Open Thread – Thurs 6 Feb 2025


Portrait of Chaliapin, Konstantin Korovin, 1911

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

24 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sancho Panzer
Sancho Panzer
February 6, 2025 12:51 am

I really don’t care, Margaret.

Sancho Panzer
Sancho Panzer
February 6, 2025 1:09 am

Link on the old thread on USAID funding a UK organisation called the “Centre for Information Resilience” which claims to “fight misinformation”.
Our very own DFAT appears on the list of donors as well.
Here’s how the international gaslighting game works.

  • Penny and Luigi cut the cheque.
  • Luigi introduces a Misinformation Bill.
  • ABC gives a soft interview to Luigi on the Misinformation Bill for five minutes.
  • They then beat up on the Shadow Minister for two minutes.
  • In the interests of balance they give five minutes to Mr 11% Arse Bandit
  • As a closer … “We have on the line, Felicity Margaret-Karen from the independent Centre for Information Resilience in London …”
  • Felicity has the Liars talking points in front of her and assures us in a plummy Oxbridge accent that Luigi’s legislation is world class, totally balanced and reasonable and only garage Nazis would oppose it.
Muddy
Muddy
February 6, 2025 1:28 am
Reply to  Sancho Panzer

The RAND Corporation in the U.S. has been researching ‘Truth Decay’ for some years now, presumably at least partly taxpayer funded. All these drink-tanks (not sic) provide acadumbic (h/t Faye) legitimacy for the desired policy outcomes. Rule by ‘Spurts.

DrBeauGan
DrBeauGan
February 6, 2025 1:44 am
Reply to  Sancho Panzer

What thoroughly repulsive people they are. Not a touch of integrity between them all.

Mak Siccar
Mak Siccar
February 6, 2025 2:33 am

A very long but informative article. Excerpts follow.

Utterly beyond the comprehension of the malicious Pong and Airbus Elbow.

The growing advocacy of a fraudulent two state solution
?
Leslie Stein

In response to Israel adopting defensive measures in the wake of an unprovoked massacre undertaken by Hamas, a notion is gaining widespread international currency – that all would be well, if only the Palestinians were granted a state of their own. Supporters of such a view, be they individuals or nation states, generally look upon Israel as being responsible for the unfortunate lot of the Palestinians. That being the case, they maintain that the provision of statehood to the Palestinians is long overdue. The Palestinians would certainly welcome such a state provided they need not recognise the legitimacy of Israel and that they remain free to engage in an ongoing campaign to undermine and eventually destroy it.

Their obsessive desire to bring about the downfall of Israel is fuelled by two intermingling factors. One relates to their belief that Israel is uniquely responsible for their chronic statelessness. The other relates to their holding of an extreme, Nazi-like version of anti-Semitism. However, the historical records indicate that the current plight of the Palestinians is exclusively due to their outright rejections of proposals, submitted at various times, by Britain, the UN and Israel, all of which if adopted, would have facilitated the formation of an independent Palestinian State.

….

Maliciously turning a blind eye to the true nature of the Palestinian leadership in both in Gaza and the West Bank, the United Nations General Assembly, on December 3, 2024, called upon Israel to fully withdraw from both Gaza and the West Bank as a prelude to the creation of an independent Palestinian State. To facilitate the formation of that putative state, an international conference is scheduled to convene in June, 2025, in New York. Nonetheless, given the current aspirations of the Palestinians, the chances of them accepting any statehood which obliges them to live peacefully side by side with Israel, is most implausible. For if truth be told, the Palestinians’ preference is for a one state solution, that is, a state located between the River Jordan and the Mediterranean devoid of Jews. Given the Palestinians’ insistence on securing such a state, those who wilfully or naively lend them support, are effectively accomplices in the undermining of Israel’s security.

Last edited 4 hours ago by Mak Siccar
Steve trickler
Steve trickler
February 6, 2025 3:34 am

Why the f*ck! is she allowing the legacy media hacks to dominate the press pack?

Tell them to f*ck off!….. Oh, I get it it. Let the enemy tie themselves up in knots.

Trump’s New Press Secretary SMACKS DOWN Woke NBC Reporter During Heated Deportation Debate

Last edited 3 hours ago by Steve Trickler
Tom
Tom
February 6, 2025 4:00 am
Tom
Tom
February 6, 2025 4:01 am
Tom
Tom
February 6, 2025 4:02 am
Tom
Tom
February 6, 2025 4:03 am
Tom
Tom
February 6, 2025 4:04 am
Tom
Tom
February 6, 2025 4:05 am
Tom
Tom
February 6, 2025 4:06 am
Tom
Tom
February 6, 2025 4:07 am
Tom
Tom
February 6, 2025 4:08 am
Tom
Tom
February 6, 2025 4:08 am
Tom
Tom
February 6, 2025 4:09 am
Tom
Tom
February 6, 2025 4:10 am
Black Ball
Black Ball
February 6, 2025 4:56 am

Mmm I see. Hun:

ABC managing director David Anderson said claims “Australia is a racist country” is based in “fact” as he told a court other high-profile journalists haven’t been pulled from air for making “impartial statements” on “contentious” issues similar to Antoinette Lattouf.

Ms Lattouf’s high-profile trial returned to the Federal Court for a third day on Wednesday, with the ABC opening its case after she sued the national broadcaster claiming unfair dismissal.

Ms Lattouf launched legal action after she was sent home for the final two days of a five-day fill-in stint on ABC Radio’s Sydney Mornings program in December 2023.

She is suing under the Fair Work Act and has claimed her sacking was motivated by complaints made during a campaign by the “pro-Israel lobby” because of her political beliefs and social media posts on the Gaza war.

She claimed she was unlawfully sacked after sharing a post on Instagram by Human Rights Watch reading “HRW reporting starvation as a tool of war”.

“The Israeli government is using starvation of civilians as a weapon of war in Gaza,” the post also read.

Mr Anderson told the court that he said there was a “step missing” in Ms Lattouf being taken off air, saying with hindsight she should have been provided with a right of reply.

He told the court that a manager, ABC chief content officer Christopher Oliver-Taylor, made the decision because Ms Lattouf had disobeyed a direction not to post to social media about the war several days earlier.

He was then asked by Mr Fagir about whether he considered a series of statements “contentious”.

“Do you regard this as an impartial statement ‘Australia is a racist country’,” Ms Lattouf’s barrister Oshie Fagir asked.

“I have no problem with that statement, because it is based in fact that we have a history of racism,” Mr Anderson told the court.

“Do you say it is an impartial statement: ‘Australia is a racist country’,” Mr Fagir asked.

“It is an impartial statement based in fact,” Mr Anderson said.

“You say ‘Australia is a racist country’ is an impartial statement,” Mr Fagir said.

“Based in fact. I don’t know how you can deny racism in this country,” Mr Anderson replied.

He said there was “further evidence” there was “racism in this country”.

His questions were directed towards statements made by ABC political reporter Laura Tingle at a writer’s festival that Australia was a “racist country”.

Mr Anderson said that Ms Tingle had not been taken off air but was sanctioned for other statements about opposition leader Peter Dutton.

“Ms Tingle’s statements soon after that were problematic, but that statement was not what I had a problem with,” Mr Anderson said.

He was later asked by Mr Fagir: “Can you tell me this – do you regard the making of the statement that ‘Australia is a racist country and always has been’ as conduct which is capable of reasonably being perceived as not to be impartial?”

“It could be perceived that way, yes,” Mr Anderson replied.

ABC barrister Ian Neil SC told the court on Monday that Mr Anderson was concerned about “impartiality and perceptions of impartiality” when he personally inspected Ms Lattouf’s social media accounts.

Mr Anderson was also asked about a tweet by former Media Watch presenter Paul Barry who said: “Israel is killing journalists again.”

“No I didn’t know that actually,” Mr Anderson replied.

“No one told you that?” Mr Fagir asked.

“I do not recall anyone telling me that,” Mr Anderson said.

“You haven’t spent an evening reviewing Paul Barry’s tweets?” Mr Fagir asked.

“No I haven’t,” Mr Anderson said.

Mr Anderson told the court that Mr Barry was neither taken off air nor sanctioned.

He said the statement could be perceived to be “impartial”.

There’s more to this sordid tale but I must away. Needless to say, what a shitshow.

Miltonf
Miltonf
February 6, 2025 6:20 am
Reply to  Black Ball

Lord I hate the ABC.

Beertruk
February 6, 2025 5:45 am

Today’s Tele:

LATTOUF WAS THE ABC’S DEI HIRE

MATTHEW BENNS
6 Feb 2025

The ABC hired fill-in radio presenter Antoinette Lattouf partly because her Lebanese-Christian heritage fitted the national broadcaster’s diversity policy.

Lattouf’s unfair dismissal case in the Federal Court heard how a string of complaints about her appearance on ABC Radio Sydney mornings sparked a flurry of emails among the upper echelons of the broadcaster questioning how she was hired.

ABC Radio Sydney manager Steve Ahern told the broadcaster’s managing director David Anderson: “Her background is Lebanese-Christian. She grew up in western Sydney, the child of Lebanese immigrants. She’d been selected in part having regard to the ABC’s diversity policy”.

ABC bosses investigated Lattouf’s social media posts on Israel and Gaza after a string of complaints were received hours into the first of five on-air shifts on ABC Mornings in December 2023.

ABC barrister, Ian Neil SC, said the managers decided to keep her on air but told her not to post on the conflict during her week-long stint. Lattouf has already told the court she “challenged” that request if an event such as the death of a journalist occurred.

Mr Anderson did his own deep dive into Lattouf’s social media posts that night and messaged bosses to say we have an “Antoinette problem” because her posts were filled with “anti-Semitic hatred”.

“Not sure we can have someone on air that suggests that Hamas should return to their ethnic cleansing in Gaza and move on to the West Bank. It’s a reputational issue … the perception of our peoples’ impartiality is as important as their adherence to the policy,” he explained.

However, Mr Neil said closer examination of the posts by acting editorial director Simon Melkman showed they were meant to be a humorous take-down of her critics and she was allowed to stay on air.

The next day Lattouf shared a Human Rights Watch report on “starvation as a tool of war” and was later told to collect her things and not to finish her final two days of her $2900 contract. She was paid in full.

Mr Anderson appeared before the court yesterday to say that, with hindsight, he felt it had been a mistep to send Lattouf home without consulting the HR department, but that the outcome may well have been the same anyway.

Lattouf’s lawyer, Oshie Fagir, put to Mr Anderson a string of contentious public statements by prominent ABC journalists, including Laura Tingle, that did not result in them being sanctioned or taken off air.

Asked about Ms Tingle’s statement that Australia is a racist country, Mr Anderson said it was not an impartial statement because it was based in fact.

“I don’t know how you can deny racism in this country,’’ he said.

Ahhh…so DEI, not competence is the ABCcess hiring policy.
I am shocked…SHOCKED I tell youse!!!

MatrixTransform
February 6, 2025 5:50 am

Who’s Afraid Of Jonathan Turley? ChatGPT, For One

AI has potential to free humans from tedious mental tasks, opening up our time and mental resources for more creative work. 

Already, more than half of Americans say they use AI regularly. 

On the downside, there is a strong negative correlation between AI use and critical thinking skills. 

The risk inherent in such “cognitive offloading” is that we might allow our critical thinking skills to atrophy – making us even more susceptible to AI lies.

“As individuals increasingly offload cognitive tasks to AI tools, their ability to critically evaluate information, discern biases, and engage in reflective reasoning diminishes,” says Professor Michael Gerlich, a leading researcher on AI and human cognition.

feelthebern
feelthebern
February 6, 2025 6:20 am

The Oz has an article on Woodside’s CEO “warning both side of politics that cheap reliable energy is needed blah blah blah..”

Why are they warning both side of politics.
There’s enough coal in the federal LNP’s plans to bring down energy costs.
There’s only one side that is all in on renewables at a federal level.

Such a brave CEO that’s too chicken shit to say it like it really is.

feelthebern
feelthebern
February 6, 2025 6:37 am

Back in 2021 when it was being put together, a lot of genuine commentators (the Greenwald, Taibbi universe) were surprised with just how much of a lightweight cabinet the Biden administration were made up of.
Apart from Yellen, Rice (who pulled the pin) and Samantha Power (who headed up USAID).
The rest were viewed as a B-team even in Democrat cycles.

I had zero idea how important USAID was to funding the DNC machine domestically, so no wonder they had to trust it to one of Obama’s closet and most trusted allies.

Says a lot when the two most competent people in the Biden administration were in charge of Treasury & USAID.

  1. Wishing her all the best. Incredibly hard work and she will need all the help she can get. Hint -…

  2. Back in 2021 when it was being put together, a lot of genuine commentators (the Greenwald, Taibbi universe) were surprised…

  3. Their view is landlords should provide housing for free. In fact ideally government owns and controls rental properties.

  4. The Oz has an article on Woodside’s CEO “warning both side of politics that cheap reliable energy is needed blah…

24
0
Oh, you think that, do you? Care to put it on record?x
()
x