In But Of Course news, Hun:

Indigenous cultural conservation claims have been targeted at 30 mining and pipeline projects but just two renewables proposals since 2012, an investigation reveals.

A full list of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Heritage Protection Act applications during that time also shows many individual resources developments have been hit with multiple objections.

And, according to the records obtained by this masthead using freedom of information (FOI) laws, some complaints are withdrawn only to be strategically reactivated at a later date.

In total there have been more than 40 applications against proposals to extract gold, coal and other deposits; there has been one opposing wind turbines and one protesting a solar farm.

Shadow Environment Minister Jonathon Duniam said: “It is curious that these claims are heavily distorted towards stopping mining projects whereas renewables projects like wind farms and solar projects, that take up swathes of space, are mostly untouched.”

The resources industry argues the heritage protection system has been hijacked and no longer works properly – for Indigenous Australians or project proponents.

Association of Mining and Exploration Companies (AMEC) CEO Warren Pearce said the Albanese government was “changing the way” heritage protection decisions were made.

“It’s sending a shockwave through the mining industry and also investors,” Mr Pearce said.

Certainty had “gone out the window” since Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek made a heritage protection declaration in August against Regis Resources’ $5 billion McPhillamys gold project near Orange in NSW, he said.

The project had state and federal approval but was sent back to the drawing board because Ms Plibersek found a proposed tailings dam would damage an area of cultural importance in the blue-banded bee dreaming story.

The Orange Local Aboriginal Land Council and NSW Aboriginal Land Council did not support the heritage protection application, made by a single Wiradjuri elder.

Mr Pearce said the McPhillamys decision “really surprised people because they (Regis) had done everything they were supposed to”.

Regis has said it will take up to 10 years to identify and gain approval for an alternative tailings site. The company has filed proceedings in the Federal Court seeking a ruling that Ms Plibersek’s order was “legally invalid”. It wants the decision redetermined by a different minister.

Minerals Council of Australia CEO Tania Constable said that through the McPhillamys decision, the federal government had undermined investor confidence.

“Heritage protection laws have increasingly been weaponised by activist groups, often funded by taxpayers, to delay or block mining projects,” she said.

“This is not what these laws were designed for.”

Among the applications covered in the FOI document release was one by the Environmental Defenders Office “on behalf of” six elders against a Santos gas pipeline slated to run to the west of the Tiwi Islands.

The application was withdrawn in February this year, in a move Ms Plibersek’s office said was not related to the dismissal – in a scathing judgment a month earlier – of a Federal Court case brought by the EDO on behalf of Tiwi elders over the pipeline.

While few heritage protection applications end up being granted, Mr Pearce said nearly all take more than a year to resolve.

Some resource project proponents are still waiting for decisions on applications lodged in 2021.

Funding can fall over during the wait, Mr Pearce claimed.

The government argued that a pending application did not delay or stop work.

Ms Plibersek’s spokeswoman also said the rate of new heritage protection applications “has halved under Labor”.

The documents released under FOI show that between 2012 and the middle of this year, there was one application against a renewables proposal – a failed bid to stop a Tasmanian wind project.

However, in July, Queensland’s Bigambul Native Title Aboriginal Corporation applied to protect an area near Goondiwindi from construction of the Gunsynd solar farm.

The existence of the application is being made public for the first time today.

This masthead repeatedly attempted to contact the corporation and the owners of the Gunsynd project, Singapore’s Metis Energy. Further detail of the application was requested from Ms Plibersek’s office but nothing was provided.

Comment on the trend within heritage applications was sought from the First Nations Heritage Protection Alliance.

Housing developments and government infrastructure projects are also the target of applications, but not in the same volume as resources projects.

So there you have it. Apparently the monuments to Gaia have no effect whatsoever on songlines and Crocodile Man or whatever else.
But if it’s the blue banded bee, on advice of some crazy cat lady, which elders of the area had never heard of, then it’s all over for the resource sector.
Audit every Aboriginal organisation and see what they got and from whom. Shut them down during the process and if any funds are from activist groups, Rabz the joint.
Intent on destroying Australia these bastards.

As I said, they are doing everything possible to block Trump.

Biden EPA Approves Waiver For California’s 2035 Gas-Powered Vehicle Ban

FMD. Look at this idiot. Sydney Morning Herald:

Australian Olympic breakdancer Rachael “Raygun” Gunn is demanding $10,000 in legal fees from the owner of a small Sydney comedy club that had planned to stage a show called Raygun the Musical.

The musical, written by comedian Stephanie Broadbridge and slated for December 7, was canned at the last minute after promoter Anthony Skinner was hit with a legal letter claiming the show infringed Gunn’s intellectual property.

Now it has been revealed that Gunn’s lawyers, Glebe-based 17 Degrees, are demanding at least $10,000 from Skinner in legal fees. He offered $500, which the law firm has “completely rejected”. All proceeds from the show were to go to a women’s shelter.

The letter (below) demanding the five-figure sum was accompanied by an email from 17 Degrees lawyer Samantha Ludemann, who signed off the message, “Warm regards, Samantha”.

The letter claims Gunn’s intellectual property includes her “story, personal history, Olympic videos and choreography”.

In an earlier message, Gunn’s lawyers said the dancer’s much-derided routine was “the culmination of over 10 years of training”.

“You will recognise this Olympic-level choreography is a complex sequence of moves and techniques of which our client is the creator and author,” it continued.

Judges at this year’s Paris Olympics awarded 37-year-old Gunn’s routine zero points.

Skinner said he was furious when he received the bill for $10,000.

“When they sent that $10,000 letter, I was like, ‘You’re f—ing joking’,” he said. “I’m thinking about studying law myself now!

“The average person has no idea about any of this stuff. It seems that they’re just sort of using that to their advantage and trying to get people to crumble. I think they think my comedy business is more successful than it is.”

Skinner said if he was forced to pay $10,000, it would come close to sending his business to the wall.

He will now wait to see what Gunn’s next move might be but, meanwhile, he wanted the issue publicised.

“People should know that this sort of bullshit’s going on – trying to take 10 grand out of a business whose whole purpose is just to support comedians.”

He added that any offers of legal assistance would be welcome.

“If anyone wants to help that would be great. Legal stuff’s not really our forte. We just make people laugh.”

Meanwhile, it appears Gunn’s claims may not rest on particularly solid legal ground. In an article first published in The Conversation and later in the Law Society Journal this week, authors Sarah Hook, Marie Hadley and Vicki Huang said it was unlikely Gunn would be “able to enforce intellectual property over her name, her persona, and her dance moves”.

“In Australia, there is no right of publicity, meaning a person’s likeness and name are open for others to use, adapt and parody,” they continue. “Broadbridge can call a character in her musical Raygun.”

However, the authors also point out that even legal threats that are not well-founded may be enough to stop artists like Broadbridge from taking risks.

On Friday, Gunn took to social media to defend closing down the show.

“People assumed that we had developed it, that we had approved it,” she said. “And it damaged many relationships, both personal and professional. That is why my management and legal team had to work so quickly to shut the musical down.

“It was really unfortunate that the show had to be cancelled so close to the launch. I know the artist would have put a lot of work into it, and that really sucks.”

Gunn also addressed the controversy that arose from her trademarking the kangaroo pose.

“In terms of the kangaroo dance, I did not trademark it or claim any trademark ownership of the kangaroo dance, and it in no way mimics Aboriginal dance,” she said.

“It was instead inspired by the Australian Olympic mascot, BK, the boxing kangaroo, and I wanted to represent and celebrate that spirit.

“I know that this misinformation about the kangaroo dance has upset many members of the Indigenous community, and I am sorry for that. I’m really sorry that it hasn’t been corrected sooner. I have the utmost respect for Indigenous Australians.”

“They also said I wasn’t allowed to do the dance because she owns the kangaroo dance,” she said. “That one did puzzle me. I mean, that’s the Olympic-level dance, how would I possibly be able to do that without any formal breakdancing training?”

Comment has been sought from Gunn.

I’m speechless. I’m without speech.

I have written to my, rather good, local member asking why attacking Labor’s blatent antisemitism is not a daily headline action for the SFL.

They would then face the question, “What do you intend to do about it when in power?”

That would mean, at the federal level, reviewing immigration from Muslim majority countries where antisemitism is a pillar of cultural identity and amending citizenship laws to allow the revoking of naturalisation where there has been a failure to assimilate as evidenced by engaging in antisemitic rhetoric or actions.

Would the Gliberals be up to that?

Slimy prick pesutto has to go. Credlin nails the mongrel, and the libs: key phrase: gutless liberals:

Principled or craven? Pesutto’s howlers leave little choice for Libs
Peta Credlin The Australian December 19, 2024

Imagine this. The chairman of a big bank impugns the integrity of a female director, she’s booted off the board but wins big in court after he’s found guilty of defamation. In what universe would the chairman survive calls from shareholders and regulators to apologise, make amends and, in all likelihood, resign? What if a conservative male politician told lies about a Labor woman, inflicting enormous reputational damage and, when his claims were finally found to be false, still refused to apologise?

The uproar from the #MeToo movement would be nuclear. But when the man is Victorian Liberal leader and moderate John Pesutto, and the woman is his conservative colleague Moira Deeming, there’s not a scintilla of contrition from Pesutto and dead silence from an outrage industry that’s otherwise on a hair trigger.

The Pesutto-Deeming case matters, not only as a modern morality play but also as an inflection point for a party at war with itself and a broken state desperate for change. It could all come to a head on Friday, in a special Liberal partyroom meeting called to discuss the case and its outcome – the same day as there’s an 11am Federal Court hearing that’s likely to rule Pesutto is liable for a multi-million-dollar costs order.

Already, donors have been approached to bail out Pesutto, with most unwilling to fund a loser’s case and focused instead on supporting the looming federal campaign. Which means if he can’t pay the millions and is bankrupted, Pesutto will be left ineligible to sit in the parliament.
Whatever way it goes, it’s clear this self-inflicted wound is a long way from being healed. If only Pesutto had accepted Deeming’s offer to settle this case for $100,000 plus minimal costs back in February, as letters between lawyers now show.

Instead, he has a verdict against him – and $300,000 in damages plus costs – that calls into question not only his character and judgment but also, as a lawyer, his professional acumen.

Last week judge David O’Callaghan found the Victorian Opposition Leader’s evidence had been “untruthful” and “evasive”. He found Pesutto had never regarded Deeming as an extremist or extremist sympathiser. And he found the real reason Pesutto wanted her out of the partyroom was a fear that premier Daniel Andrews would weaponise the fact the women’s rights rally attended by Deeming had been gatecrashed by neo-Nazis, as if anyone is responsible for those who gatecrash their event. This was yet another case of gutless Victorian Liberals unable to stand up to Andrews.

Is it any wonder the state is a basket case when there effectively has been no opposition to the worst government in its history? Whether it’s lockdowns, catastrophic debt, corruption, rampant union power, crime or culture wars, even a treaty with Indigenous Victorians, the Liberals have gone missing. It seems the only blow they can land is against one of their own, which a judge has now ruled fictitious and against the law.

In these circumstances, what decent leader wouldn’t apologise and move to repair the damage? Instead, in a delusional press conference, Pesutto insisted there was no need to apologise and Deeming should remain excluded from the partyroom. Worse still, he insisted the adverse judgment against him was in the past and that every Liberal supporter should rally around to make him premier.

Fat chance. Frontbencher Sam Groth has already resigned. Five of Pesutto’s colleagues, including another frontbencher, Richard Riordan, have petitioned Friday’s partyroom meeting to discuss the Deeming matter with a view to having her restored.

Then there’s the costs order that even Pesutto’s supporters think could run to $3m. Plus there has been a complaint to the Legal Services Commission about potentially unethical conduct in the earlier settlement of a defamation claim against Pesutto by Deeming’s two rally co-organisers.

Earlier this week, Victorian Liberal Party president Phil Davis emailed all 10,000 Victorian Liberal Party members advising that he’d cautioned Pesutto to settle the case before it went to court. I know he did this because I met with him personally, along with Deeming, to try to broker a deal that Pesutto then rejected. In his email, Davis reassured members that no Liberal Party funds had or would be used to pay for anything associated with this case.

If anything, Davis’s email has left the party rank and file even more exasperated that Pesutto’s stubbornness has ignited another round of infighting when Victorians desperately want a bad government held to account. Right now, the base knows any poll improvement is down to the manifest failures by Labor rather than a positive vote for the Liberals, who are still to release any major policies. They are applying pressure on Davis, as the party’s most senior official, to issue the apology to Deeming that Pesutto is not man enough to make.

The Deeming case has not only crystallised doubts about Pesutto’s trustworthiness and character, it has highlighted the ongoing polarisation of the party into antagonistic moderate and conservative camps. Pesutto, who – before his self-harm over Deeming – was arguably the person most capable of leading the party, is plainly in the former camp and tends to see all issues through the lens of his leafy, inner-urban Hawthorn seat, which he holds by only a handful of votes. Deeming, the former schoolteacher and western suburbs local government councillor, is firmly in the conservative camp.

Going into Friday’s meeting, should it come to a vote on Deeming’s re-admission or on Pesutto’s leadership, the numbers are thought to be locked at 14-all. But there are two conservatives whom Pesutto has promoted, upper house deputy Evan Mulholland and Treasury spokesman Brad Rowswell, who could shift given the likely scale of the costs order. We’ll see on Friday if being principled or craven will win out.

While the party’s electoral support is increasingly from outer-metropolitan voters, the party’s leadership is still concentrated in the established inner suburbs that can afford “luxury beliefs”.

This is a problem in every state and mirrors Labor’s difficulties reconciling its old working-class base with the green activists who dominate its branches. It doesn’t help that the Victorian Libs have been in opposition for more than 25 years, except for one term in power, and have lost the self-belief needed to win and the work ethic necessary to make it happen.

The way the Deeming judgment plays out matters because a state party campaigning against a government that lacks integrity must have integrity itself. It’s hard to hold against Labor the politicisation of the police and public service, the selective weaponisation of anti-corruption processes, the debasement of the judiciary, and Labor’s association with the corrupt and thuggish CFMEU, if the alternative government has flagrantly ignored a judge’s verdict about its leader’s conduct.

As well, ongoing internal uproar about the treatment of Deeming threatens to prejudice Peter Dutton’s chances of winning majority government in 2025. Given federal Labor’s woes, the seats of Aston, Dunkley, Chisholm, Corangamite and McEwen are well within reach if Dutton is to gain the 18 seats he needs – but not if booth workers and donors are on strike out of sympathy with Deeming. Plainly, Pesutto and his allies have decided that someone like Deeming is an embarrassment because she won’t give up her determination to preserve women’s safe spaces. Even though she continues to be a member of the wider party and has widespread support among the Liberal base. If the Victorian Liberal Party won’t stand up for women’s rights, then frankly it has no right to call itself Liberal.

Going on the principle that there are no stupid questions, only stupid people, I have a question:
FOMC indicates to people the idea that there will be less rate cuts next year.
Consequently:
Therefore the share market goes down- understandable.
Bond prices, TLT go down- understandable.
Bond yields therefore go up- understandable.
What I don’t get is why the US dollar goes up.
I can understand there is a relationship between the share market and the dollar, and that they might move opposite, a cheaper dollar makes US shares more attractive to foreign investors, maybe and vice versa.
But if both bond prices and the US market are moving down, where is the demand for the dollar coming from?

https://www.michaelsmithnews.com/2024/12/abc-diversity-celebrity-dan-bourchier-welcomes-his-new-boss-hugh-marks-to-country.html

We are supposed to take this malarkey seriously?

The “commander” of the kiwi ship that sunk is to face a military trial
Is this an attempt to whitewash the incident?

Incidentally, that’s a legitimate criticism of Mr. Dutton’s proposed nuclear plants.

They’ll be “off-budget” too, like that Ferrari.

“Earlier this year, the NBN had to write-off $30 billion as its expenses far exceed its revenue, despite its near monopoly status.”

Remember before NBN existed, and Telstra offered fibre to the node for $30 billion?
And they said “No – yesterdays tech”.
Then backed down and went with FTTN anyway when they realised FTTP was going to be 100 times more and they couldn’t afford it.

Yeah, that bad, right?

Even the alarmist APSI Institute is **slowly** getting it:

The energy transition that couldn’t | The Strategist

(Not entirely but good to see an author questioning the “energy transition”)

According to sources, Stephanopoulos was blindsided, unaware that Disney would back down in such a public manner until a few hours before the news broke. 

This is what is wrong with MSM “talent”.*
Stephanopoulos clearly defamed Trump by stating on air that Trump had “been found liable for rape” in the case brought by that swivel-eyed loon E. Jean Carroll.
No such finding was made.
Trump sued on the basis that this involved “actual malice” on the part of Stephanopoulos, which is a very high bar and the one public figures need to meet in the US to succeed in defamation claims.
ABC moved for dismissal but the JURDGE allowed it to proceed. This would have been the first red flag for ABC/Disney that they might be in trouble.
The next stage is discovery, and I have no doubt Trump’s lawyers uncovered some very juicy emails and texts which were going to show bias to the point of … ker-ching … “actual malice”.
The point is, Stephanopoulos has no say in this, and nor should he.
He isn’t cutting the cheques for damages or paying the lawyers, so ABC have correctly made a decision based on legal and commercial considerations.
If he is so pissed off he could always quit.
Or offer to indemnify ABC for any additional costs or damages and run the case himself.
Otherwise STFU.
…
* Exhibit A – Cane Toad.

Lysander

 December 19, 2024 2:38 pm

Are all you Cats at your Christmas functions or what?

Just back from lunch with a couple of Local Liberal Luminaries.
The consensus is that Prosciutto is dead man walking. If Moira Deeming isn’t accepted back into the party-room unconditionally, he will be asked to produce the legal advice which tells him the JURDGE got it wrong.
If he does not produce it, he is screwed.
If he does, he will be challenged to appeal the decision (which he won’t do).
Checkmate.
Apparently one of his faction (also a woman) likened Moira’s behaviour to a new employee in the office sticking it to the boss.
Err … wut?
Firstly, all MPs should be considered equals around the table when it comes to expressing views under the roof of the “broad church”.
And, secondly, Prosciutto is not “the boss”. He serves as leader at the pleasure of the Parliamentary party.
Something he is about to find out tomorrow I think.
If, as Peta Credlin suggests, the vote is tied 14-all, does Prosciutto cast his vote to tie and hang on?
Or does he do what he should have done as soon as the judgement came down?
That is … PISS OFF!

You must remember this, when David Suzuki was challenged on Q&A by a Tasmanian Professor who is a Climate Scientist.

He gets a schooling at:

9mins, 15 seconds:

The nature of David Suzuki

And 15mins, 25 secs.

Any Perth Cats heading south for Christmas might want to avoid this $1,040,000,000 new road:

Windscreens cracked on new Wilman Wadandi Highway in South West WA | PerthNow

New windscreens for Christmas is the cry of those who have travelled on the newly opened Wilman Wadandi Highway with reports loose rocks in the not-so-smooth road surface have smashed windscreens.

Social media lit up with complaints in the wake of the Bunbury Outer Ring Road officially opening to the public on Monday, with many saying they were shocked at the state of the new road as loose gravel flew at their cars.

US Omnibus funding Bill dead on arrival.

House conservatives revolt over GOP-backed spending bill to avoid shutdown – CBS News

Women trapped by sharia: ‘I must pay my husband ransom to divorce’About 100,000 marriages in the UK are believed to fall under the authority of sharia councils, also known as courts
Dominic Kennedy
, Investigations Editor
Wednesday December 18 2024, 7.10pm GMT, The Times

After suffering an onslaught of psychological abuse from her husband and increasingly unhappy in her marriage, Aisha finally decided she wanted a divorce.
There was one problem, however: her husband refused to allow it unless she paid him a five-figure sum covering all the money he spent on her during their marriage.
She offered instead to return her rings but he demanded the money they cost, a sum of thousands of pounds she could not afford.
“I feel like I have to pay ransom to get out of my marriage,” she told The Times.
Welcome to sharia, British style.

Because an Islamic marriage allows polygamy and permits only men to divorce at will, Aisha faces being trapped forever while her husband takes on new brides. The marriage was not officially registered so Aisha has no recourse to English law.
Aisha’s wedding was among 100,000 Islamic marriages estimated to have taken place in Britain and falling under the religious authority of sharia councils, also known as courts.
An investigation by The Times into the use of sharia in Britain has also found:
• A British sharia council states that husbands may dispose of their wives instantly by saying “divorce” three times, a practice banned in many countries in the Muslim world.
• Muslims are being encouraged by another sharia council to download a mobile phone app that creates sharia-compliant wills where daughters inherit half as much as sons.
• The app, aimed at users in England and Wales, has a drop-down menu for men to specify how many wives they have, up to four.
• Women are being asked to disclose when they had their last period in order to get a divorce.
• One of the country’s most prominent sharia councils was founded by a scholar who said men should not be questioned over why they hit their wives.
Britain is seen as the western capital for sharia councils, the informal guardians of religious law over the country’s fast-growing Muslim population.
Home to the first such institution in Europe in 1982, Britain is now expanding sharia services to Muslims overseas.
The Council of Europe, which protects human rights, has expressed concern about Britain’s sharia councils — estimated to number as many as 85 — discriminating against women, and the social pressure upon Muslims to use them.

The womenAisha (not her real name), who is in her twenties, was appalled when Dewsbury’s sharia council entertained her husband’s requests for compensation before setting her free.
Since she lacked the thousands of pounds requested, her husband offered to let her pay in instalments.
“Until I’m officially divorced Islamically, I still believe that I’m married to my husband. It’s hard to comprehend that I’m having to pay this amount just for something that’s spiritual.”

Another woman who struggled to divorce is Shakilla Malik, 45, from Manchester. She told the Karma Nirvana charity she suffered 13 years of domestic violence after being forced at 16 to marry a cousin in Pakistan.
She said the Dewsbury sharia council kept her waiting nearly three years for a divorce when her husband’s brother became involved.
“He wrote a letter to them saying that what a good dad his brother is, what a good husband he’s been, what a good person he was, [that] he prays five times a day,” she said. “This had nothing to do with my brother-in-law. They shouldn’t have given him the time of day.”
The Dewsbury sharia council said: “We understand that emotions can run high and that outcomes may not always meet everyone’s expectations, but our role is to guide couples towards constructive dialogue and decisions.”
A mother in the Midlands obtained a civil divorce after a decades-long arranged marriage to a cousin she wed as a teenager during a visit to Pakistan.
“In our culture and religion, if you don’t get divorced Islamically they say you’re still married. I wanted an Islamic divorce. I went to find somebody in the community … connected to the mosque,” she said.
The go-between made an indecent proposition that she should enter into a “mut’a”, a temporary religiously sanctioned union, sometimes branded a “pleasure marriage” because it enables couples to have sex and then part.
“Apart from my husband, no man has ever touched me. I sobbed my heart out when this guy proposed this to me,” she said.
The woman, in her forties, explained how some Muslim men such as her ex-husband use religiosity to exert patriarchal control over women.
He would demand sex, citing a hadith about Muhammad requiring wives to agree to intercourse even if on a camel’s back or saddle. The saying is used by some scholars to argue that there is no concept of marital rape in Islam.
Tanya Walker, a Tehran-born academic, explained in her book Sharia Councils and Muslim Women in Britain that some women used the councils due to community pressures. One woman said “religion is not important to me”. Another believed in God but not Islam and hated Islamic religious authorities.

‘Divorce, divorce, divorce’While Muslim women in Britain struggle to obtain divorces under sharia, the same is not true for men.
The Birmingham sharia council, part of the Birmingham Mosque Trust charity, explains on its website the concept of pronouncing talaq, the Arabic word for “divorce”. When declared by a husband, it effectively means “I divorce you”.
The council states online: “Men can divorce their wives unilaterally by pronouncing talaq three times either consecutively or on three separate occasions, depending on the Islamic school of thought by which the married couple abide.”
The Times asked Birmingham sharia council why it told couples that Muslim men may divorce in this way when the practice has been banned by 23 countries with large Muslim populations. They include Egypt, Pakistan, Bangladesh and India.

But – but – but, Islam is the most feminist of all religions…

Outright subversion and Mike Johnson was happy to go along with it. They are getting an earful from their constituents but it still might get through.

@sheislaurenlee

THE SPENDING BILL WOULD HAVE BLOCKED RFK JR. FROM UPDATING HHS PROTOCOL ON VACCINE INJURIES

On page 757, the bill amends the previously-passed “Prevent Pandemic Act” (42 USC 6627):

“The Secretary may not revise the Vaccine Injury Table to include a vaccine for which the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention has issued a recommendation for routine use in children or pregnant women until at least one application for such vaccine has been approved.

Upon such revision of the Vaccine Injury Table, all vaccines in a vaccine category on the Vaccine Injury Table, including vaccines authorized under emergency use… shall be considered included in the Vaccine Injury Table.”

They also added: “An injury or death related to a administered at a time when the vaccine was a covered countermeasure subiect to a declaration under section 319F-3 (b) SHALL NOT BE ELIGIBLE FOR COMPENSATION under the Program.”

Sneaky.