it is some parents, and particularly mothers, who place their children at physical, emotional and psychological risk. Sometimes this is accidental, sometimes deliberate. Some mothers do so because they are naive, some because of rank stupidity, and some are happy to endanger their children in order to adopt a particular lifestyle or be accepted into a particular cult or group. They fail or refuse to understand how certain people, certain lifestyles and certain practices are dangerous and will harm children emotionally, psychologically, and physically. We hear examples of this weekly, where a child has died or been murdered by a mother’s de facto or boyfriend, where a child has been sexually abused by a mother’s de facto or boyfriend or someone she has invited or allowed into the home. Years ago, I remember reading a story about a young child who went missing decades ago. Whilst it took many years for the truth to unravel, the child’s paedophile abductor was known to the mother. The mother had associated with some unsavoury people. Whilst she didn’t set out to deliberately endanger her child, there are tragic consequences when you associate with dubious and dangerous people, and you leave your child in the care of people who should not be near children. 

The sudden emergence of children attending drag queen shows and drag queen book readings in public libraries is a phenomenon that would vanish today if mothers stopped taking their children to such events. But too many mothers are now so indoctrinated into a progressive woke world view that they refuse to acknowledge the obvious dangers posed by some individuals, beliefs, and practices. In other words, they refuse to acknowledge the reality of deviancy. The mothers who are taking their children to these drag queen shows are wilfully ignoring these dangers to satisfy woke ideology, with the result that they are jeopardising the future psychological, emotional, and physical wellbeing of their children. No good mother takes a child to watch drag queens perform. But what is more worrying is how our society, if it is not at the stage where it actively celebrates and applauds such deviancy, is just happy to shrug its shoulders and says, “what harm can drag queens do”.  It is this rank stupidity and apathy in the face of such obvious deviancy and degeneracy that proves that it is no longer only children and parents who are being groomed, our whole culture is being groomed, and we are willing participants in modern day child sacrifice. If this doesn’t ring alarm bells, we are doomed.

, ,

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

107 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bourne1879
Bourne1879
March 6, 2023 12:08 pm

Another great article Cassie.

Roger
Roger
March 6, 2023 12:11 pm

Romans 1:18-25.

Annie
Annie
March 6, 2023 12:15 pm

An excellent article Cassie. It is a horrifying development; those poor children. What a degenerate, depraved society we are living in.

Katzenjammer
Katzenjammer
March 6, 2023 12:19 pm

Normalisation of abnormalities leads us into the absence of ability to discriminate between constructive and degenerate qualities.

Figures
Figures
March 6, 2023 12:30 pm

Love ya work Cassie.

Stevem
March 6, 2023 12:36 pm

If they want their children to see a man in drag they should go to a pantomime. The kids will see a play designed for children and fulfil the modern drag requirement.

Rod Stuart
Rod Stuart
March 6, 2023 12:36 pm

A super article cassie!
A review of Agenda 21 reveals:
a) The reason for the jabs is to depopulate
b) The reason for eating bugs is to terminate modern agriculture
c) The reason to electric vehicles and 15 minute cities is to severly restrict ventures into the hinteroland.
d) The reason for the drag shows is part of the termination of religions.
etc etc etc

Shy Ted
Shy Ted
March 6, 2023 12:38 pm

Why? It’s as easy as ABC. And I’ll bet NO-ONE is checking Working With Children clearances for these characters.

duncanm
duncanm
March 6, 2023 12:40 pm

‘love is love’ ya bigot!

/sarc

Good article Cassie – I also wonder WTF is going through these women’s minds (if anything).

duncanm
duncanm
March 6, 2023 12:47 pm

Shy Tedsays:
March 6, 2023 at 12:38 pm
.. I’ll bet NO-ONE is checking Working With Children clearances for these characters.

ooooh. That would be a very nice way to subvert these events. Request the WWC credentials of the performer.

Verify a WWCC

Examples of people you may need to verify:
…party entertainers.

Oh – and here’s an example of one who will sacrifice their child for this particular cult.

.. NSW Greens Councillor Kristyn Glanville, who attended the reading with her son ..

Min
Min
March 6, 2023 12:56 pm

I trained in deviances when training in sex therapy with Prof Joseph Lo piccolo . Back then we were taught always look for the second deviance .
Also must add then the male problem was PE now ED usually found in diabetics . Look at the stats for this these days .

rickw
rickw
March 6, 2023 1:05 pm

Well said Cassie!

Whilst not all drag queens are paedophiles,

Above however is probably not that accurate…..

lotocoti
lotocoti
March 6, 2023 1:22 pm

Ladbrokes are unable to accept any bets for how many will up on Mumsnet
blaming the haters when their child ends up a suicidal freemartin.

Old School Conservative
Old School Conservative
March 6, 2023 1:43 pm

I also wonder WTF is going through these women’s minds (if anything).

They have so little reasoning ability that they have been easily brainwashed by insidious messaging like this:
Join a special Drag Queen Story Time with Charisma Belle at Manly Library.
The Drag Queen Story Time will feature stories and songs celebrating family, love and being yourself. The Story Time will be followed by a creative craft for attendees to keep.

Suitable for children aged 3+

All ages family event. Children must be accompanied by an adult.

Bastards.

Christine
Christine
March 6, 2023 2:02 pm

I thought the women who took their children to these performances would be lesbian couples only, but that isn’t the case.
Barry Humphries was punished by the Melbourne crowd for condemning ‘transitioning’ as self-mutilation. However, he was a great fan of the Weimar Cabaret club scene, with its decadence that spilled over into Berlin cafe society. The indecency was remarked on by G. Tomasi di Lampedusa in the 1930s – it gave him a sense of doom (like Cassie of Sydney).
Barry Humphries’ enthralment was “a reaction to the terribly safe, hygienic suburban life of Australia in the 1950s “.
My parents considered the Fifties to be very good times

Lee
Lee
March 6, 2023 2:14 pm

I am sick of reading and hearing the expression “love is love.”

It is used to justify a multitude of sins and deviancies, even against children.

Damon
Damon
March 6, 2023 2:32 pm

A far cry from the puppet Punch and Judy performances I watched when on holidays at the beach. Very sad.

Tom
Tom
March 6, 2023 2:45 pm

I find it odd that any self-respecting drag queen would want to perform such acts in front of children…

Once upon a time – in the 20th century – drag queens were just f—-d up men with mummy/daddy issues, were harmless and were seen by the broader society as figures of fun the whole world could laugh at.

Those old queens are long gone, finally swept under the carpet by the 2017 gay marriage movement.

Their replacement drag queens are all male homosexual political activists implementing the next stage of the homosexual agenda after they won the gay marriage plebiscite – encouraging sexual confusion among children, primarily via the trans movement, to make them sexually available to adults.

This was always their agenda and they have admitted it for decades. Now that it’s actually happening, they can’t admit it because of the justified alarm that would cause among parents.

To the mothers who have allowed their children to attend drag shows, get them out of there! In legal terms, you are an accessory to child abuse.

WolfmanOz
March 6, 2023 3:32 pm

Great post Cassie . . . looks like it’s a weekly contribution now ! ! !

For the life of me I do not understand how any parent could let their young kids to be exposed to this.

Something is now very seriously wrong in our society.

Diogenes
Diogenes
March 6, 2023 3:42 pm

I had an interesting discussion with a couple of ladies in a staffroom in which I worked last year, and I think I got through.

The school counsellor had organised a drag queen as part of purple day. They asked why I was not wearing purple and why I said I was not going to go to the performance.

I first asked if it was OK for me to put on blackface & do a show using the Black and White minstrels schtick – (wide eyes, fake black accent etc), they said no, that is racist.

I then asked them to look for a definition of drag queen online … They found something like “A drag queen is a person, usually male, who uses drag clothing and makeup to imitate and often exaggerate female gender signifiers and gender roles for entertainment purposes.”(This was from that well know neo nazi site – Wikipedia)

I asked what is the difference between ‘blackface’ & ‘woface’? What is the difference between “lordy lordy lordy” (falling to my knees doing the jazz hands – wide eyes and fake accent) with, at this point I undid the top 3 buttons of my shirt , pushed my man boobs together to make a decolletage, am walking around rolling my arse, thrusting my boobs towards them out and simpering “We girls have to stick to together”.

“You might not be offended, but I am offended that women are reduced to a ridiculous stereotype, I know my wife is.”

They looked horrified as if the thought never occurred to them. I added I had every sympathy with (emphasis) genuine (emphasis) sexual dysphoria, but hold no truck with drag queens.

Bar Beach Swimmer
March 6, 2023 3:54 pm

Great post, Cassie.

Cassie:
I believe that the push for SSM was the Trojan Horse to mainstream queer deviancy and degeneracy. And it has worked a treat, because silly and naïve parents, mainly mothers, are so drenched in woke progressive ideology that they fail to see the obvious dangers, dangers that aren’t just lurking beneath the surface, they’re bubbling away for all to see.

Over the last 20 odd years there’s been a increasing interest among heterosexual females to go to or have hens nights with male stripping providing the entertainment, which to me seems to have started the idea of sexual performance in front of females, from young to old.

Yes, it’s not unheard of that women started throwing their panties at major male singing sensations from the ’70s onward, and groupies have existed for decades. But the idea that everyday women – seemingly, normal everyday women with husbands, families and children – attending social occasions where male strippers are the main attraction, I think has been the entry point for this “new” phenomenon.

Yes, there is a difference between adults and children. But the socialisation of sexual behaviour as entertainment could have been the initial catalyst, which introduced drag queen story time.

To that may be added the cultural inheritance of men dressing up as women in western plays, especially pantomime. For example, the wicked step-mother and her two daughters in Cinderella – which has always been accepted as benign. And, later, movies like Priscilla, Queen of the Desert.

With the legalisation of SS “marriage” these ideas have gone mainstream.

So, it’s been a slow, steady assault on what were once reasonable cultural sensibilities, which has de-coupled the idea of risk from paedophiles into what’s essentially become, with the addition of tulle and sparkles, a type of “commonplace of the performance.”

Bar Beach Swimmer
March 6, 2023 4:00 pm

And I’ll bet NO-ONE is checking Working With Children clearances for these characters.

That would amount to discrimination in today’s woke-world.

calli
calli
March 6, 2023 4:52 pm

I find it odd that any self-respecting drag queen would want to perform such acts in front of children…

It bestows another level of legitimacy.

One of the last bastions of civilisation is the need to protect children from harm. Up until now, this was a “given” and much…much legislation and agitation and reform revolved around this in the 19th century and beyond. Think of child labour in mills, mines, homes and workhouses.

This is, apart from the white anting of the Church, the BIG ONE. And it is no surprise that they go hand in hand (see American Conservative and the post on the Drag Hour in the church at Piccadilly, London).

Lone mothers are all that stands between the depraved and their little ones, and they are being co-opted by their own addiction – to social media.

So what to do? As mentioned up thread, anyone in contact with children in this country must have a WWC certification. Make a complaint citing a fear that the people involved do not have such certification and that children may be in danger. Play the creeps at their own game. The police must investigate, no matter what.

calli
calli
March 6, 2023 4:56 pm

There is no negotiation on WWC. Even I have to have one as a group leader and I’m the youngest there! It encompasses any situation where an institution works with people who may be influenced.

In this case a library and children attending.

thefrollickingmole
thefrollickingmole
March 6, 2023 5:02 pm

Its on par with otherwise sensible ladies “dating” tinder randos with facial tatts and ACAB tattooed on their knuckles whos handle online is “Pigdog rooter54” and their sexual interests as “everything”.

Then wonder why they wake up 3 weeks later with a sore arse, no money in the bank account and a drug habit.

As for the kid

Dot
Dot
March 6, 2023 5:31 pm

Let me tell you the real reason why.

It has nothing to do with gay marriage or hen’s parties. Plenty of gays are “TERFs” or “worse” and a hen’s party does go to a point I make later, but in an inverse manner.

This is an extension of a female prerogative to kill their child in utero. It’s their body, their genetic legacy, their choice. It is the same as the mothers who transition their kids at a young age, declaring “they were trans before they could speak!”. It has nothing to do with XXY or XYY chromosomal disorders etc.

It is why microchimerism is censored off the internet and scientific debates about the age of the mother at conception leading to ASD and other developmental disorders are bastardised into the age of both parents.

Which is also why RAPE is basically glorified in the media (Law and Order SVU has the cops break a ridiculous amount of laws and over 20+ years, is a rape fantasy) and why radical feminists deride all men as rapists, it is a deflection for the hundreds of thousands of abortions that are performed every year in Australia.

The female preference for supporting these bizarre events has more to do with the same reason why Japan defends whaling so strongly, it is an existential issue.

If I am wrong, why do even non religious women with “conservative” or pro life views find these events as the freak shows they are? Even quite a few drag Queens think having the shows in schools etc is really messed up.

I doubt you would find many if any pro life women, religious or not, supporting or attending.

Ultimately it is about shaming men into accepting abortion because men find it repulsive, which goes into hypergamy and other issues. If it’s not about shaming and conditioning men, then why is an emasculated man being glorified here? Do as we say and we will reward you.

Abortion is a much more important, reverberant and significant societal issue than two gays getting married by a government approved celebrant.

Aaron
Aaron
March 6, 2023 6:36 pm

Revenge.
After being derided forever, now they have acceptance they are taking the piss.

The women who attend?

Probably got a boy and wanted a girl.

ArthurB
ArthurB
March 6, 2023 6:48 pm

I agree about SSM being a Trojan horse for the Left in their relentless campaign to impose their agenda on the other 99.5% of society. I am sure that the Left has chosen to fight one campaign at a time, a while ago SSM emerged from nowhere to become something that had to be legislated, the subject was pushed ad nauseam by the GayBC and woke journalists. When the SSM battle was won, the next stage was the deification of transexuality, and now we have drag queens being allowed to visit primary schools — aided and abetted, as some of you have said, by airheaded mothers.

There is a common theme to these campaigns: the great unwashed have to be persuaded that perversions and fringe activities are, really, normal, and anyone who disagrees is immediately labelled as a homophobe, transphobe etc. It is a sign of the times that our Prime Minister can find time to attend Pride rallies.

As some of you have said, the next battle will be to glorify paedophilia. What rough beast, its hour come round at last, will slouch towards us bearing the next stage of the agenda?

Bar Beach Swimmer
March 6, 2023 7:56 pm

It is why microchimerism is censored off the internet

I just searched it and found a wiki page:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microchimerism

why is an *emasculated man being glorified here?

because they’re part of the lgbtiq+ crowd. They self-identify within that group as a transgender. Indeed, the whole gamut is being glorified.

*but used as a figurative description – that is a choice each individual makes. Some men are manly – alpha males; others are beta males and some are just wimps.

Dot, on most subjects your arguments are clear and concise. But this comment is not among your best contributions.

Dot
Dot
March 6, 2023 8:11 pm

No.

Microchimerism is lied about and the truth of the matter is quarantined, deleted or duck shoved down in searches.

Now go to the telegony page on wiki. It is a ball of lies. It isn’t “superstitious” or a crackpot theory. It is an inconvenient theory, backed up by empirical data.

Are we to believe that microchimerism only works one way, despite the evidence? It is inconvenient to feminism.

I don’t give an old children’s encyclopedia (Britannica) much credence, even if it was internally fact checked (the reference wiki uses to “discredit” telegony).

Here are some papers on the matter:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0079610722000682

Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology
Volume 174, October 2022, Pages 55-61
Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology
Uterosomes: The lost ring of telegony?

Abstract

Telegony refers to the appearance of some characteristics of the female’s previously mated male in her subsequent offspring by another male. According to evidence, telegony may occur either through the infiltration of sperm into the somatic tissues of the female genital tract or the presence of fetal genes in the mother’s blood. It is highlighted that sperm penetrates into the mucosa of the uterine and possibly alters the genetic structure, affecting the embryo and enduring from one pregnancy to the next, which may be one of the potential mechanisms of telegony. Uterine fluid, uterine gland-derived histotroph, supplies key nutrients for successful embryo implantation and it is important during the first trimester, especially, because of its susceptibility to maternal states. The presence of EVs in uterine fluid (uterosomes) was reported in mice, sheep, and humans, including a wide range of biomolecules, such as proteins, and non-coding RNAs. In this review article, we presented a new idea to explain telegony. Based on our idea, after the previous male sperm entry into the female reproductive system, those sperm which do not participate in fertilization penetrate into the somatic cells of the uterus and store their genetic/epigenetic information there. The sperm of the next partner reaches a location in the female reproductive canal where it exchanges information with the uterosomes and obtains the proteins and non-coding RNAs required for fertilization, development, and implantation.

The next two are links only for brevity.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4282758/

Ecol Lett. 2014 Dec; 17(12): 1545–1552.
Published online 2014 Sep 30. doi: 10.1111/ele.12373
PMCID: PMC4282758
PMID: 25270393
Revisiting telegony: offspring inherit an acquired characteristic of their mother’s previous mate

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23618818/

Gene
2013 Jul 25;524(2):414-6.
doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.03.061. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
Fetal genes in mother’s blood: a novel mechanism for telegony?

They self-identify within that group as a transgender.

Most gay people couldn’t care less about trans stuff, let alone this truly weird stuff.

London to a brick some of the SSM advocates back in the plebiscite here in Australia would be unpersoned by cannibalistic Scottish tranny absolutists.

Dot
Dot
March 6, 2023 8:15 pm

Cassie of Sydney says:
March 6, 2023 at 8:00 pm

“Dot, on most subjects your arguments are clear and concise. But this comment is not among your best contributions.”

Correct BBS. However Dot is a libertarian, and libertarianism, morally, is all over the shop. I wonder what the libertarian response will be to the push for legalised paedophilia?

Libertarianism not only has several complete and cogent competing theories of morals and rights, they are the best arguments for child protection.

I forgive your ignorance, but it is mind blowing.

Dot
Dot
March 6, 2023 8:21 pm

Mind blowing ignorance.

Dot
Dot
March 6, 2023 8:31 pm

Pathetic.

I have been nothing but polite, if not controversial.

You CHOSE to be nasty, invidious, personal and grubby.

Here is the boiler plate, please read it before you snidely insinuate others with different political beliefs are child abusers.

https://www.libertarianism.org/topics/children

Briefly:

“Classical liberal thinkers of the 17th and 18th centuries, among them John Locke and John Stuart Mill, challenged the standard view, inherited from Roman law, that children were the rightful property of parents. This view also marked a major shift from the religious teachings of earlier Christianity regarding the proper functions of a family and the appropriate upbringing of children. Children, in Locke’s view, were not to be thought of as chattels—things to be owned—but rather as future persons who would develop toward full personhood and responsibility. Children in the Lockean sense are divine gifts, and as such they exact certain moral obligations from the parents. John Stuart Mill’s On Liberty takes parental obligation a step further and argues for an important exception to the idea that the state is only justified in interfering with individuals to prevent harm to others. When Mill discusses the practical application of this principle, he considers the possibility that society may be justified in intervening in a family when there are concerns about child abuse or a failure to educate the child. Mill’s is a significant and rarely discussed exception to the classic defense of individual freedom, an exception that has widespread implications for child welfare laws and public education.

Notions of equality and pluralism discussed in the context of the family do not appear in these early liberal writings. Mill does not apply his idea of “experiments in living” or the marketplace of ideas to family life. Nor do we find the notion of a “contract” suggested when dealing with the family, otherwise a central idea used to justify political and social institutions in Locke and other classical liberal thinkers. There appear good reasons for this absence because the idea of a contract seems strained when applied to the rich and complicated relationships within a family, particularly the obligations between parents and children. Pediatrician and philosopher Lainie Ross has suggested that we view the complex interrelationships within a family as one of “balancing interests.” Among these are (a) parent-?serving interests, (b) child-?serving interests, and (c) family-?serving interests. There is no need to rely on a conception of rights because each of these interests is of equal moral standing and must be balanced against one another. This model captures the idea that family members are tied to each other in ways that members of a business or political community are not. Human beings are relational beings, and, as such, their autonomy, especially within a family, has its limits. These relationships are not ones of equality. Instead, we find even in the classical liberal tradition the notions of stewardship, development, and protection.”

I hope you can be more polite in the future.

Old Goat
Old Goat
March 6, 2023 9:19 pm

Dot,
While I have “libertarian” leanings I also realise there has to be limits . The issue is where the limits are . I think that if you want to have bits of yourself removed or altered that’s nobodies business but yours . However there is no operation that I know of that can turn a functioning male into a functioning female and vice versa . Drag queens can “sexually appropriate” the female gender and that’s OK but if they were in blackface its verboten . Social media has taken advantage of the need for approval and twisted reality has now become normalised in the rush to be popular. Being popular on social media is like sitting at the cool table at the insane asylum.

Bruce
Bruce
March 6, 2023 9:30 pm
Dot
Dot
March 6, 2023 9:31 pm

However there is no operation that I know of that can turn a functioning male into a functioning female and vice versa .

???

I have never asserted otherwise, why do I need to be told this? You’re right.

Drag queens can “sexually appropriate” the female gender and that’s OK but if they were in blackface its verboten

I think they are emasculating themselves in response to decades of anti male propaganda. Almost like how some darker people would lighten their skin.

Now of course, we have to see drag Queens doing black face. That’s where NEETs on 4Chan come in handy. Remember they started that #free bleeding stunt?

Katy Perry had to apologise for cultural appropriation. What about a drag Queen Geisha?

Some of this goes down to fundamentally nice progressives don’t want to be or be seen as mean people. It cruels their own sense of self and their fortitude.

Dot
Dot
March 6, 2023 9:36 pm

Cassie of Sydney says:
March 6, 2023 at 8:41 pm

“You CHOSE to be nasty, invidious, personal and grubby.”

Ahh I see, a woman who has an opinion is “nasty, invidious, personal and grubby”.

No, not at all.

“Chose” is past tense and a one time thing. Feigning ignorance of Locke, Mill etc was particularly grating to observe for a cheap shot that could be seen from the moon.

Entropy
Entropy
March 7, 2023 8:03 am

Mothers take their children to this kind of thing for their own entertainment. At many levels. For good or ill. Much cheaper and acceptable than going to an actual drag show.
And as a bonus, as this article points out, for positioning in the female hierarchy.

MatrixTransform
March 7, 2023 9:04 am

the mothers don’t think anything
actually, they can’t
they’ve had their brains scrambled with post-modern gibberish

and their kiddies are just meat in a Derrida/Foucault sandwich

Somebody writing about Foucault:
Foucault challenges the idea that power is wielded by people or groups by way of ‘episodic’ or ‘sovereign’ acts of domination or coercion, seeing it instead as dispersed and pervasive. ‘Power is everywhere’ and ‘comes from everywhere’ so in this sense is neither an agency nor a structure (Foucault 1998: 63). Instead it is a kind of ‘metapower’ or ‘regime of truth’ that pervades society, and which is in constant flux and negotiation. Foucault uses the term ‘power/knowledge’ to signify that power is constituted through accepted forms of knowledge, scientific understanding and ‘truth’:

Somebody writing about Derrida:
Deconstruction is generally presented via an analysis of specific texts. It seeks to expose, and then to subvert, the various binary oppositions that undergird our dominant ways of thinking—presence/absence, speech/writing, and so forth.

Shy Ted
Shy Ted
March 7, 2023 10:19 am

I wonder what payments and expenses are involved. None, I hope.

Fast Bowler
Fast Bowler
March 7, 2023 10:40 am

An excellent question “Why are parents, and in particular mothers, taking their children to drag queen shows and drag queen story hours in public libraries?”

To be honest buggered if I know!
In three generations since those born 100 years ago (our parents), married, went to war, made our world safe, taught us how to live with high standards and morals then passed away, we are witnessing the absolute decimation of the very world we have lived through. We can’t stop it, just as the Romans couldn’t stop their decimation. As I say to my mates every week when we meet for the Old Farts Drinking Club “we are the first generation ever in which it is better to be old than young”. How sad is that?

Roger W
Roger W
March 7, 2023 10:41 am

Cassie, you seem to make the point that, more generally, wokeness is supported especially by women, especially young women. That also seems to describe the vast majority of people who attend Climate Change protests etc. 70% of young women apparently voted Democrat in the recent mid-terms in the USA.
Are females more inclined than males, as a generality, to seek approval from others? This is perhaps exaggerated massively by social media?
Is there a reason why, until very recently, women were controlled in all societies, and in many societies still today? In the past, young women were particularly controlled by older women. Did they recognise that young women in particular have a tendency to behave in ways that are not helpful to either themselves or society as a whole?
Young men, of course, also do incredibly stupid things but perhaps things that are more personally destructive and relatively less destructive of society as a whole? We do lock up young men much more readily than young women, who inevitably have the most influence over children.

Fast Bowler
Fast Bowler
March 7, 2023 11:10 am

“For the Age has itself become vulgar, and most people have no idea to what extent they are themselves tainted. The bad manners of all parliaments, the general tendency to connive at a rather shady business transaction if it promises to bring in money without work, jazz and Negro dances as the spiritual outlet in all circles of society, women painted like prostitutes, the efforts of writers to win popularity by ridiculing in their novels and plays the correctness of well-bred people, and the bad taste shown even by the nobility and old princely families in throwing off every kind of social restraint and time-honoured custom: all of these go to prove that it is now the vulgar mob that gives the tone.”
? Oswald Spengler

Written around 100 years ago.

tommbell
tommbell
March 7, 2023 11:20 am

Young white women walked off the reservation ages ago. Sure, plenty of men swept up too, but think , in no particular order – climate change, need for lockdowns, CRT, the Voice, white patriarchy, joys of socialism etc etc. That they think some bloke swinging his junk in front of kids is ok is not surprising.

Christine
Christine
March 7, 2023 11:35 am

Oliver Goldsmith, 1766
on his book
“The hero of this piece unites in himself the three greatest characters upon earth; he is a priest, a husbandman and the father of a family…. In this age of opulence and refinement, whom can such a character please? …. such as mistake ribaldry for humour will find no wit …. and such as have been taught to deride religion will laugh at one, whose chief stores of comfort are drawn from futurity”

Big_Nambas
Big_Nambas
March 7, 2023 11:35 am

If this doesn’t ring alarm bells, we are doomed.

I have stated on this blog many times, we are doomed, it is too late to turn back. Our generation allowed the Marxists to take over our education systems and now they will inherit the world.

Boambee John
Boambee John
March 7, 2023 1:19 pm

Big_Nambassays:
March 7, 2023 at 11:35 am
If this doesn’t ring alarm bells, we are doomed.

I have stated on this blog many times, we are doomed, it is too late to turn back. Our generation allowed the Marxists to take over our education systems and now they will inherit the world.

They might inherit the world, but probably for not much more than around 50 years, by when the contradictions will have become too obvious to be ignored.

See also: Union, Soviet.

Rococo Liberal
Rococo Liberal
March 7, 2023 2:32 pm

There is a common theme to these campaigns: the great unwashed have to be persuaded that perversions and fringe activities are, really, normal, and anyone who disagrees is immediately labelled as a homophobe, transphobe etc.

I think you have hit the nail on the head. Ther is a common theme, but there is no grand plan. The left just needs a challencge. It will pivot to attack anything bourgeois that it can , even whe its own deznes live impeccably bougeois lves themselves. In fact that is the real problem, these people need to seem hip and cool, even though they are as boring and bland as a beige rug on a beige carpet. They have lostGod and have lost purpose. They have to keep sponsoring outrages and challenging normality, because they have no core to their own lives.

Kneel
Kneel
March 7, 2023 3:46 pm

“I had an interesting discussion with a couple of ladies in a staffroom in which I worked last year, and I think I got through. “

You could also ask them if pole dancing is appropriate entertainment for children. If not, what is the difference?

Kneel
Kneel
March 7, 2023 4:08 pm

“I have stated on this blog many times, we are doomed, it is too late to turn back.”

“An enemy is only defeated when he believes he is defeated.”

It will probably get worse before it gets better, but get better it will – indeed, the worse it gets, the more forcefully and further the pendulum will swing in the other direction.

m0nty
m0nty
March 7, 2023 6:04 pm

What a load of rubbish. A classic case of moral panic manufactured out of nothing by grifters and spread by frightbats.

You lot are only turning on trans people because you were soundly beaten on SSM. First it was blacks, then it was Jews, then it was women, then it was gays, now it is trans people. You will lose this fight against liberty as well.

MatrixTransform
March 7, 2023 6:50 pm

moral panic manufactured out of nothing

what a vapid wanker

mUnty, your entire pose is ‘manufactured out of nothing’

Lee
Lee
March 7, 2023 7:02 pm

You will lose this fight against liberty as well.

The sexual exploitation of children by drag queens and nearly naked male performers is a “liberty” that the left think is a hill worth dying on?

No moral compass at all.

Boambee John
Boambee John
March 7, 2023 7:58 pm

Cassie

Last time that I looked at Phat Pussy, the comments were all from m0nty=fa himself, Steve from Brisbane and Homer/Trampis. No-one else was recorded in Recent Comments.

Not exactly scintillating conversation.

Boambee John
Boambee John
March 7, 2023 7:59 pm

The contributions could be best summed up as “m0nty=fa and his ilk.”

m0nty
m0nty
March 7, 2023 8:37 pm

The question of why cishet mothers take their kids to drag shows is simply answered. These are normal people doing normal things. You lot are the weirdos for arcing up about it.

You don’t get much more normal than a mother of a young child. They are by definition the backbone of the nation, raising the next generation. If they think it’s okay to go to a drag show with their kid, it is you who should re-examine your beliefs, not them.

JC
JC
March 7, 2023 8:40 pm

Monst, you’re just blatantly biased since you now identify as a fat lesbian.

Lee
Lee
March 7, 2023 8:52 pm

“The question of why cishet mothers take their kids to drag shows is simply answered. These are normal people doing normal things. You lot are the weirdos for arcing up about it.

Yes, it’s perfectly “normal” for sexually confused (at best) men to dress up in drag and ridiculous makeup to get close to young children.

But we decent people are supposed to be the “weirdos.”

Dot
Dot
March 7, 2023 8:56 pm

m0nty says:
March 7, 2023 at 8:37 pm

The question of why cishet mothers take their kids to drag shows is simply answered. These are normal people doing normal things. You lot are the weirdos for arcing up about it.

Jesus Christ you stupid wanker.

Lee
Lee
March 7, 2023 9:12 pm

Last time that I looked at Phat Pussy, the comments were all from m0nty=fa himself, Steve from Brisbane and Homer/Trampis.

That would be Steve from Brisbane who (on C.L.’s blog last year) defended Biden’s showering with his then teenage daughter as being proper.

Boambee John
Boambee John
March 7, 2023 9:31 pm

Leesays:
March 7, 2023 at 9:12 pm
Last time that I looked at Phat Pussy, the comments were all from m0nty=fa himself, Steve from Brisbane and Homer/Trampis.

That would be Steve from Brisbane who (on C.L.’s blog last year) defended Biden’s showering with his then teenage daughter as being proper.

Hmmmm. Is m0nty=fa getting his Drag Queen talking points from Steve from Brisbane? The stupid following the idiot?

MatrixTransform
March 7, 2023 10:39 pm

These are normal people doing normal things

careful what you wish for

Bruce in WA
March 7, 2023 11:06 pm

They play the long game. Sadly, we play the short game.

If they can convince this generation of young kids that it’s “normal”, then subsequent generations looking back will only see “normalcy”. And what we now see as deviant is suddenly mainstream and, what’s worse, “acceptable”, because those before them accepted it.

m0nty
m0nty
March 8, 2023 8:06 am

Yes, it’s perfectly “normal” for sexually confused (at best) men to dress up in drag and ridiculous makeup to get close to young children.

But we decent people are supposed to be the “weirdos.”

Pantomime shows in England have featured drag for centuries. This is not a new thing. I don’t remember the Widow Twanky ever being accused of grooming kids.

Your moral panic is laughable.

calli
calli
March 8, 2023 8:17 am

Widow Twanky in a G-string twerking at the boys and girls?

I don’t think so.

m0nty
m0nty
March 8, 2023 8:21 am

The Poms have been taking their kids to pantos including drag performers from time immemorial. Was there a massive conduit of groomed youth in England as a result? No.

You lot love talking up western culture, and that culture includes a very long history of drag performances for children. It is harmless fun, this has been proven since before Victorian times.

Stop shrieking like frightbats.

MatrixTransform
March 8, 2023 8:27 am

if the Widow Twanky ever tried grooming kids,

“she” would have been fed to the pigs

calli
calli
March 8, 2023 8:32 am

The Poms have been taking their kids to pantos including drag performers from time immemorial.

Quite so. If you call “drag” guys they know are guys dressed as the “ugly sisters” in Cinderella. They’ll sometimes show a glimpse of pantaloons as the crinoline sways and they try on the glass slipper, much to the young audience’s delight. Will it fit? Nooooo it won’t!

You know all this m0nty, yet still you persist in the silliness and false equivalence. Man up, be a dad and say it’s wrong to expose littlies to men dressed in g-strings flaunting their bare bottoms and fake breasts and being overtly sexual in front of them.

But you won’t because the herd is more important than children’s innocence. Perhaps even your own children’s. I shudder though to think that last is true.

MatrixTransform
March 8, 2023 8:36 am

It is harmless fun

thing is
normal people don’t like groomers around their kids
and they certainly don’t like relativistic posturing wankers around them either

next kiddie’s birthday you do down the park
you tell that to all the other dads
loud and proud
make sure you let them know that they’re just “shrieking like frightbats”
report back on how you went.

m0nty
m0nty
March 8, 2023 8:52 am

You know all this m0nty, yet still you persist in the silliness and false equivalence. Man up, be a dad and say it’s wrong to expose littlies to men dressed in g-strings flaunting their bare bottoms and fake breasts and being overtly sexual in front of them.

Cassie was right to identify the mothers who attend these shows as being the authority here. They would tell you to stop being so ridiculous.

If you think children are so brittle as to be turned to a life of debauchery by a drag performer waving their bum, you don’t have much faith in Western values to begin with.

m0nty
m0nty
March 8, 2023 8:59 am

You are telling these mothers that they are bad parents, that they would not be able to educate their kids about who drag performers are when the inevitable questions start.

They would tell you to rack off. And they would be right. It’s none of your business.

Christine
Christine
March 8, 2023 9:04 am

Western “values”.
What are they now

Boambee John
Boambee John
March 8, 2023 9:07 am

m0ntysays:
March 8, 2023 at 8:06 am
Yes, it’s perfectly “normal” for sexually confused (at best) men to dress up in drag and ridiculous makeup to get close to young children.

But we decent people are supposed to be the “weirdos.”

Pantomime shows in England have featured drag for centuries. This is not a new thing. I don’t remember the Widow Twanky ever being accused of grooming kids.

Your moral panic is laughable.

LOL. If you are (as you clearly are) too stupid to see the difference between the Widow Twanky playing a fussy old woman and a highly sexualised performance in front of very young children by a semi-naked man, then you are as perverted as the drag queen performer.

Your supposedly “moral” defence of these performances is laughable.

calli
calli
March 8, 2023 9:11 am

The mothers can do whatever they please, however distasteful, within the law. I would also call them a “bad” parent if they gave their child Coca Cola in a sippy cup or left them in a hot pram on the footpath to go shopping, or allowed them to be cruel to pets or other children.

And if I objected, of course such a “parent” would tell me to bugger off because busybody. I would still be right, but my approach would be wrong. There might be other avenues to explore, like an invitation to playgroup or the like.

One point is that these events are taking place in venues provided by rate/taxpayers. In other words, they are given the stamp of approval by government entities and therefore by extension…all of us.

The other is a moral/ethical one, which also skims around the law – these are children, and sexual grooming of children is forbidden (see WWC certification).

m0nty
m0nty
March 8, 2023 9:12 am

Have there been any actual cases in the centuries old history of drag performances for children of an actual grooming? Or is that merely a product of your fevered imaginations.

This is on a par with Reefer Madness as an absurd moral panic.

Anders
Anders
March 8, 2023 9:19 am

Would mUnty and the left be fine if it was priests in g-strings dancing in a sexually suggestive manner in front of young children? Can’t see any problem there, totally acceptable behaviour!

calli
calli
March 8, 2023 9:23 am

More false equivalence.

Here’s a panto dame story from 2013.

Panto Dame – Old and Busted
Drag Queen Story Hour – New Hotness

…….Oh no it isn’t!…..

MatrixTransform
March 8, 2023 10:42 am

centuries old history of drag performances for children

… a western tradition heh?

like the fairy tale where in the end, the prince commands the preening old Queen to wear a pair of red-hot iron slippers and to dance in them until she’s dead ?

mUnty, not everybody is as stupid nor facile as you are

your idiotic stand-point only works on a forum
not so much IRL

Dot
Dot
March 8, 2023 10:46 am

This is on a par with Reefer Madness as an absurd moral panic.

No.

Just stop.

Boambee John
Boambee John
March 8, 2023 11:12 am

m0ntysays:
March 8, 2023 at 9:12 am
Have there been any actual cases in the centuries old history of drag performances for children of an actual grooming? Or is that merely a product of your fevered imaginations.

It’s hard to believe, but m0nty=fa is actually as stupid as he seems.

He is too thick (or too politically motivated) to be able to tell the difference between fully dressed men playing fussy old women, without attempting to claim to be actual women, and almost naked men simulating sex acts while pretending to be actual women.

The Beer whisperer
The Beer whisperer
March 8, 2023 12:14 pm

You know it’s an ideology because people don’t normally conflate live-and-let-live with equivalence of all lifestyles.

And typically, the oppressed take with both hands the opportunity to become the oppressor.

MatrixTransform
March 8, 2023 12:18 pm

as stupid as he seems

it seems to escape him
that using relativistic gibber to argue for a brand new absolute
is utterly retarded

Viva
Viva
March 8, 2023 1:46 pm

My late mother used to throw a bucket of water over humping dogs, told a visting evangelist he was charlatan to his face over a guesthouse breakfast table and asked “what’s so glorious about the dead” when walking past the Martin Place cenetaph.

Heaven only knows what would have happened if she had turned up to one of these drag queen story times.

MatrixTransform
March 8, 2023 9:23 pm
Seco
Seco
March 8, 2023 9:37 pm

Hey, where can I find CL’s blog?

Seco
Seco
March 8, 2023 9:41 pm

“what harm can drag queens do”

This attitude infuriates me, whether it’s “Welcome to Country” ceremonies, Pride week shit etc. It is worse than a cancer to society.

Pyrmonter
March 9, 2023 11:46 am

Until now, drag queens have only ever been considered adult entertainment …

Google ‘Hinge and Bracket’. Saturday night family viewing on the ABC in the late 1970s packaged into the ‘Good Old Days’. Innocent at the level of children; much more so than many of its contemporaries. It is silly; twee even; and somewhat misogynist; but hardly the stuff to outrage public morals.

Lee
Lee
March 9, 2023 12:14 pm

Hey, where can I find CL’s blog?

https://thecurrencylad.com/

Dot
Dot
March 9, 2023 2:29 pm

Google ‘Hinge and Bracket’. Saturday night family viewing on the ABC in the late 1970s packaged into the ‘Good Old Days’. Innocent at the level of children; much more so than many of its contemporaries. It is silly; twee even; and somewhat misogynist; but hardly the stuff to outrage public morals.

I get the point but it isn’t the same really.

Why do mad lefty librarians INSIST on Drag Time Story Hour?

Who takes their kids to a drag show?

Seco
Seco
March 9, 2023 5:08 pm

Lee says:
March 9, 2023 at 12:14 pm
Hey, where can I find CL’s blog?
https://thecurrencylad.com/

Thanks Lee, much appreciated ?

Seco
Seco
March 9, 2023 5:08 pm

Lee says:
March 9, 2023 at 12:14 pm
Hey, where can I find CL’s blog?
https://thecurrencylad.com/

Thanks Lee, much appreciated ?

Lee
Lee
March 9, 2023 6:15 pm

You’re welcome, Seco.

Christine
Christine
March 9, 2023 6:33 pm

I guess there’s not much they can do to change their masculine voices, these men in make-up and women’s clothes. That’s something.
They sound ridiculous with their female voice mimics

Shy Ted
Shy Ted
March 9, 2023 6:39 pm
Christine
Christine
March 9, 2023 9:01 pm

Oh no

  1. Some images of the church attack by the muzzie including one of him smirking while being held down: BREAKING: Another…

  2. Precisely my point. The strike was significant In some ways the Israelis were too successful. Normally a Pearl Harbor style…

  3. 350 Iranian ballistics shot at Israel. I say 350 Israeli Air Force’s Python 5 missiles upon Iran’s head. “A pound…

  4. The problem with Australia visualised: No wonder rub and tug had to get his rocks off with the professionals. There’s…

107
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x