Reduce immigration, Not eliminate it, but reduce the numbers.

And prioritise carpenters and bricklayers, not dogwalkers and beauticians.

For heaven’s sake!

This is how they operate.

@catturd2

The Left has swatted me 3 times trying to kill me, I get death threats all the time, they’ve cut the heads off rabbits and thrown them over my fence, they’ve called animal control on me and lied about me abusing my animals that I love and have saved, they lie about me running over Smiles – and every major leftist news organization has written hit piece after hit piece calling me every name in the book, which is all Lies – and Wikipedia lies about me with every word.

The funny thing is – they think they can break an old country boy like me with their lies.

LMAO – Talk to the paw. I haven’t yet begun to fight.

TRUMP 2024 — LET’S GO !!!

The reason the invisible hand is invisible is because it doesn’t exist. Wages are already not keeping up with cost of living and your proposal will make that worse.

It’s impossible for there to be real increases in wages without corresponding increases in productivity. Increases in nominal wages simply fuels inflation.

It’s why real wages in Australia were stagnant and now begun to fall.

Have a good night, Cats.

Cold & wet here.

Wood heater taking the edge off it!

The best and most frequent way to increase productivity is reduce labour costs.

Thats not the measure of productivity.

@Bitcoin_Redneck

I’d like to thank Congress for using my Tax money to buy Zelensky’s wife a Bugatti.

Zelensky’s wife purchased the newest Bugatti Turbillon for 4.5 million euros.

During the official visit of the Ukrainian delegation to Paris in early June, especially for the Zelensky couple, Bugatti Automobiles, together with the Paris dealership, organized a pre-premiere display of the new Bugatti Turbillon hypercar (the public premiere took place two weeks later, on June 20). According to a dealer representative, Zelenskaya was delighted with the new car and placed a pre-order, thus becoming the buyer of the first of 250 cars planned for production.

French journalists were able to obtain a copy of the invoice for Zelenskaya’s new car. To the base price of almost 4 million euros, almost 500,000 euros worth of options were added. Zelenskaya will receive her car in 2026.

Catchy little number from North Korea. Please include in Saturday radio show.

https://youtu.be/bj2_py2Ab3k

cohenite
 July 2, 2024 5:46 pm

Justice Sotomayor is an evil, stupid kunt; she has literally unleashed the hounds of the demorats with her hypothetical scenarios about Trump using SEAL teams to assassinate his rivals.

One of the more bizarre “judgements” I have ever heard.
The Dimocrats are losing what remains of their tiny little minds.

JC
 July 2, 2024 7:19 pm

Indolent

That story is bullshit. The invoice had a BSB number. French banks don’t use BSB numbers. You need to be more discerning with these conspiracies.

Ya think?

The best line in the history of debates has to be

“I really don’t know what he said at the end of that sentence. I don’t think he knows what he said either,”

‘Can’t stick at a job’, judge tells top legal agentEllie Dudley
4 hours ago.
Updated 1 hour ago

The head of Australia’s largest Aboriginal legal service has been condemned by a judge for failing to hold down a job, sparking fresh criticism of his appointment, and raising serious concerns about his competence.
North Australian Aboriginal Justice Agency chair Hugh Woodbury has faced growing calls to step down after The Australian revealed he bashed his pregnant partner by standing on her stomach, pushing her to the ground, slamming her arm in a door and calling her a “c..t” in front of their two-year-old child.
Coalition MPs have also raised questions over whether Mr Woodbury, who handles about $30m in federal government funding a year despite having no official legal qualifications, has the appropriate background to restore the embattled organisation after it was last year forced to suspend services in Alice Springs due to a staff exodus.
In sentencing remarks during Mr Woodbury’s abuse proceedings, Northern Territory local court judge Greg Borchers described Mr Woodbury as “someone who doesn’t stick at jobs”.
“I am not sure how I am to consider that you have had so many jobs, but you have never stayed at one,” Judge Borchers said when sentencing Mr Woodbury in ­October 2020.
“You come to this courthouse, as you have, Mr Woodbury, ­almost each and every legal practitioner in this court house has one job, as a legal practitioner. You have had so many jobs and you have never stuck with any, apart from a long period of time with Parks and Wildlife.”

Before working at NAAJA he had spent time managing Aboriginal hostels, working as a fencing contractor, labouring, work­ing in a bank, and held positions within the Federal Circuit and Family Court and the Central Australian Aboriginal Legal Aid Service.
“I don’t know why, but that’s a record of someone who doesn’t stick at jobs,” Judge Borchers said.
Mr Woodbury was fined $200 and sentenced to a 12-month good behaviour bond. No conviction was recorded.
The sentencing remarks ­revealed Judge Borchers was hesitant to convict Mr Woodbury ­because “a conviction in itself is a serious sanction and it does have an effect upon people’s futures”.
“I do accept that you may, at some stage, wish to consider ­entering a legal course,” he said.
He also did not convict Mr Woodbury “because of the attitude to your wife, who says that you are very supportive of her”.
“You are a good father and that you need some help,” he said.
South Australian Liberal senator Kerrynne Liddle criticised the appointment of Mr Woodbury, and said there was an issue within community-controlled organisations where senior management are appointed because of their heritage.

Sack some people, automate, increased productivity for the remaining staff.

Productivity isn’t about sacking people; it’s about getting more output by reducing the cost/time of inputs. It could mean sacking people at the micro level, but then it may not. If it meant sacking people, the rate of unemployment would have been close to 99% since the Industrial Revolution. But, as you appreciate, it hasn’t meant that at all. In fact, productivity actually complements employment elsewhere in the economy.
 
 

The increased productivity theme ignores the reality that productivity enhancement is limited in some domains.

 
 
Sure. Absolutely. However, productivity enhancement, if it’s wide enough, will impact all incomes and not just the ones at the center of innovation. Think of something as simple as hair cuts. To a large extent, productivity increases in hair cutting have barely nudged. It’s done with scissors, as it was 300 years ago. But a barber’s wage isn’t the same as it was 300 years ago. That’s because productivity improvements in the industrial economy have enabled barbers to be paid at continually higher rates.

I’ll give you another example. When AI was first introduced, the CEO of Microsoft cam out and said AI’s impact on his firm would see large numbers of people being let go. About a year or so later, he took that back and completely reversed his view. He suggested that while there would be displacement, demand for workers could actually increase because Microsoft would be able to afford to have workers explore areas that needed more focus while AI did its thing. In fact, he added that AI would actually cause demand for more workers. He’s basically summarizing what’s been going on since the Industrial Revolution.

I wouldn’t have to lie awake solving the problems of Brit politics if my freakin’ blood glucose would behave.
Grrr.